Mtume Muhammad: Jamii isipotoshwe; Jua huzama katika Chemchemu ya matope Meusi na Mazito

Mtume Muhammad: Jamii isipotoshwe; Jua huzama katika Chemchemu ya matope Meusi na Mazito

Status
Not open for further replies.
Kuna Mungu Baba, Mungu Mwana na Mungu Roho Mtakatifu. Na watatu hawa Ni UMOJA.

1×1×1=1

SASA YESU HAPA ANAANGUKIA KATIKA KATEGORI YA MUNGU MWANA.

LAKINI YEYE(Yesu) NA MUNGU BABA NI UMOJA.
One God in Three Persons.

SIMPLE AS THAT...

Utatu huu umedhihirika
wakati Yesu anabatizwa pale Yordan,
Wakati amepanda mlimani
Wakati anawaagiza wakabatize na kuhubiri Injili.

Na sehemu zingine..

Hii ni Kinyume na Qur'an inayodai kuna separate Gods. Yaani Mungu Baba, Mungu Mwana na Mungu Bikira Maria.
1+1+1=3
Kisha inasema 3 Gods.

Kisha inawalaumu na wayahudi kusema Uzair ni mwana wa Mungu.
Ambapo ukifuatilia tangu zama za Yesu Kristo. WAYAHUDI hawajawahi kua na IMANI hiyo KAMA HIYO ASILANI.
Maana kama ingekuwepo Basi Yesu angeielezea.

Truth matters.

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app


John 14:8-9 (hath seen the father):

Well, what about the verse

"He that hath seen me hath seen the father."

Let us look at the context:

"Philip saith unto him, Lord, shew us the Father, and it sufficeth us. Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Shew us the Father?"

John 14:8-9

Philip wanted to see God with his own eyes, but this is impossible since no one can ever do ever do that. The Bible says:

"No man hath seen God at any time,"

John 1:18

"No man hath seen God at any time,"

1 John 4:12

"And the Father himself, which hath sent me, hath borne witness of me. Ye have neither heard his voice at any time, nor seen his shape."

John 5:37

But they were listening to Jesus' voice and looking at him standing before them! Jesus was simply simply telling us that his own actions and miracles should be a sufficient proof of the existence of God without God having to physically come down and let himself be seen every time someone is doubtful. This is equivalent to for example:

1)John 8:19: "Then said they unto him, Where is thy Father? Jesus answered, Ye neither know me, nor my Father: if ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also."

2)John 12:44 "Jesus cried and said, He that believeth on me, believeth not on me, but on him that sent me."

3)John 15:23 "He that hateth me hateth my Father also."

4)Matthew 10:40-41 "He that receiveth you receiveth me (Jesus), and he that receiveth me receiveth him that sent me. He that receiveth a prophet in the name of a prophet shall receive a prophet's reward; and he that receiveth a righteous man in the name of a righteous man shall receive a righteous man's reward."

5)Judges 13:20-22: "For it came to pass, when the flame went up toward heaven from off the altar, that the angel of the LORD ascended in the flame of the altar. And Manoah and his wife looked on [it], and fell on their faces to the ground. But the angel of the LORD did no more appear to Manoah and to his wife. Then Manoah knew that he [was] an angel of the LORD. And Manoah said unto his wife, We shall surely die, because we have seen God."

If we want to insist that when Philip saw Jesus (pbuh), he had actually physically seen God "the Father" because Jesus "is" the father and both are one "Trinity," and Jesus is the "incarnation" of God, then this will force us to conclude that John 1:18, 1 John 4:12, John 5:37..etc. are all lies.

Well, is Philip the only one who ever "saw the father"? Let us read:

"Not that any man hath seen the Father, save he which is of God, he hath seen the Father."

John 6:46

Who is this who "is of God" and had seen the Father you ask? Let us once again ask the Bible:

"He that is of God heareth God's words: ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God."

John 8:47.

And

"Beloved, follow not that which is evil, but that which is good. He that doeth good is of God: but he that doeth evil hath not seen God"

3 John 1:11.

Have all people who have done good also physically seen God?

"No vision can grasp Him, but His grasp is over all vision. He is the Subtle, the Well-Acquainted [with all things]"

The noble Qur'an, Al-Anaam(6):103

"And when Moses came to the time and place appointed by Us, and His Lord spoke to him he said: 'O my Lord! Show me [Yourself], that I may look upon you.' [Allah] said: You cannot see Me, but look at the mountain. If it stands in its place then you shall see me.' So when his Lord appeared to the mountain He made it disintegrate and Moses fell down unconscious. Then when he awoke he said: 'Glory be to You! I turn to you in repentance and I am the first of the believers'"

The noble Qur'an, Al-Aaraf(7):143

Once again, let us have a look at our table:

Explicit Statement Implicit Statement

God is ONE Isaiah 43:10-11, Deuteronomy 4:39, Isaiah 45:18, Isaiah 44:6, Isaiah 45:6, Isaiah 45:22, Exodus 20:3, Exodus 34:14

God is TWO John 1:1, John 10:30John.10:33, John 5:18 John 20:28, John.14:6, John 14:8-9

God is THREE 1 John 5:7 Matthew 28:19, I Corinthians 12:4-6, II Corinthians 13:14,Jude 1:20-21

