Serikali itunge sheria kuhusu uzazi wa mpango angalau watoto wawili kila familia maana kasi ya uzazi Tanzania inatisha

Serikali itunge sheria kuhusu uzazi wa mpango angalau watoto wawili kila familia maana kasi ya uzazi Tanzania inatisha


Proved said:
Mathanzua na safuher mnakubaliana na hoja ya huyu jamaa ?...
Click to expand...
I strongly advise our African leaders and brethren including Babu la Mji not to blindly trust everything Western so called 'overpopulation experts’ say, and suggests instead that they familiarize themselves with facts and not propaganda and lobbying for hidden agenda.

Many in positions of power think the world is overpopulated, and Africa takes the center of attention because of the constant increase in population.The fact however is that despite recent increases in population,Africa is still sparsely populated when compared to other continents.European countries are nowadays giving incentives to their women to give birth to more babies. Yet, an already underpopulated continent, Africa is crowded with Western ‘experts' giving money to NGOs and governments to stop the population growth.

The debate about the world overpopulation should not be about headcount, but about a single individual’s impact on the environment, and it is necessary to recalculate the ‘overpopulation factor' based on those parameters.

A conference gathered a panel of white people in Paris a while ago to think about more effective ways to reduce black population in Africa. One of the conference organizers, a historian and Associate Professor of African history, Bernard Lugan, said "Population growth in Africa is a threat to European civilization … I'm not recommending to drop a nuclear bomb on Africa, but we can't wait to see that population growth next to Europe. It's a danger we have to take seriously." Their plan is to syndicate more closely private and public organizations in Western countries to provide money and logistics for faster and more effective actions to curb the ‘frightening' African population growth.

This is just surreal, but let's take a calmer road to answer the fundamental question behind such conferences and the numerous similar initiatives in Europe and the United States: is Africa overpopulated? First, what is overpopulation? Overpopulation is an array of negative social and ecological impacts caused by increasing competition between individuals or groups due to the increasing scarcity of resources. The scarcity could be caused either by decreasing resources of water, food and other life necessities because of a growing population, or by overconsumption of those resources due to unhealthy lifestyle or economical ideology. Put simply, overpopulation is caused either by limited resources not enough to sustain the ever-growing population, or by overconsumption due to unhealthy lifestyle. The debate on the world overpopulation has been ongoing for over 150 years. Many in position of power think the world has become overpopulated recently, and Africa takes the center of attention because of the constant increase in population. Often, the people behind the Africa overpopulation debate would produce shiny graphics and complex MBA types of matrix that look very convincing, and indeed would trick people not familiar with the issues into agreeing with their points. Here is a flipped coin perspective you won’t see in the mainstream news outlets.

In the 15th century, Africans represented 17% of the world population. At the beginning of the 20th century, Africans accounted only for a little bit more than 7%. What has happened during these four centuries of depopulation of Africa? You already have the answer. Today, Africans represent only 16% of the world population, less than five centuries ago, while Asians represent more than 60%. Keep in mind that India is more populated than Africa while Africa is nine times the size of India. Bangladesh with half the area of Gabon has 125 million inhabitants, whereas Gabon has barely two million. Congo is 2,345,408 square kilometers, slightly greater than the combined areas of Spain, France, Germany, Sweden, and Norway. The population of Congo is only 68 million; yet, Germany's is about 82 million; Spain, 47 million; France, 66 million; Sweden, ten million; Norway, five million. Now, think of the little island of Britain, three times smaller than Madagascar. If you take the population of South Africa, Zimbabwe, Swaziland and Lesotho, and probably throw in Namibia for good measure, that will bring us up to the population of the UK, if not just under. It means that Europe is the most overpopulated continent in the world. Indeed, the most overpopulated countries per square kilometre are mostly in Europe, regardless of the fact that Europe had shipped over half a billion of its population surplus to two continents: America and Australia. Five centuries ago, there were no Europeans in America, Australia, or Africa. European countries are nowadays giving incentives to their women to give birth to more babies. Yet, an already underpopulated continent, Africa is crowded with Western ‘experts' giving money to NGOs and governments to stop the population growth.

