hamis77
JF-Expert Member
- Aug 20, 2013
- 13,628
- 20,992
- Thread starter
-
- #41
UNAKIMBIA HOJA YAKO KIJANJA ,HALAFU HAPO HIZO HOJA ZA NEWTON NDIO HIZO HIZO ZIMEELEZWA KWENYE WAEBRANIA SURA YA KWANZATurudi hapa Umeweka kipande kidogo tu huja elezea maelezo marefu ya Newton, Umeweka kipande kidogo halafu uka tumia Tafsiri yako mwenyewe na ku ignore alichozungumza Newton mwenyewe?
Kuna point 12 ambazo Newton mwenyewe ameelezea Mahusiano baina ya Father and son kama ifuatavyo
Sasa kama Newton hii ndio Tafsiri yake ya Son, ukisoma no 10 hapo God ni Almighty, Nguvu yote inatoka kwa Father na bila Father son is nothing, hii ni doctrine sawa na waisilamu kwamba Mitume wana nguvu ila nguvu zote zinatoka kwa Mungu na bila Mungu hawawezi fanya chochote.
- The word God is nowhere in the scriptures used to signify more than one of the three persons at once.
- The word God put absolutely without restriction to the Son or Holy Ghost doth always signify the Father from one end of the scriptures to the other.
- Whenever it is said in the scriptures that there is but one God, it is meant the Father.
- When, after some heretics had taken Christ for a mere man and others for the supreme God, St John in his Gospel endeavoured to state his nature so that men might have from thence a right apprehension of him and avoid those heresies and to that end calls him the word or logos: we must suppose that he intended that term in the sense that it was taken in the world before he used it when in like manner applied to an intelligent being. For if the Apostles had not used words as they found them how could they expect to have been rightly understood. Now the term logos before St John wrote, was generally used in the sense of the Platonists, when applied to an intelligent being and the Arians understood it in the same sense, and therefore theirs is the true sense of St John.
- The Son in several places confesseth his dependence on the will of the Father.
- The Son confesseth the Father greater, then calls him his God etc.
- The Son acknowledgeth the original prescience of all future things to be in the Father only.
- There is nowhere mention of a human soul in our Saviour besides the word, by the meditation of which the word should be incarnate. But the word itself was made flesh and took upon him the form of a servant.
- It was the son of God which He sent into the world and not a human soul that suffered for us. If there had been such a human soul in our Saviour, it would have been a thing of too great consequence to have been wholly omitted by the Apostles.
- It is a proper epithet of the Father to be called almighty. For by God almighty we always understand the Father. Yet this is not to limit the power of the Son. For he doth whatsoever he seeth the Father do; but to acknowledge that all power is originally in the Father and that the Son hath power in him but what he derives from the Father, for he professes that of himself he can do nothing.
- The Son in all things submits his will to the will of the Father, which could be unreasonable if he were equal to the Father.
- The union between him and the Father he interprets to be like that of the saints with one another. That is in agreement of will and counsel.
UNASEMA WAISLAMU MNAAMINI HIVO ,ACHA UTAPELI
NYIE MNAAMINI YESU NI MWANA WA MUNGU?
WAPI NEWTON ALIMTAMBUA TAPELI MUDY?