God is MANY Genesis 1:26
 
wee baba fatuma aka allah anaswali kala sigda makalio juu kanzu imenasa deki [emoji53] kaja mbwa kakumbuka mchezo wao wa kuingiliana kifisifisi ameanza kumshughulikia [emoji15] wee unaita kwa wanyama [emoji15] sawa umepatia [emoji122] [emoji122] [emoji122] [emoji106] hapo imepenya gharama yake kata.3 [emoji117] View attachment 981919

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
Kwishnei , tangazia Tu kama Mapadri wenzako kuwa ni kifaa cha watu
 

Huyu [emoji117]
IMG_20181231_100303_642.jpg
ukiona navunja kijiti ujue nimekubali [emoji38]

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
John 14:8-9 (hath seen the father):

Well, what about the verse

"He that hath seen me hath seen the father."

Let us look at the context:

"Philip saith unto him, Lord, shew us the Father, and it sufficeth us. Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Shew us the Father?"

John 14:8-9

Philip wanted to see God with his own eyes, but this is impossible since no one can ever do ever do that. The Bible says:

"No man hath seen God at any time,"

John 1:18

"No man hath seen God at any time,"

1 John 4:12

"And the Father himself, which hath sent me, hath borne witness of me. Ye have neither heard his voice at any time, nor seen his shape."

John 5:37

But they were listening to Jesus' voice and looking at him standing before them! Jesus was simply simply telling us that his own actions and miracles should be a sufficient proof of the existence of God without God having to physically come down and let himself be seen every time someone is doubtful. This is equivalent to for example:

1)John 8:19: "Then said they unto him, Where is thy Father? Jesus answered, Ye neither know me, nor my Father: if ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also."

2)John 12:44 "Jesus cried and said, He that believeth on me, believeth not on me, but on him that sent me."

3)John 15:23 "He that hateth me hateth my Father also."

4)Matthew 10:40-41 "He that receiveth you receiveth me (Jesus), and he that receiveth me receiveth him that sent me. He that receiveth a prophet in the name of a prophet shall receive a prophet's reward; and he that receiveth a righteous man in the name of a righteous man shall receive a righteous man's reward."

5)Judges 13:20-22: "For it came to pass, when the flame went up toward heaven from off the altar, that the angel of the LORD ascended in the flame of the altar. And Manoah and his wife looked on [it], and fell on their faces to the ground. But the angel of the LORD did no more appear to Manoah and to his wife. Then Manoah knew that he [was] an angel of the LORD. And Manoah said unto his wife, We shall surely die, because we have seen God."

If we want to insist that when Philip saw Jesus (pbuh), he had actually physically seen God "the Father" because Jesus "is" the father and both are one "Trinity," and Jesus is the "incarnation" of God, then this will force us to conclude that John 1:18, 1 John 4:12, John 5:37..etc. are all lies.

Well, is Philip the only one who ever "saw the father"? Let us read:

"Not that any man hath seen the Father, save he which is of God, he hath seen the Father."

John 6:46

Who is this who "is of God" and had seen the Father you ask? Let us once again ask the Bible:

"He that is of God heareth God's words: ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God."

John 8:47.

And

"Beloved, follow not that which is evil, but that which is good. He that doeth good is of God: but he that doeth evil hath not seen God"

3 John 1:11.

Have all people who have done good also physically seen God?

"No vision can grasp Him, but His grasp is over all vision. He is the Subtle, the Well-Acquainted [with all things]"

The noble Qur'an, Al-Anaam(6):103

"And when Moses came to the time and place appointed by Us, and His Lord spoke to him he said: 'O my Lord! Show me [Yourself], that I may look upon you.' [Allah] said: You cannot see Me, but look at the mountain. If it stands in its place then you shall see me.' So when his Lord appeared to the mountain He made it disintegrate and Moses fell down unconscious. Then when he awoke he said: 'Glory be to You! I turn to you in repentance and I am the first of the believers'"

The noble Qur'an, Al-Aaraf(7):143

Once again, let us have a look at our table:

Explicit Statement Implicit Statement

God is ONE Isaiah 43:10-11, Deuteronomy 4:39, Isaiah 45:18, Isaiah 44:6, Isaiah 45:6, Isaiah 45:22, Exodus 20:3, Exodus 34:14

God is TWO John 1:1, John 10:30John.10:33, John 5:18 John 20:28, John.14:6, John 14:8-9

God is THREE 1 John 5:7 Matthew 28:19, I Corinthians 12:4-6, II Corinthians 13:14,Jude 1:20-21

God is MANY Genesis 1:26
Qur'an 4:171

O People of the Book! Commit no excesses in your religion: Nor say of Allah aught but the truth. Christ Jesus the son of Mary was 1.A MESSENGER OF ALLAH , and 2. HIS WORD, which He bestowed on Mary, and 3.A SPIRIT PRECEEDING FROM HIM: so believe in Allah and His messengers. Say not "Trinity": desist: it will be better for you: for Allah is one Allah: Glory be to Him: (far exalted is He) above having a son. To Him belong all things in the heavens and on earth. And enough is Allah as a Disposer of affairs.


Lets analyse this ayat.

CHRIST IS..

1. A MESSENGER

2. The WORD

3. A SPIRIT preceeding from God.


Trinity...