In the meantime, China is abandoning its one-child policy to boost its populace. Here is another perspective that casts the concept of overpopulation as a fraud and a convenient ideology because it voluntary ignores the impact per capita (per one person) and focuses on simple numerical analysis. The problem with the world population is not that we are too ‘heavy' for the Earth to carry, the problem with the world population is the impact of human consumption and activity on the environment and resources. The USA consumes 25% of world resources while its population is under 5%. And the West as a bloc represents less than 15% of the overall world population while consuming over half of world resources and being responsible for 80% of the world climate change factors. When it comes to carbon dioxide emission ('carbon footprint') per person on the global scale, one person in the US emits about 20 tons every year, one person in the European Union emits 11 tons, one person in China emit three tons, and one person in the sub-Saharan Africa emits a maximum of 300 kilograms. Which means the African carbon impact is 66 times less than American, and 36 times less than European. Put simply, the impact of a single American on the environment and his role in furthering the global warming effect is equivalent to that of almost 7,000 Africans. A single European threatens the environment with the ‘force’ of 4,000 Africans. The same goes for the consumption of vital resources like water, meat, etc. For example, the US, with a population around 300 million people, consume as much water per person as China or India which each have above one billion inhabitants. EU countries follow similar patterns. The whole African continent’s population is less than China's alone, and a total GDP the size of a small country like France (France’s 2013 GDP was 2.806 trillion USD vs Africa’s 2.6 trillion in 2013) which is five times smaller than Congo. Looking from that perspective, you can now see why it is convenient for some people to throw dubious numbers out there: attacking poor Africans is such a harmless exercise.

The debate about the world overpopulation should not be about headcount, but about a single individual’s impact on the environment, and it is necessary to recalculate the ‘overpopulation factor' based on those parameters. The world is overpopulated, let’s have less rich people should be the real agenda. There are too many Americans, too many Europeans, too many Australians, too many Japanese, too many Singaporeans, and so on, because they are the people impacting our common planet in the worst way. Only, concerning Africa, we are talking about population reduction strategies funded by Western NGOs and governments. Is it because Africa does not have resources to feed two billion people? No. It is because other nations want those resources for their own people. If you live in Africa, and those Western overpopulation experts come to spread their dubious propaganda, ask them some tough questions and take them as the new Christopher Columbus. I hope they are in the wrong direction, the future requires a different model."
 
Summarize.

"Today, Africans represent only 16% of the world population, less than five centuries ago, while Asians represent more than 60%"
Asia ina jamii nyingi na tofauti sana
Kuna Wachina, Wahindi, Waarabu, Waturuki, Wajapani, Wairan, Waisrael, Wafaghanistan,Wafilipini, Wamalysia na Wapakistani ni logiki na sahihi kabisa wakiwa asilimia kubwa ya dunia. Africa ukiondoa waarabu wa Kaskazini wote tuliobaki ni jamii moja tu ya watu "blacks" sisi tulinganishwe na China au India ambazo ni sawa na sub-continents.

Mathanzua said:
I strongly advise our African brethren not to blindly trust everything Western 'overpopulation experts’ say, and suggests that they familiarize themselves with facts and not lobbying,for hidden agenda.

