GE2025 Jaji Hamidu Mwanga akataa kujitoa kwenye kesi ya CHADEMA

Matukio, Taarifa, Habari na Mijadala ya Wananchi WAKATI wa Mchakato wa Uchaguzi Mkuu 2025
Chadomo wameangukia pua. Wanadhani wanaweza kufanya bullying kwa kila mtu na kila taasisi. No Reporn No Errection.
 
Pilato alitaka kujitoa wayahudi wakamtisha “ ukijitoa hautakuwa RAFIKI wa Kaisari”

Ilikuwa mwaka 0001 AC 😂 sasa ni 2025 AC
Hata kwenye haya naona unababaisha tu!
Itakuwaje 0001, badala ya 0030 AD?
 
Mbegese, huwezi kuchagua Jaji unayemtaka kama unachagua maembe sokoni
 
Ndio ukweli.
Sawa.
Mbowe ndiye alimpanga Jaji Mwanga asikilize kesi ya Chadema.

Mbowe ndiye aliyewaambia Chadema wasipeleke mawakili mahakamani hadi kesi ikasikilizwa upande mmoja.

Sioni Chadema hii ikitoboa October election kwasababu ya kumwamini Lissu ambaye aliwekeza zaidi kumwondosha Mbowe na si CCM.
 
Naamini Wanasheria na THINK TANkERS wq CHADEMA wataenda kutafakari na kuja na MPANGO thabiti kabisa..Haki huchelewa tu, lakini itafika
 
Hakuna kujitoa katika kesi hakuna kukimbia uchaguzi
 
CHADEMA Bara si mkae na wenzenu wa Visiwani muyamalize? Ruzuku yote mle nyie, Rasilimali za Chama mzitumie nyie tu, hata tone tone yote mnakula nyie, HUU NI UUNGWANAA?
 
Hata kwenye haya naona unababaisha tu!
Itakuwaje 0001, badala ya 0030 AD?
Nazungumzia mambo hayo yalianza mwanzoni mwa kalenda

Ningetaka kuweka tarehe ya hukumu ingesomeka 0033 AC 😄✔️🇮🇱
 

Ameshapakwa matope atafutiwe kazi nyingine tu hataweza kuaminiwa na mtu
 
Yaani kwamba kwakuwa cdm hawakupeleka mawakili ndio sababu? Hiyo ni kesi ya kupanga, wangepeleka wasingepeleka bado maamuzi yangekuwa hayo hayo. Mfano halisi ni huyo jaji kugoma kujitoa, hiyo ni dhahiri ni kesi yenye nia ovu. Aliyekuambia cdm isiposhiriki huo uhuni uitwao uchaguzi itasambarika ni nani?
 
Naomba mwendelezo
 
Apparently, my initial research has landed into the case of Zablon Pangalameza v. Joachim Kiwaraka [1987] TLR 140. In this case the court held that judicial administration is based on trust, therefore, once a prayer of recusal is made the judicial officer should recuse himself even if there is no founded grounds for recusal. The learned Justices of appeal observed that;


"The safest thing to do for a judicial officer, who finds his integrity questioned by litigants or accused persons before him, is to give the benefit of doubt to his irrational accusers and retire from the case unless it is quite clear from the surrounding circumstances and the history of the case that the accused is employing delaying tactics. Apart from ensuring that justice is seen to be done, he saves himself from unnecessary embarrassment."
 
Anang'ang'ania kwani yeye ni jaji pekee? Huu ujaji siku hisi wanaupataje. Tuliaminishwa jaji ni mtu mwenye busara
 
Ifike wakati hawa watu kushughulika nao kwa njia za asili na majini mambo yasiwe mengi
 
Huyu Mwanga pamoja na Mutungi ni majaji MAFALA kuwahi kutokea nchini🚮🚮🚮🚮
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…