So Jesus The Christ has Three forms, A Messenger which is Human Being, A Word which makes him God and A Spirit that proceeding from Allah everyday


Filipo akamwambia, Bwana, utuonyeshe Baba, YATUTOSHA.
Yesu akamwambia, MIMI NIMEKUWAPO PAMOJA NANYI SIKU HIZI ZOTE, WEWE USINIJUE FILIPO?





Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
Qur'an 4:171

O People of the Book! Commit no excesses in your religion: Nor say of Allah aught but the truth. Christ Jesus the son of Mary was 1.A MESSENGER OF ALLAH , and 2. HIS WORD, which He bestowed on Mary, and 3.A SPIRIT PRECEEDING FROM HIM: so believe in Allah and His messengers. Say not "Trinity": desist: it will be better for you: for Allah is one Allah: Glory be to Him: (far exalted is He) above having a son. To Him belong all things in the heavens and on earth. And enough is Allah as a Disposer of affairs.


Lets analyse this ayat.

CHRIST IS..

1. A MESSENGER

2. The WORD

3. A SPIRIT preceeding from God.


Trinity...

So Jesus The Christ has Three forms, A Messenger which is Human Being, A Word which makes him God and A Spirit that proceeding from Allah everyday


Filipo akamwambia, Bwana, utuonyeshe Baba, YATUTOSHA.
Yesu akamwambia, MIMI NIMEKUWAPO PAMOJA NANYI SIKU HIZI ZOTE, WEWE USINIJUE FILIPO?





Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app

WACHA KUPOTOSHA SHIRIKINA , KAFIRI WAHED WEWE,

Praise be to Allah

Firstly:

Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning):

“Surely, disbelievers are those who said: ‘Allah is the third of the three (in a Trinity).’ But there is no llaah (god) (none who has the right to be worshipped) but One Ilaah (God -Allah). And if they cease not from what they say, verily, a painful torment will befall on the disbelievers among them”

[al-Maa’idah 5:73].


Pickthall

O People of the Scripture! Do not exaggerate in your religion nor utter aught concerning Allah save the truth. The Messiah, Jesus son of Mary, was only a messenger of Allah, and His word which He conveyed unto Mary, and a spirit from Him. So believe in Allah and His messengers, and say not "Three" - Cease! (it is) better for you! - Allah is only One Allah. Far is it removed from His Transcendent Majesty that He should have a son. His is all that is in the heavens and all that is in the earth. And Allah is sufficient as Defender.
 
Umeuliza maswali ya msingi sana. Nilikua nimuulize. Nikaona acha nipuuzie tu.
Maana...
...

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
Nenda nao hivyohivyo kidogokidogo hadi wataaelewa na kuamua Kubatizwa kwa Jina la
(Baba na la Mwana na la Roho Mtakatifu)
Waambia hayo majina matatu yaliyo kwenye Parandesi ni ya Mungu mmoja.
Ni kama mtu mmoja anavyoitwa
( Chacha Mwita Marwa )
Kumbuka hao ni Kondoo wa Kristo hivyo usiwadhihaki bali waelimishe kwa hekima na upole kama unavyofanya.
Na wataelewa tu.
Jesus is God.




Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
Qur'an 4:171

O People of the Book! Commit no excesses in your religion: Nor say of Allah aught but the truth. Christ Jesus the son of Mary was 1.A MESSENGER OF ALLAH , and 2. HIS WORD, which He bestowed on Mary, and 3.A SPIRIT PRECEEDING FROM HIM: so believe in Allah and His messengers. Say not "Trinity": desist: it will be better for you: for Allah is one Allah: Glory be to Him: (far exalted is He) above having a son. To Him belong all things in the heavens and on earth. And enough is Allah as a Disposer of affairs.


Lets analyse this ayat.

CHRIST IS..

1. A MESSENGER

2. The WORD

3. A SPIRIT preceeding from God.


Trinity...

So Jesus The Christ has Three forms, A Messenger which is Human Being, A Word which makes him God and A Spirit that proceeding from Allah everyday


Filipo akamwambia, Bwana, utuonyeshe Baba, YATUTOSHA.
Yesu akamwambia, MIMI NIMEKUWAPO PAMOJA NANYI SIKU HIZI ZOTE, WEWE USINIJUE FILIPO?





Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app


Tazama kile kilichokuwepo kabla na baada ya Yohana 14:8

"Filipo akamwambia, Bwana utuonyesha Baba, yatutosha. Yesu akamwambia, Mimi nimekuwepo pamoja nanyi siku hizi zote, wewe usinijue, Filipo? Aliyeniona mimi amemwona Baba; Basi wewe wasemaje, Utuonyeshe Baba?"

Yesu alimuuliza Filipo vipi nimwonyeshe Mungu kwa wanafunzi, kitu ambacho hakiwezekani. Unatakiwa umwamini Mungu kwa kuheshimu Viumbe vyake: jua, mwezi, viumbe vyote, na Yesu, aliyeumbwa na Mungu.

Yeye amesema katika Yohana 4:24 "Mungu ni Roho....

." na Yohana 5:37 "... Sauti yake hamkuisikia wakati wowote, wala Sura yake hamkuiona."

Vipi utaweza kuona roho?