Many in positions of power think the world has become overpopulated recently, and Africa takes the center of attention because of the constant increase in population.European countries are nowadays giving incentives to their women to give birth to more babies. Yet, an already underpopulated continent, Africa is crowded with Western ‘experts' giving money to NGOs and governments to stop the population growth. The debate about the world overpopulation should not be about headcount, but about a single individual’s impact on the environment, and it is necessary to recalculate the ‘overpopulation factor' based on those parameters. A conference gathered a panel of white people in Paris a while ago to think about more effective ways to reduce black population in Africa. One of the conference organizers, a historian and Associate Professor of African history, Bernard Lugan, said "Population growth in Africa is a threat to European civilization … I'm not recommending to drop a nuclear bomb on Africa, but we can't wait to see that population growth next to Europe. It's a danger we have to take seriously." Their plan is to syndicate more closely private and public organizations in Western countries to provide money and logistics for faster and more effective actions to curb the ‘frightening' African population growth. This is just surreal, but let's take a calmer road to answer the fundamental question behind such conferences and the numerous similar initiatives in Europe and the United States: is Africa overpopulated? First, what is overpopulation? Overpopulation is an array of negative social and ecological impacts caused by increasing competition between individuals or groups due to the increasing scarcity of resources. The scarcity could be caused either by decreasing resources of water, food and other life necessities because of a growing population, or by overconsumption of those resources due to unhealthy lifestyle or economical ideology. Put simply, overpopulation is caused either by limited resources not enough to sustain the ever-growing population, or by overconsumption due to unhealthy lifestyle. The debate on the world overpopulation has been ongoing for over 150 years. Many in position of power think the world has become overpopulated recently, and Africa takes the center of attention because of the constant increase in population. Often, the people behind the Africa overpopulation debate would produce shiny graphics and complex MBA types of matrix that look very convincing, and indeed would trick people not familiar with the issues into agreeing with their points. Here is a flipped coin perspective you won’t see in the mainstream news outlets. In the 15th century, Africans represented 17% of the world population. At the beginning of the 20th century, Africans accounted only for a little bit more than 7%. What has happened during these four centuries of depopulation of Africa? You already have the answer. Today, Africans represent only 16% of the world population, less than five centuries ago, while Asians represent more than 60%. Keep in mind that India is more populated than Africa while Africa is nine times the size of India. Bangladesh with half the area of Gabon has 125 million inhabitants, whereas Gabon has barely two million. Congo is 2,345,408 square kilometers, slightly greater than the combined areas of Spain, France, Germany, Sweden, and Norway. The population of Congo is only 68 million; yet, Germany's is about 82 million; Spain, 47 million; France, 66 million; Sweden, ten million; Norway, five million. Now, think of the little island of Britain, three times smaller than Madagascar. If you take the population of South Africa, Zimbabwe, Swaziland and Lesotho, and probably throw in Namibia for good measure, that will bring us up to the population of the UK, if not just under. Africa is It means that Europe is the most overpopulated continent in the world. Indeed, the most overpopulated countries per square kilometre are mostly in Europe, regardless of the fact that Europe had shipped over half a billion of its population surplus to two continents: America and Australia. Five centuries ago, there were no Europeans in America, Australia, or Africa. European countries are nowadays giving incentives to their women to give birth to more babies. Yet, an already underpopulated continent, Africa is crowded with Western ‘experts' giving money to NGOs and governments to stop the population growth. In the meantime, China is abandoning its one-child policy to boost its populace. Here is another perspective that casts the concept of overpopulation as a fraud and a convenient ideology because it voluntary ignores the impact per capita (per one person) and focuses on simple numerical analysis. The problem with the world population is not that we are too ‘heavy' for the Earth to carry, the problem with the world population is the impact of human consumption and activity on the environment and resources. The USA consumes 25% of world resources while its population is under 5%. And the West as a bloc represents less than 15% of the overall world population while consuming over half of world resources and being responsible for 80% of the world climate change factors. When it comes to carbon dioxide emission ('carbon footprint') per person on the global scale, one person in the US emits about 20 tons every year, one person in the European Union emits 11 tons, one person in China emit three tons, and one person in the sub-Saharan Africa emits a maximum of 300 kilograms. Which means the African carbon impact is 66 times less than American, and 36 times less than European. Put simply, the impact of a single American on the environment and his role in furthering the global warming effect is equivalent to that of almost 7,000 Africans. A single European threatens the environment with the ‘force’ of 4,000 Africans. The same goes for the consumption of vital resources like water, meat, etc. For example, the US, with a population around 300 million people, consume as much water per person as China or India which each have above one billion inhabitants. EU countries follow similar patterns. The whole African continent’s population is less than China's alone, and a total GDP the size of a small country like France (France’s 2013 GDP was 2.806 trillion USD vs Africa’s 2.6 trillion in 2013) which is five times smaller than Congo. Looking from that perspective, you can now see why it is convenient for some people to throw dubious numbers out there: attacking poor Africans is such a harmless exercise. The debate about the world overpopulation should not be about headcount, but about a single individual’s impact on the environment, and it is necessary to recalculate the ‘overpopulation factor' based on those parameters. The world is overpopulated, let’s have less rich people should be the real agenda. There are too many Americans, too many Europeans, too many Australians, too many Japanese, too many Singaporeans, and so on, because they are the people impacting our common planet in the worst way. Only, concerning Africa, we are talking about population reduction strategies funded by Western NGOs and governments. Is it because Africa does not have resources to feed two billion people? No. It is because other nations want those resources for their own people. If you live in Africa, and those Western overpopulation experts come to spread their dubious propaganda, ask them some tough questions and take them as the new Christopher Columbus. I hope you won’t bite on this new covert war on the poor and another distraction from the real culprits. Finally, let me say this to those who are conceiving the African continent to be, look, and consume like Europe and America: "You are going in the wrong direction. The future requires a different model."
Click to expand...
 
