Hata nyie mnaojitia hamuna dini ni eidha upumbavu ama wapumbavu msio jielewa
Juzi marekani walitoa hukumu kuna mwanadada anyongwe
Na akachomwa sindano ya sumu ingawaje hakufa
Marekani walitumia dini ipi kutoa hukumu ya kifo dhidi ya yule mwanamke???
Kwa nini unatoa mfano wa Marekani?
Marekani ndiyo mfano wa nchi isiyo na udini? Mbona Marekani ina udini sana tu?
Hiyo Marekani unaielewa historia yake, mifumo yake ya sheria, na udini uliopo katika mifumo yake?
Unaelewa Marekani si majimbo yote yana hukumu ya kifo?
Unaelewa hiyo hukumu imetolewa jimbo la Tennessee? Unaelewa hilo ni jimbo lenye wahafidhina wa kidini wengi?
Kwani Marekani ndiyo nchi ya mfano ya watu wasioamini dini?
Mbona Marekani ni kati ya nchi yenye wahafidhina wengi wa kidini?
Unaelewa kuwa kuna wahafidhina wengi sana mpaka kwenye Supreme Court ya Marekani wanaoamini kuwa Marekani imeanzishwa na inatakiwa kuendeshwa kwenye misingi ya Kikristo?
Ushawahi kumsoma mtu anaitwa Justice Antonin Scalia?
Marekani ni nchi yenye wahafidhina wenye mawazo ya kidini kibao, na wengi wanaamini nchi yao inaendeshwa kwa misingi ya Kikristo, na hiyo hukumu wanaihalalisha kwa kufuata misingi ya hukumu za jino kwa jino za Ukristo.
Huelewi wapi?
Zaidi, unapouliza wanatumia dini gani,
kwa nini watumie dini?
Ule ni mfumo wao wa kimahakama kumhukumu muuaji.
Sasa unafananisha mfumo wa kimahakama kumuua muuaji, na mhafidhina gaidi anayetaka kuua watu wasio na hatia?
Unajua hata jinsi ya kulinganisha wewe, au dini ineshakuharibu akili na wewe?
Soma muhtasari hapa (Meta AI).
Question.
Did Scalia believe that the US was founded on Judeo-Christian principles?
Answer.
Yes, in the accommodationist sense - though he framed it as a historical and legal tradition, not just a personal belief.
Justice Scalia consistently argued:
1. The American tradition allows government to favor religion over non-religion.
He said there is "no place" in the constitutional tradition for the idea that the state must be neutral between religion and its absence. The neutrality the framers intended, he said, "is not neutrality between religiousness and non-religiousness; it is between denominations of religion." 1d48
2. The Ten Commandments and God are part of that tradition.
He wrote that displays of the Ten Commandments around the Supreme Court and government buildings establish an understanding "that the Ten Commandments are a foundation of the rule of law, and a symbol of the role that religion played, and continues to play, in our system of government." 28d3
In oral argument he put it more directly: when people see such a monument, it's "a symbol of the fact that government comes - derives its authority from God. And that is, it seems to me, an appropriate symbol to be on State grounds." b493
3. Public honoring of God is part of why he thought America succeeded.
In a 2014 speech at Archbishop Rummel High School, he said:
"That we won the revolution was extraordinary. The Battle of Midway was extraordinary. I think one of the reasons God has been good to us is that we have done him honor. Unlike the other countries of the world that do not even invoke his name we do him honor. In presidential addresses, in Thanksgiving proclamations and in many other ways," fb40
He also argued in dissent in
McCreary County v. ACLU that publicly honoring the Ten Commandments is indistinguishable from publicly honoring God, and that because Christianity, Judaism and Islam - "which combined account for 97.7% of all believers" - all believe the Commandments were given by God, such honors "cannot be reasonably understood as a government endorsement of a particular religious viewpoint."