Kile walichokiona kilikuwa ni Yesu, sio Mungu. Paulo amesema katika 1 Timotheo 6:16

"Ambaye yeye peke yake hapatikani na mauti, amekaa katika nuru isiyoweza kukaribiwa; wala hakuna mwanadamu aliyemwona, wala awezaye kumwona. Heshima na uwezo una yeye hata milele. Amina."

Kwa hiyo kile ukionacho si Mungu.

Qurani inasema katika Sura 6:103 "Macho hayamfikii (kumwona), bali yeye anayafikia macho (kuyaona na kuwaona hao wenye macho). Naye ni Mwenye kujua yaliyofichikana na yaliyo dhahiri."
 
Nenda nao hivyohivyo kidogokidogo hadi wataaelewa na kuamua Kubatizwa kwa Jina la
(Baba na la Mwana na la Roho Mtakatifu)
Waambia hayo majina matatu yaliyo kwenye Parandesi ni ya Mungu mmoja.
Ni kama mtu mmoja anavyoitwa
( Chacha Mwita Marwa )
Kumbuka hao ni Kondoo wa Kristo hivyo usiwadhihaki bali waelimishe kwa hekima na upole kama unavyofanya.
Na wataelewa tu.
Jesus is God.




Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app

KWA KUTUMIA ID NYENGINE 😛😛😛😛
 
View attachment 981960 mbwa kanogewa hadi udenda unamtoka [emoji15] [emoji38] kwa Mara ya mwisho umemgeza lini baba fatuuû kuliwa mvutu na kelb [emoji15] [emoji4]

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app



Uungu wa Yesu ulianza vipi?


Tangu mwishoni mwa Karne ya tatu ulitokea mvutano mkubwa sana katika Kanisa kuhusu mafundisho ya Maaskofu kuhusu Cheo cha Yesu na Mariamu. Mabishano hayo yaliendelea kwa kasi kila mtu alimtafsiri Yesu kivyake.

Hali ilizidi kuwa mbaya sana mpaka mnamo mwaka 325 AD ilimlazimu Mfalme wa wakati huo Konstantine awaite Maaskofu wote wa wakati huo, inasemekana Maaskofu walio udhuria ni kati ya 250-318 ili waje waelewane na kuwa na msimamo mmoja lakini ni sehemu tu ya Maaskofu walio hudhuria. Wakati huo Konstantine alikuwa Mpagani mwabudu jua kwa wazazi wake, (soma kitabu kinachoitwa The Early Church).

Aliwakusanya Maaskofu ili kuleta utulivu katika utawala wake. Mfalme huyu ndiye aliyekuwa Mwenyekiti na mtendaji muhimu katika mkutano huo.

Majadiliano yalikuwa makali sana iliwachukua miezi miwili bila mwafaka wowote ndipo Mfalme aliingilia kati na kutoa uamuzi wake na ndiyo uliofuatwa. Yeye aliwaunga mkono wale waliosema Yesu ni Mungu kweli na ni mtu kweli pia ni mwana wa Mungu aliye sawa na Baba yake Mungu, pia Mariamu ni mama wa Mungu pia ni Malkia wa Mbinguni. Kwa hiyo Mfalme Mpagani aliyekuwa bado mwenye imani za kipagani akawa ameshiriki sehemu ya maana sana katika kumpandisha cheo Bwana Yesu toka kuwa mtume hadi kuwa Mungu kamili na Mariamu akawa mama wa Mungu.

Kama nilivyosema Kostantini alikuwa Mpagani hivyo, hakuwa na ujuzi kamili juu ya maswali yaliyokuwa yakiulizwa katika Thiolojia ya Kigiriki alilojua ni kuleta amani katika utawala wake tu. (Soma A Short History of Christian Doctrine).

Uamuzi huo ulikuwa ni wa kijeshi na si hiyari, na Maaskofu waliomhofu Mfalme, baadhi walitia sahihi zao lakini wengine walikataa, (baadhi ya kikundi kilicho kataa ni kile kilicho julikana kama Arian) waliokataa waliteswa sana na kunyanyaswa, kuna waliuwawa kikatili kwa kuchomwa moto wakiwa hai na mateso mengine kadhaa wa kadha yasiyo semekana. (Theologian Arius 250-336 AD, who lived and taught in Alexandria, Egypt, in the early 4th century).

Mkutano huo ulikuwa katika mji wa NICEA na uliitwa Baraza la NICEA mwaka 325 AD. The First Council of Nicaea 325 C uwamuzi wa NICEA haukuleta utulivu kama ulivyotegemewa, bali ulisababisha vurugu za hali ya juu, mateso na mauaji yalikuwa makubwa sana hasa kwa wale waliokataa fundisho hilo la Yesu kuwa Mungu na Mariamu kuwa mama wa Mungu, Malkia na Mbinguni. (Sophia) Mateso na mabishano yalienea zaidi huko Ufaransa ya Kusini, Hispania na Ujerumani miaka mingi iliyopita hasa baada ya Patano la Milano ambapo Kostantini na Kanisa walishirikiana vizuri.

Makanisa yakajengwa kwa gharama za serikali na hapo mateso yalizidi, watu wengi waliuwawa vibaya na hovyohovyo tu bila kuangalia haki za binadam. Ilifikia kipindi hata baadhi ya watu kuokwa kwenye matanuri ya moto. (Soma kitabu kinachoitwa Jesus and the Goddess by Timothy Freke & Peter gandy)Ilipofika mwaka 381 A.D. mambo yalizidi kuwa mabaya sana, hapo Mfalme aliyekuwa anatawala wakati huo Theodosius aliitisha tena mkutano wa Maaskofu wote.