Nenda finland walijifanya kuwana uzazi wa mpango la watoto wawili tu sahivi taifa linawazee kupindukia sasa hivi ndoo wanapambana vijana wao wafyatue
 
"The USA consumes 25% of world resources while its population is under 5%. And the West as a bloc represents less than 15% of the overall world population while consuming over half of world resources and being responsible for 80% of the world climate change factors"

Hii inadhihirisha hatuhitaji mabilioni ya watu ili tuwe na maendeleo na tuishi maisha mazuri. Karata muhimu ya maendeleo duniani ni uwezo wa akili na mipango. Wazungu wa Marekani ndio wachache ila wao ndo wanakula shushu na starehe zaidi kuliko binadamu wengine.
Wakati sisi tunapambana kuongeza shule na walimu kila siku kwa idadi ya watu inayoongezeka kwa kasi kila kukicha tunabaki tukitumia mkaa na kuni kama nishati kubwa huko kwao kila mtu yuko na gari na wako na mbio za magari yanayotumia mafuta ambayo magari na mkaa vyote vinatoa moshi wa kuharibu mazingira ila sisi ndio tunateseka zaidi.
Kupanga ni kuchagua.
Mathanzua said:
I strongly advise our African leaders and brethren including Babe not to blindly trust everything Western so called 'overpopulation experts’ say, and suggests that instead they familiarize themselves with facts and not propaganda and lobbying for hidden agenda.

