KUTOKA KUWA MFUGWA GUANTANAMO KUWA MWANAMAPINDUZI YA KULETA DEMOKRASIA LIBYA...
'US too broke for real war on Libya'
Sat May 7, 2011 4:15PM
The US has resorted to stirring conflict between the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, al-Qaeda, and anti-Gaddafi tribes because it is simply "too broke and isolated to mount any serious form of land effort in Libya," a historian says.
Press TV has conducted an interview with American Author and Historian, Webster Tarpley to further discuss the matter.
Press TV: The Libyan Transitional Council has recently shown its road map towards democracy as far as Libya goes at this meeting of the contact group in Libya. What they outlined was, elections to be held despite Gaddafi staying in power. What do you make of that?
Webster Tarpley:
We have to remember that this Benghazi-rebel council, I would simply call them the 'NATO puppets' are not revolutionaries in any sense. This group around [President of the rebel council, Mustafa Abdul] Jalil, [the rebel's military Chief of Staff Abd Al Fattah] Yunis, and Hester, now they are people who are co-sponsored by MI6, by the CIA, by the French DGSE, and with the input from the National Endowment for Democracy, as was quite correctly mentioned. But the embarrassment for the Western government is that this group is chuck full of al-Qaeda operatives and former veterans of the Libyan-Islamic fighting group, people who have been prisoners of war of the US and Pakistan and or have been held in Guantanamo Bay are now in command of cities like Benghazi.
I think it's going to be very hard to transfer money to such a group of dubious characters. Hilary Clinton obviously wants to give these people at least a good chunk of the USD 33 billion that the US has seized. There is evidence that they have already been stealing oil and selling it with the help of Qatar out there in the [Persian] Gulf, but the word I had was that the rebels were about three to four weeks away from going bankrupt, so they need a cash infusion, and I'm not sure that they have it, because what they have seems to be humanitarian aid.
I think the other side, the military side, from NATO circles we now hear that the bombing has reached an impact that these NATO circles speaking through various academics and so forth, want a new United Nations resolution that would allow them to the ground invasion that we just heard of Obama promising that he would never go with.
So, certainly the danger therefore of the ground war, and just let me add that here in Washington, we have a mood of what I call hysteria, psychosis and euphoria all mixed. Having mainly to do with this bin Laden story, being too complex to go into. I think now it will be fairly easy for his handlers to get Obama to sign paperwork for some kind of invasion of Libya, but I would also warn that would be yet another disaster for the US, given the obvious strategic problems of Libya.
Press TV: Well, then all this brings us back to the fact that the UN mandate does not require a regime change, however, any success that can be measured on the ground will only come through a viable regime change.
Webster Tarpley: Well, the regime change is illegal ...............................
SOURCES>>>>
PressTV - 'US too broke for real war on Libya'