Katika mkutano huo Mfalme alitangaza rasmi kuunga mkono uamuzi wa Baraza la NICEA.

Pia walikubaliana Roho Mtakatifu aunganishwe katika utatu Mtakatifu hapo ndipo imani ya utatu wa Mungu Mmoja ilianza ili kuwathibiti wale waliokuwa wanapinga ilitolewa amri kwamba hakuna ruksa kwa mtu yeyote kupinga au kutafsiri neno linalohusu Biblia au mapokeo soma Hati ya Ufunuo ya Vaticani 10:4 imeandikwa: -

Lakini haki ya kutoa tafsiri thabiti ya neno la Mungu au mapokeo imekabidhiwa mamlaka ya kifundishi ya Kanisa Katoliki peke yake tu. Mkutano huo unaitwa Baraza la Kostantinopol. Mwaka 381 A.D. Historia inaendelea kutueleza kwamba Kanisa liliendelea kuwatesa na kuwauwa wote waliojaribu kupinga au kufafanua vingine, mamlaka ya Kanisa ikishirikiana na serikali, watu waliteswa kwa njia nyingi, mfano: -

wapo waliofungwa na kunyimwa chakula hadi kufa, wengine walitupwa kwenye zizi lililokuwa na wanyama wakali na kuliwa na wengine walilazimishwa kukalia vyuma vyenye moto, wengine walivalishwa shingoni mikufu yenye misumari yenye ncha kali baadaye misumari ilipigiliwa na kuingia shingoni hadi kufa. Wengine walibanwa na Koleo maalum Magotini na kuvunja miguu na kuwalazimisha wakubali mafundisho ya Kanisa la Roma. Wapo waliochunwa ngozi ya mwili wakiwa hai mfano wa mbuzi na walikufa kwa mateso makali.

Uamuzi huu wakutisha ulikuwa unatimiza maneno ya Yesu Mathayo 12:36. Nawaambia hakika, siku ya hukumu watu watatakiwa kujieleza kuhusu kila neno lisilo la maana walilolisema. Vile vile Yesu anasema… Mathayo 13:36-43 ...Akasema azipandaye mbegu njema ni mwana wa Adamu lile Konde ni ulimwengu zile mbegu njema ni wana wa Mfalme, yale magugu ni wana wa yule mwovu aliyepanda ni Ibilisi mavuno ni mwisho wa dunia wavunao ni malaika kama vile magugu yanavyokusanywa na kuchomwa motoni ndivyo itakavyokuwa katika mwisho wa Dunia… mwenye masikio na asikie.

Uamuzi huo ulitimiza kweli magugu yalikuwa yamepandwa Ulimwenguni, imani ya uongo iliingia kwa nguvu kama vile magugu yanavyoingia shambani na kuharibu ngano. Ndivyo ilivyo hadi leo hii fundisho hilo la uongo limekuwa ndiyo msingi mkubwa wa imani ya Kanisa Duniani pote.

Ipo njia inayoonekana kuwa sawa machoni mwa mtu lakini mwisho wake ni mauti mithili 14:12 Viongozi wa Kanisa waliona kwamba njia nzuri ya kumuheshimu Yesu ni kumpandisha Cheo toka Mtume wa Mungu hadi kuwa Mungu sawa Mungu Muumba vyote kabisa.

Mariamu akapandishwa kutoka mama wa Mtume Mtakatifu.

Viongozi wakampandisha cheo cha mama wa Mungu na ni Malkia wa Mbinguni

Viongozi hao inafaa wafungwe jiwe la kusagia shingoni sababu wamewakosesha watu hadi leo hii wanaendelea kuwakosesha kwa mafundisho ya uongo Marko 9:42.

Ndugu Msomaji ninakushauri uende Maktaba utaona vitabu na kurasa maelfu ambavyo wanathiolojia wamejitahidi sana kutoa fafanuzi mbalimbali na mitajo ya kila aina ili kupata ukweli wa mambo kuhusu utatu lakini huishia kuchanganyikiwa, na kuacha bila kuelewa na hawapati ushahidi ulio yakinifu. Baadhi ya Wanatheolojia wanasemaje?

Kitabu cha A Short History of Christian Doctrine. Mwanathiolojia Bernhard Lohse anaeleza kwamba …ingawa Agano Jipya linahusika sana hata hivyo hatupati fundisho la utatu katika Agano Jipya.

Kitabu cha New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology, kinasema
…hakuna kabisa ushahidi katika Agano Jipya unaothibitisha utatu.

Profesa wa Chuo Kikuu cha Yale bwana E. Washburn Hopkins anasema katika kitabu cha Origin and Evolution of Religion kwamba …hata Yesu mwenyewe halijui kabisa fundisho hilo la utatu sababu hakuna mtajo popote unaotuambia kwamba yeye ni Mungu. Dhana hii ya utatu ilikuja miaka mia tatu baada ya kuondoka bwana Yesu.