Many in positions of power think the world is overpopulated, and Africa takes the center of attention because of the constant increase in population.European countries are nowadays giving incentives to their women to give birth to more babies. Yet, an already underpopulated continent, Africa is crowded with Western ‘experts' giving money to NGOs and governments to stop the population growth. The debate about the world overpopulation should not be about headcount, but about a single individual’s impact on the environment, and it is necessary to recalculate the ‘overpopulation factor' based on those parameters. A conference gathered a panel of white people in Paris a while ago to think about more effective ways to reduce black population in Africa. One of the conference organizers, a historian and Associate Professor of African history, Bernard Lugan, said "Population growth in Africa is a threat to European civilization … I'm not recommending to drop a nuclear bomb on Africa, but we can't wait to see that population growth next to Europe. It's a danger we have to take seriously." Their plan is to syndicate more closely private and public organizations in Western countries to provide money and logistics for faster and more effective actions to curb the ‘frightening' African population growth. This is just surreal, but let's take a calmer road to answer the fundamental question behind such conferences and the numerous similar initiatives in Europe and the United States: is Africa overpopulated? First, what is overpopulation? Overpopulation is an array of negative social and ecological impacts caused by increasing competition between individuals or groups due to the increasing scarcity of resources. The scarcity could be caused either by decreasing resources of water, food and other life necessities because of a growing population, or by overconsumption of those resources due to unhealthy lifestyle or economical ideology. Put simply, overpopulation is caused either by limited resources not enough to sustain the ever-growing population, or by overconsumption due to unhealthy lifestyle. The debate on the world overpopulation has been ongoing for over 150 years. Many in position of power think the world has become overpopulated recently, and Africa takes the center of attention because of the constant increase in population. Often, the people behind the Africa overpopulation debate would produce shiny graphics and complex MBA types of matrix that look very convincing, and indeed would trick people not familiar with the issues into agreeing with their points. Here is a flipped coin perspective you won’t see in the mainstream news outlets. In the 15th century, Africans represented 17% of the world population. At the beginning of the 20th century, Africans accounted only for a little bit more than 7%. What has happened during these four centuries of depopulation of Africa? You already have the answer. Today, Africans represent only 16% of the world population, less than five centuries ago, while Asians represent more than 60%. Keep in mind that India is more populated than Africa while Africa is nine times the size of India. Bangladesh with half the area of Gabon has 125 million inhabitants, whereas Gabon has barely two million. Congo is 2,345,408 square kilometers, slightly greater than the combined areas of Spain, France, Germany, Sweden, and Norway. The population of Congo is only 68 million; yet, Germany's is about 82 million; Spain, 47 million; France, 66 million; Sweden, ten million; Norway, five million. Now, think of the little island of Britain, three times smaller than Madagascar. If you take the population of South Africa, Zimbabwe, Swaziland and Lesotho, and probably throw in Namibia for good measure, that will bring us up to the population of the UK, if not just under. Africa is It means that Europe is the most overpopulated continent in the world. Indeed, the most overpopulated countries per square kilometre are mostly in Europe, regardless of the fact that Europe had shipped over half a billion of its population surplus to two continents: America and Australia. Five centuries ago, there were no Europeans in America, Australia, or Africa. European countries are nowadays giving incentives to their women to give birth to more babies. Yet, an already underpopulated continent, Africa is crowded with Western ‘experts' giving money to NGOs and governments to stop the population growth. In the meantime, China is abandoning its one-child policy to boost its populace. Here is another perspective that casts the concept of overpopulation as a fraud and a convenient ideology because it voluntary ignores the impact per capita (per one person) and focuses on simple numerical analysis. The problem with the world population is not that we are too ‘heavy' for the Earth to carry, the problem with the world population is the impact of human consumption and activity on the environment and resources. The USA consumes 25% of world resources while its population is under 5%. And the West as a bloc represents less than 15% of the overall world population while consuming over half of world resources and being responsible for 80% of the world climate change factors. When it comes to carbon dioxide emission ('carbon footprint') per person on the global scale, one person in the US emits about 20 tons every year, one person in the European Union emits 11 tons, one person in China emit three tons, and one person in the sub-Saharan Africa emits a maximum of 300 kilograms. Which means the African carbon impact is 66 times less than American, and 36 times less than European. Put simply, the impact of a single American on the environment and his role in furthering the global warming effect is equivalent to that of almost 7,000 Africans. A single European threatens the environment with the ‘force’ of 4,000 Africans. The same goes for the consumption of vital resources like water, meat, etc. For example, the US, with a population around 300 million people, consume as much water per person as China or India which each have above one billion inhabitants. EU countries follow similar patterns. The whole African continent’s population is less than China's alone, and a total GDP the size of a small country like France (France’s 2013 GDP was 2.806 trillion USD vs Africa’s 2.6 trillion in 2013) which is five times smaller than Congo. Looking from that perspective, you can now see why it is convenient for some people to throw dubious numbers out there: attacking poor Africans is such a harmless exercise. The debate about the world overpopulation should not be about headcount, but about a single individual’s impact on the environment, and it is necessary to recalculate the ‘overpopulation factor' based on those parameters. The world is overpopulated, let’s have less rich people should be the real agenda. There are too many Americans, too many Europeans, too many Australians, too many Japanese, too many Singaporeans, and so on, because they are the people impacting our common planet in the worst way. Only, concerning Africa, we are talking about population reduction strategies funded by Western NGOs and governments. Is it because Africa does not have resources to feed two billion people? No. It is because other nations want those resources for their own people. If you live in Africa, and those Western overpopulation experts come to spread their dubious propaganda, ask them some tough questions and take them as the new Christopher Columbus. I hope they are in the wrong direction, the future requires a different model."
Click to expand...
 
