That you can or cannot prove without evidence is debatable, certainly one point of debate would be what is your definition of evidence. A number of questions arise, one being, can you have evidence in abstract and complex mathematical proofs?
There is no debate when it comes to proof without evidence. You can not draw a certain conclusion without making an observation first. hence it goes without say that, you can not prove without evidence!! even in mathematics i understand it is within your knowledge that, propositions is the essence of mathematics, so once you have affirmed something for discussion itself suffice evidence of proof, where the conclusion of the discussion will be the result of the proposition. No proof without evidence.
But even if you cannot prove without evidence, that does not equate evidence with proof just as much as the fact that you cannot be in Dar es salaam without being in Tanzania does not equate Dar es salaam to Tanzania.
Where did you derive this??
A simple class in set theory would do much to benefit your clouded assertion.
Do we always have to base our arguments on math theorems??
Even more confused jumbles.
a) I have not claimed anywhere that you have failed to prove that god does not exist. I challenge you to prove that anything that does not exist, does not exist.
b)You still do not understand my argument (complete with a challenge you haven't tackled) that that which does not exist cannot be proved that it does not exist, because it does not exist and therefore cannot be proved in any way.
c) I was right to think that you are a dingbat and cannot understand my arguments. Your questions show that.
Proof of a negative can be achieved if one could attempt to use evidence and induction to support a claim that he is biased toward, such as a claim that something does not exist. You have asserted a claim that God does not exist, i invited you to support your claim with evidence that he does not exist, until now you have not done so.
If asking for proof that god exists is a belief, then a baldhead is a style of hairdo.
Failure to prove existence can be termed as Faith, but my claims are nowhere near to that, as i have come forward with evidence to prove that he does exist. Now my friend your failure to prove that he does not, makes you a hopeless individual , with unsupported conclusions and saddened faith. You need to come to your senses.
You don't even understand the difference between evidence and proof, yet you scream that I am the one without understanding?
From which statement did you make that conclusion??
Can you prove god exists?
I have enough proof can you disprove.