Mwana Historia Weigall, Arthur anasema katika kitabu cha The Paganism in our Christianity …kwamba wazo la utatu liliingizwa na viongozi wa kanisa mnamo karne ya tatu baada ya kuondoka bwana wetu…Vitabu vyote vya Agano la kale na Injili zote nne hakuna fundisho hilo kabisa kama linavyofundishwa makanisani duniani pote siku hizi.

Kitabu cha New Catholic Encyclopaedia tunapata maelezo kwamba mamlaka ya Kanisa husema wazi kwamba ...utatu siyo fundisho la moja kwa moja…ila ni fumbo la imani tu.

Kitabu cha Kikatoliki Trinitas A. Thiolojicar Encyclopandia of the Holy Trinity Tertuliano. Baadhi ya mafundisho yake yalitumiwa na watu wengine…na hutahadharisha kutokua na haraka kuhusu utatu.

Katika vitabu vya New Catholic Encyclopadia na The Encyclopadia of Religion wanathiolojia hukubaliana kwamba katika Biblia hakuna fundisho la utatu… kabisa.

Mwanathiolojia Myeswiti Edmund Fortiman anatueleza katika kitabu cha The Triune God kwamba …katika Agano la Kale hatuoni ushahidi wa mwandishi mtakatifu yeyote anayetuambia lolote kuhusu utatu… uchunguzi wa maandiko Matakatifu ya kiebrania umeonyesha kwamba hakuna fundisho la ajabu jinsi hiyo katika Biblia.

Kitabu cha Encyclopadia Americana kinasema kwamba imani ya utatu lilikuwa fundisho la upotevu tangu Karne ya nne na ni upagani.
 
Uungu wa Yesu ulianza vipi?


Tangu mwishoni mwa Karne ya tatu ulitokea mvutano mkubwa sana katika Kanisa kuhusu mafundisho ya Maaskofu kuhusu Cheo cha Yesu na Mariamu. Mabishano hayo yaliendelea kwa kasi kila mtu alimtafsiri Yesu kivyake.

Hali ilizidi kuwa mbaya sana mpaka mnamo mwaka 325 AD ilimlazimu Mfalme wa wakati huo Konstantine awaite Maaskofu wote wa wakati huo, inasemekana Maaskofu walio udhuria ni kati ya 250-318 ili waje waelewane na kuwa na msimamo mmoja lakini ni sehemu tu ya Maaskofu walio hudhuria. Wakati huo Konstantine alikuwa Mpagani mwabudu jua kwa wazazi wake, (soma kitabu kinachoitwa The Early Church).

Aliwakusanya Maaskofu ili kuleta utulivu katika utawala wake. Mfalme huyu ndiye aliyekuwa Mwenyekiti na mtendaji muhimu katika mkutano huo.

Majadiliano yalikuwa makali sana iliwachukua miezi miwili bila mwafaka wowote ndipo Mfalme aliingilia kati na kutoa uamuzi wake na ndiyo uliofuatwa. Yeye aliwaunga mkono wale waliosema Yesu ni Mungu kweli na ni mtu kweli pia ni mwana wa Mungu aliye sawa na Baba yake Mungu, pia Mariamu ni mama wa Mungu pia ni Malkia wa Mbinguni. Kwa hiyo Mfalme Mpagani aliyekuwa bado mwenye imani za kipagani akawa ameshiriki sehemu ya maana sana katika kumpandisha cheo Bwana Yesu toka kuwa mtume hadi kuwa Mungu kamili na Mariamu akawa mama wa Mungu.

Kama nilivyosema Kostantini alikuwa Mpagani hivyo, hakuwa na ujuzi kamili juu ya maswali yaliyokuwa yakiulizwa katika Thiolojia ya Kigiriki alilojua ni kuleta amani katika utawala wake tu. (Soma A Short History of Christian Doctrine).

Uamuzi huo ulikuwa ni wa kijeshi na si hiyari, na Maaskofu waliomhofu Mfalme, baadhi walitia sahihi zao lakini wengine walikataa, (baadhi ya kikundi kilicho kataa ni kile kilicho julikana kama Arian) waliokataa waliteswa sana na kunyanyaswa, kuna waliuwawa kikatili kwa kuchomwa moto wakiwa hai na mateso mengine kadhaa wa kadha yasiyo semekana. (Theologian Arius 250-336 AD, who lived and taught in Alexandria, Egypt, in the early 4th century).

Mkutano huo ulikuwa katika mji wa NICEA na uliitwa Baraza la NICEA mwaka 325 AD. The First Council of Nicaea 325 C uwamuzi wa NICEA haukuleta utulivu kama ulivyotegemewa, bali ulisababisha vurugu za hali ya juu, mateso na mauaji yalikuwa makubwa sana hasa kwa wale waliokataa fundisho hilo la Yesu kuwa Mungu na Mariamu kuwa mama wa Mungu, Malkia na Mbinguni. (Sophia) Mateso na mabishano yalienea zaidi huko Ufaransa ya Kusini, Hispania na Ujerumani miaka mingi iliyopita hasa baada ya Patano la Milano ambapo Kostantini na Kanisa walishirikiana vizuri.