RWANDES said:
Nenda finland walijifanya kuwana uzazi wa mpango la watoto wawili tu sahivi taifa linawazee kupindukia sasa hivi ndoo wanapambana vijana wao wafyatue
Click to expand...
Sisi tuliofyatua bila mpango tunawasaidiaje vijana wetu wanaokosa ajira sasa hivi? Wanasoma mpaka chuo kikuu wanabaki kuwa machinga na mama ntilie. Tungewasaidia kwanza vijana na watoto tulionao kabla ya kufyatua wengine.
 
I strongly advise our African leaders and brethren including you Babu la Mji not to blindly trust everything Western so called 'overpopulation experts’ say, and suggests instead that they familiarize themselves with facts and not propaganda and lobbying for hidden agenda.

Many in positions of power think the world is overpopulated, and Africa takes the center of attention because of the constant increase in population.The fact however is that despite recent increases in population,Africa is still sparsely populated when compared to other continents.European countries are nowadays giving incentives to their women to give birth to more babies. Yet, an already underpopulated continent, Africa is crowded with Western ‘experts' giving money to NGOs and governments to stop the population growth.

The debate about the world overpopulation should not be about headcount, but about a single individual’s impact on the environment, and it is necessary to recalculate the ‘overpopulation factor' based on those parameters.

A conference gathered a panel of white people in Paris a while ago to think about more effective ways to reduce black population in Africa. One of the conference organizers, a historian and Associate Professor of African history, Bernard Lugan, said "Population growth in Africa is a threat to European civilization … I'm not recommending to drop a nuclear bomb on Africa, but we can't wait to see that population growth next to Europe. It's a danger we have to take seriously." Their plan is to syndicate more closely private and public organizations in Western countries to provide money and logistics for faster and more effective actions to curb the ‘frightening' African population growth.

This is just surreal, but let's take a calmer road to answer the fundamental question behind such conferences and the numerous similar initiatives in Europe and the United States: is Africa overpopulated? First, what is overpopulation? Overpopulation is an array of negative social and ecological impacts caused by increasing competition between individuals or groups due to the increasing scarcity of resources. The scarcity could be caused either by decreasing resources of water, food and other life necessities because of a growing population, or by overconsumption of those resources due to unhealthy lifestyle or economical ideology. Put simply, overpopulation is caused either by limited resources not enough to sustain the ever-growing population, or by overconsumption due to unhealthy lifestyle. The debate on the world overpopulation has been ongoing for over 150 years. Many in position of power think the world has become overpopulated recently, and Africa takes the center of attention because of the constant increase in population. Often, the people behind the Africa overpopulation debate would produce shiny graphics and complex MBA types of matrix that look very convincing, and indeed would trick people not familiar with the issues into agreeing with their points. Here is a flipped coin perspective you won’t see in the mainstream news outlets.

In the 15th century, Africans represented 17% of the world population. At the beginning of the 20th century, Africans accounted only for a little bit more than 7%. What has happened during these four centuries of depopulation of Africa? You already have the answer. Today, Africans represent only 16% of the world population, less than five centuries ago, while Asians represent more than 60%. Keep in mind that India is more populated than Africa while Africa is nine times the size of India. Bangladesh with half the area of Gabon has 125 million inhabitants, whereas Gabon has barely two million. Congo is 2,345,408 square kilometers, slightly greater than the combined areas of Spain, France, Germany, Sweden, and Norway. The population of Congo is only 68 million; yet, Germany's is about 82 million; Spain, 47 million; France, 66 million; Sweden, ten million; Norway, five million. Now, think of the little island of Britain, three times smaller than Madagascar. If you take the population of South Africa, Zimbabwe, Swaziland and Lesotho, and probably throw in Namibia for good measure, that will bring us up to the population of the UK, if not just under. It means that Europe is the most overpopulated continent in the world. Indeed, the most overpopulated countries per square kilometre are mostly in Europe, regardless of the fact that Europe had shipped over half a billion of its population surplus to two continents: America and Australia. Five centuries ago, there were no Europeans in America, Australia, or Africa. European countries are nowadays giving incentives to their women to give birth to more babies. Yet, an already underpopulated continent, Africa is crowded with Western ‘experts' giving money to NGOs and governments to stop the population growth.