Makanisa yakajengwa kwa gharama za serikali na hapo mateso yalizidi, watu wengi waliuwawa vibaya na hovyohovyo tu bila kuangalia haki za binadam. Ilifikia kipindi hata baadhi ya watu kuokwa kwenye matanuri ya moto. (Soma kitabu kinachoitwa Jesus and the Goddess by Timothy Freke & Peter gandy)Ilipofika mwaka 381 A.D. mambo yalizidi kuwa mabaya sana, hapo Mfalme aliyekuwa anatawala wakati huo Theodosius aliitisha tena mkutano wa Maaskofu wote.

Katika mkutano huo Mfalme alitangaza rasmi kuunga mkono uamuzi wa Baraza la NICEA.

Pia walikubaliana Roho Mtakatifu aunganishwe katika utatu Mtakatifu hapo ndipo imani ya utatu wa Mungu Mmoja ilianza ili kuwathibiti wale waliokuwa wanapinga ilitolewa amri kwamba hakuna ruksa kwa mtu yeyote kupinga au kutafsiri neno linalohusu Biblia au mapokeo soma Hati ya Ufunuo ya Vaticani 10:4 imeandikwa: -

Lakini haki ya kutoa tafsiri thabiti ya neno la Mungu au mapokeo imekabidhiwa mamlaka ya kifundishi ya Kanisa Katoliki peke yake tu. Mkutano huo unaitwa Baraza la Kostantinopol. Mwaka 381 A.D. Historia inaendelea kutueleza kwamba Kanisa liliendelea kuwatesa na kuwauwa wote waliojaribu kupinga au kufafanua vingine, mamlaka ya Kanisa ikishirikiana na serikali, watu waliteswa kwa njia nyingi, mfano: -

wapo waliofungwa na kunyimwa chakula hadi kufa, wengine walitupwa kwenye zizi lililokuwa na wanyama wakali na kuliwa na wengine walilazimishwa kukalia vyuma vyenye moto, wengine walivalishwa shingoni mikufu yenye misumari yenye ncha kali baadaye misumari ilipigiliwa na kuingia shingoni hadi kufa. Wengine walibanwa na Koleo maalum Magotini na kuvunja miguu na kuwalazimisha wakubali mafundisho ya Kanisa la Roma. Wapo waliochunwa ngozi ya mwili wakiwa hai mfano wa mbuzi na walikufa kwa mateso makali.

Uamuzi huu wakutisha ulikuwa unatimiza maneno ya Yesu Mathayo 12:36. Nawaambia hakika, siku ya hukumu watu watatakiwa kujieleza kuhusu kila neno lisilo la maana walilolisema. Vile vile Yesu anasema… Mathayo 13:36-43 ...Akasema azipandaye mbegu njema ni mwana wa Adamu lile Konde ni ulimwengu zile mbegu njema ni wana wa Mfalme, yale magugu ni wana wa yule mwovu aliyepanda ni Ibilisi mavuno ni mwisho wa dunia wavunao ni malaika kama vile magugu yanavyokusanywa na kuchomwa motoni ndivyo itakavyokuwa katika mwisho wa Dunia… mwenye masikio na asikie.

Uamuzi huo ulitimiza kweli magugu yalikuwa yamepandwa Ulimwenguni, imani ya uongo iliingia kwa nguvu kama vile magugu yanavyoingia shambani na kuharibu ngano. Ndivyo ilivyo hadi leo hii fundisho hilo la uongo limekuwa ndiyo msingi mkubwa wa imani ya Kanisa Duniani pote.

Ipo njia inayoonekana kuwa sawa machoni mwa mtu lakini mwisho wake ni mauti mithili 14:12 Viongozi wa Kanisa waliona kwamba njia nzuri ya kumuheshimu Yesu ni kumpandisha Cheo toka Mtume wa Mungu hadi kuwa Mungu sawa Mungu Muumba vyote kabisa.

Mariamu akapandishwa kutoka mama wa Mtume Mtakatifu.

Viongozi wakampandisha cheo cha mama wa Mungu na ni Malkia wa Mbinguni

Viongozi hao inafaa wafungwe jiwe la kusagia shingoni sababu wamewakosesha watu hadi leo hii wanaendelea kuwakosesha kwa mafundisho ya uongo Marko 9:42.

Ndugu Msomaji ninakushauri uende Maktaba utaona vitabu na kurasa maelfu ambavyo wanathiolojia wamejitahidi sana kutoa fafanuzi mbalimbali na mitajo ya kila aina ili kupata ukweli wa mambo kuhusu utatu lakini huishia kuchanganyikiwa, na kuacha bila kuelewa na hawapati ushahidi ulio yakinifu. Baadhi ya Wanatheolojia wanasemaje?

Kitabu cha A Short History of Christian Doctrine. Mwanathiolojia Bernhard Lohse anaeleza kwamba …ingawa Agano Jipya linahusika sana hata hivyo hatupati fundisho la utatu katika Agano Jipya.

Kitabu cha New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology, kinasema
…hakuna kabisa ushahidi katika Agano Jipya unaothibitisha utatu.

Profesa wa Chuo Kikuu cha Yale bwana E. Washburn Hopkins anasema katika kitabu cha Origin and Evolution of Religion kwamba …hata Yesu mwenyewe halijui kabisa fundisho hilo la utatu sababu hakuna mtajo popote unaotuambia kwamba yeye ni Mungu. Dhana hii ya utatu ilikuja miaka mia tatu baada ya kuondoka bwana Yesu.