In the meantime, China is abandoning its one-child policy to boost its populace. Here is another perspective that casts the concept of overpopulation as a fraud and a convenient ideology because it voluntary ignores the impact per capita (per one person) and focuses on simple numerical analysis. The problem with the world population is not that we are too ‘heavy' for the Earth to carry, the problem with the world population is the impact of human consumption and activity on the environment and resources. The USA consumes 25% of world resources while its population is under 5%. And the West as a bloc represents less than 15% of the overall world population while consuming over half of world resources and being responsible for 80% of the world climate change factors. When it comes to carbon dioxide emission ('carbon footprint') per person on the global scale, one person in the US emits about 20 tons every year, one person in the European Union emits 11 tons, one person in China emit three tons, and one person in the sub-Saharan Africa emits a maximum of 300 kilograms. Which means the African carbon impact is 66 times less than American, and 36 times less than European. Put simply, the impact of a single American on the environment and his role in furthering the global warming effect is equivalent to that of almost 7,000 Africans. A single European threatens the environment with the ‘force’ of 4,000 Africans. The same goes for the consumption of vital resources like water, meat, etc. For example, the US, with a population around 300 million people, consume as much water per person as China or India which each have above one billion inhabitants. EU countries follow similar patterns. The whole African continent’s population is less than China's alone, and a total GDP the size of a small country like France (France’s 2013 GDP was 2.806 trillion USD vs Africa’s 2.6 trillion in 2013) which is five times smaller than Congo. Looking from that perspective, you can now see why it is convenient for some people to throw dubious numbers out there: attacking poor Africans is such a harmless exercise.

The debate about the world overpopulation should not be about headcount, but about a single individual’s impact on the environment, and it is necessary to recalculate the ‘overpopulation factor' based on those parameters. The world is overpopulated, let’s have less rich people should be the real agenda. There are too many Americans, too many Europeans, too many Australians, too many Japanese, too many Singaporeans, and so on, because they are the people impacting our common planet in the worst way. Only, concerning Africa, we are talking about population reduction strategies funded by Western NGOs and governments. Is it because Africa does not have resources to feed two billion people? No. It is because other nations want those resources for their own people. If you live in Africa, and those Western overpopulation experts come to spread their dubious propaganda, ask them some tough questions and take them as the new Christopher Columbus. I hope they are in the wrong direction, the future requires a different model."
 
Yoda said:
Tujizuie tuzae watoto wasiozidi wawili ili Tutengeneze kwanza miondombinu na huduma za msingi za kijamii ziwe nzuri kisha tutarudi kufyatua hata 10,Sera ya Uzazi wa mpango wa mtoto 1 ya China miaka ya 1980 hadi 2015 ilikuwa ni ya lazima na ilitekelezwa kikatili sana, sisi serikali sio lazima itumie nguvu na ukatili kuna sera nyingi mbadala inaweza kutumia kufanikisha hilo.
Click to expand...
Wanataka udikiteta kama wa china lakiji wakiambiwa Uzazi wa mpango kama wa china wanaruka kimanga🤣
 
Bepari2020 said:
Sisi tuliofyatua bila mpango tunawasaidiaje vijana wetu wanaokosa ajira sasa hivi? Wanasoma mpaka chuo kikuu wanabaki kuwa machinga na mama ntilie. Tungewasaidia kwanza vijana na watoto tulionao kabla ya kufyatua wengine.
Click to expand...
Ndio madhara ya kufyatua na serikali iliyowagiza imewatelekeza
 
Bepari2020 said:
Sisi tuliofyatua bila mpango tunawasaidiaje vijana wetu wanaokosa ajira sasa hivi? Wanasoma mpaka chuo kikuu wanabaki kuwa machinga na mama ntilie. Tungewasaidia kwanza vijana na watoto tulionao kabla ya kufyatua wengine.
Click to expand...
Waende wakalime ardhi imejaa,wabuni miradi!Tatizo ni kwamba tunachagua kazi.Fanya chochote,bora mkono uende kinywani.
 
Rasterman said:
Wanataka udikiteta kama wa china lakiji wakiambiwa Uzazi wa mpango kama wa china wanaruka kimanga🤣
Click to expand...
Hakuna anayetaka u-dictator kama wa China na uzazi wa mpango.Uzazi wa mpango ni genocide ya dhahiri,nobody wants that.
 
Yoda said:
Unafahamu watoto wengi wa vijijini ndio wanaongoza kwa udumavu na kwashakoo??
Hizo stories zenu za maisha kijijini ni kama peponi huwa mnazitoa wapi? Nchi hii maisha ni magumu zaidi vijijini kuliko mijini na umaskini mkubwa uko vijijini zaidi.
Click to expand...
Udumavu ni siasa za NGOs kula pesa za donors. Vijijini wanakula vyakula vya aina mbalimbali na hawana kipimo.
Nenda familia za mjini Asubuhi mkate na kikombe kidogo cha chai ya rangi, mchana ugali dagaa na mchicha, jioni wali maharage na kipande (robo) cha chungwa. Ikinunuliwa nyama vinahesabiwa vipande. Matokeo yake ndo hayo nguvu hafifu za kiume.
 
Haya ndio matatizo ya kuwa karibu na mabeberu.

Lazima tu watakupa masharti ya ajabu ajabu kama haya.

Yaani wanafurahi mno kuona mtu ukiwa submissive kwao.
 
Statesman said:
Haya ndio matatizo ya kuwa karibu na mabeberu.

Lazima tu watakupa masharti ya ajabu ajabu kama haya.

Yaani wanafurahi mno kuona mtu ukiwa submissive kwao.
Click to expand...
Halafu mleta mada hajaeleweka , ana maana Kila mtu azae watoto wawili au Kila mwanamke azae watoto wawili?
Watz wote siyo wagalatia ajue.

Sent from my TECNO BB2 using JamiiForums mobile app
 
Kwa nini unatofautisha mtu na mwanamke?

Kuna njia mbalimbali za kufanikisha hili

1.Serikali inaweza kuongeza umri wa ndoa hadi miaka 21
2.Serikali inaweza kutoa elimu bure na scholarships kwa watoto wawili tu kwa wengine wa ziada ikaweka ada kubwa. Pia ikatoa mikopo ya elimu kwa familia zenye watoto wawili tu.
3.Serikali inaweza kutoa nafuu ya kodi kwa familia zenye watoto wawili tu.
4.Serikali inaweza kutoa huduma bure za uzazi kwa familia zenye watoto wawili tu na wengine baada hapo wakaweka gharama kubwa.
Kadhi Mkuu 1 said:
Halafu mleta mada hajaeleweka , ana maana Kila mtu azae watoto wawili au Kila mwanamke azae watoto wawili?
Watz wote siyo wagalatia ajue.

Sent from my TECNO BB2 using JamiiForums mobile app
Click to expand...
 
Hili naliunga mkono ,Kuna watu wanazaa sana wakati uwezo wa kuwalea kusomesha hawana, yaani mtu hana kazi,hana shamba hata la nusu heka ,lakini ana watoto kumi matokeo yake anwafanya wawe omba omba,kuzunguka kila Kona kuomba ,chakula tu ni shida,je mahitaji mengine yatawezekana?matokeo yake ndio hao kina panya road,

Na wanakamsemo kao ka kijinga sana,utasikia eti "kila mtoto anakuja na riziki yake" wanadhani riziki huwa zinaangushwa kutoka mbinguni,

Mababu zetu zamani walikuwa wanajiweza ,ndio maana walikuwa na wake wengi na walizaa watoto wengi, mtu ana mashamba heka 100, nusu analima mazao ya chakula nusu ya biashara, na ana ng'ombe 300 atashindwaje kulea watoto 16? na ndio mana wazee wetu walijifunza stadi za kazi nyumbani kwa vitendo,
Hawa wa sasa wanajifunza wizi,husuda,chuki,vijicho ,kuombaomba na uchawi,
Akiomba akinyimwa basi atajenga chuki, na ndio tabia wanazokuwa nazo hizo
Uzazi wa mpango ni muhimu ili kujenga Taifa la kesho na si kujenga Taifa la hovyo
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Our Community

Regional Communities

Back
Top Bottom
Menu
Forums
New posts
Log in
Register