Mwana Historia Weigall, Arthur anasema katika kitabu cha The Paganism in our Christianity …kwamba wazo la utatu liliingizwa na viongozi wa kanisa mnamo karne ya tatu baada ya kuondoka bwana wetu…Vitabu vyote vya Agano la kale na Injili zote nne hakuna fundisho hilo kabisa kama linavyofundishwa makanisani duniani pote siku hizi.

Kitabu cha New Catholic Encyclopaedia tunapata maelezo kwamba mamlaka ya Kanisa husema wazi kwamba ...utatu siyo fundisho la moja kwa moja…ila ni fumbo la imani tu.

Kitabu cha Kikatoliki Trinitas A. Thiolojicar Encyclopandia of the Holy Trinity Tertuliano. Baadhi ya mafundisho yake yalitumiwa na watu wengine…na hutahadharisha kutokua na haraka kuhusu utatu.

Katika vitabu vya New Catholic Encyclopadia na The Encyclopadia of Religion wanathiolojia hukubaliana kwamba katika Biblia hakuna fundisho la utatu… kabisa.

Mwanathiolojia Myeswiti Edmund Fortiman anatueleza katika kitabu cha The Triune God kwamba …katika Agano la Kale hatuoni ushahidi wa mwandishi mtakatifu yeyote anayetuambia lolote kuhusu utatu… uchunguzi wa maandiko Matakatifu ya kiebrania umeonyesha kwamba hakuna fundisho la ajabu jinsi hiyo katika Biblia.

Kitabu cha Encyclopadia Americana kinasema kwamba imani ya utatu lilikuwa fundisho la upotevu tangu Karne ya nne na ni upagani.

Nimekusikia sawa [emoji4] twambie kibuzi [emoji4] kwa Mara ya mwisho umemgeza lini baba yake fatuma [emoji117]
pmm-petdog.jpg


Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
Tazama kile kilichokuwepo kabla na baada ya Yohana 14:8

"Filipo akamwambia, Bwana utuonyesha Baba, yatutosha. Yesu akamwambia, Mimi nimekuwepo pamoja nanyi siku hizi zote, wewe usinijue, Filipo? Aliyeniona mimi amemwona Baba; Basi wewe wasemaje, Utuonyeshe Baba?"

Yesu alimuuliza Filipo vipi nimwonyeshe Mungu kwa wanafunzi, kitu ambacho hakiwezekani. Unatakiwa umwamini Mungu kwa kuheshimu Viumbe vyake: jua, mwezi, viumbe vyote, na Yesu, aliyeumbwa na Mungu.

Yeye amesema katika Yohana 4:24 "Mungu ni Roho....

." na Yohana 5:37 "... Sauti yake hamkuisikia wakati wowote, wala Sura yake hamkuiona."

Vipi utaweza kuona roho?

Kile walichokiona kilikuwa ni Yesu, sio Mungu. Paulo amesema katika 1 Timotheo 6:16

"Ambaye yeye peke yake hapatikani na mauti, amekaa katika nuru isiyoweza kukaribiwa; wala hakuna mwanadamu aliyemwona, wala awezaye kumwona. Heshima na uwezo una yeye hata milele. Amina."

Kwa hiyo kile ukionacho si Mungu.

Qurani inasema katika Sura 6:103 "Macho hayamfikii (kumwona), bali yeye anayafikia macho (kuyaona na kuwaona hao wenye macho). Naye ni Mwenye kujua yaliyofichikana na yaliyo dhahiri."
Sauti anayozungumzia na Yesu hapo. Ni massage. Hilo andiko ni context specific. Fool.

Lets back to hellish qur'an.
Kur'an inasema:-

1. Yesu ni mesenja
2. Yesu ni NENO la Allah.
3. Yesu ni ROHO kutoka kwa allah (i.e. A spirit Preceeding from him).

Imeweka neno 'ING' ili kuonyesha Continuity. Spirit inaendelea kutoka na kutoka na kutoka...


So bibilia inasema NENO akachukua Mwili akawa mwanadamu.

Qur'an inasema NENO la Allah liliwekwa kwa Mariamu.
Qur'na ina mwita Yesu ni "KRISTO."

So Yesu Ni MUNGU

Case closed.



Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
wee baba fatuma aka allah anaswali kala sigda makalio juu kanzu imenasa deki [emoji53] kaja mbwa kakumbuka mchezo wao wa kuingiliana kifisifisi ameanza kumshughulikia [emoji15] wee unaita kwa wanyama [emoji15] sawa umepatia [emoji122] [emoji122] [emoji122] [emoji106] hapo imepenya gharama yake kata.3 [emoji117] View attachment 981919

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
Hatari sana. Khuntha maana yake nn?
 
Nenda nao hivyohivyo kidogokidogo hadi wataaelewa na kuamua Kubatizwa kwa Jina la
(Baba na la Mwana na la Roho Mtakatifu)
Waambia hayo majina matatu yaliyo kwenye Parandesi ni ya Mungu mmoja.
Ni kama mtu mmoja anavyoitwa
( Chacha Mwita Marwa )
Kumbuka hao ni Kondoo wa Kristo hivyo usiwadhihaki bali waelimishe kwa hekima na upole kama unavyofanya.
Na wataelewa tu.
Jesus is God.




Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom