Je wajua Dini ya Uislamu ni zaidi ya sayansi?

[Inch 9]

Ok, kwa hiyo kile alichokifanya Yesu kinaitwaje kama sio uumbaji

Nyie mnatakiwa kabla ya kuanza kujadiliana nanyi yafaa tupime Akili zenu kwanza.

Unapozungumzia kuumba inahusisha kufanya kitu kipya au kwa mara ya kwanza baada ya hapo inakuwa kuunda hao ndege unaowazunigumzia hata wachina wanaweza kufanya alichokifanya Yesu ila itakuwa kwa njia nyingine na vifaa tofauti na ndio maana kuna michele ya kutengeneza nyama za kutengeneza na nywele za kutengeneza kwa Akili yao tuseme hao waliotengeneza hivyo vitu tuseme nao wameviumba?

 

[Clever505]

Kabla yakuanza mjadala naomba nipime Akili yako kwa maswali haya:

(1)Unaelewa maana ya machwea-jua?

(2)Umewahi kusafiri na usafiri wowote wa Maji?

Ingekuwa jambo jema kwanza ukajibu hoja maana ulitaka Aya, Aya imekuja then unaleta maelezo mengine. Jibu swali ndo nawe uulize. Sawa ndugu muislam?

Jibu hoja. Akili yangu utaipima kwenye kuelewa jibu lako.

 

[Clever505]

Nyie mnatakiwa kabla ya kuanza kujadiliana nanyi yafaa tupime Akili zenu kwanza.

Unapozungumzia kuumba inahusisha kufanya kitu kipya au kwa mara ya kwanza baada ya hapo inakuwa kuunda hao ndege unaowazunigumzia hata wachina wanaweza kufanya alichokifanya Yesu ila itakuwa kwa njia nyingine na vifaa tofauti na ndio maana kuna michele ya kutengeneza nyama za kutengeneza na nywele za kutengeneza kwa Akili yao tuseme hao waliotengeneza hivyo vitu tuseme nao wameviumba?

Kwamba na mchina anaweza kuweka pumzi na ndege akaruka akawa kiumbe hai ama vipi? We endelea kujibu hoja nadhani humohumo ndo utajua uwezo wa akili ya mtu, usiwe na papara.

 

[Inch 9]

Ingekuwa jambo jema kwanza ukajibu hoja maana ulitaka Aya, Aya imekuja then unaleta maelezo mengine. Jibu swali ndo nawe uulize. Sawa ndugu muislam?

Jibu hoja. Akili yangu utaipima kwenye kuelewa jibu lako.

Kwanza Quran wametelemshiwa wenye Akili na ndio maana wasio na Akili hawawezi kuielewa ndiyo pale mimi nikataka kupima Akili yako nilishajua mwenye Akili hawezi kuuliza Swali kama lako.

 

[Inch 9]

Kwamba na mchina anaweza kuweka pumzi na ndege akaruka akawa kiumbe hai ama vipi? We endelea kujibu hoja nadhani humohumo ndo utajua uwezo wa akili ya mtu, usiwe na papara.

Pumzi ni nini?

 

[Inch 9]

Kwamba na mchina anaweza kuweka pumzi na ndege akaruka akawa kiumbe hai ama vipi? We endelea kujibu hoja nadhani humohumo ndo utajua uwezo wa akili ya mtu, usiwe na papara.

Sio Mchina panda boti nenda pemba kuna wazee zaidi ya mmoja wanatengeneza njiwa anaruka popote unapotaka wewe anaenda tena kwa maelekezo yako.

 

[matunduizi]

Hii ni imani ambayo isingetumia shurti, vitisho na ubabe ingekufa siku alipokufa muasisi wake.

 

[Inch 9]

Hii ni imani ambayo isingetumia shurti, vitisho na ubabe ingekufa siku alipokufa muasisi wake.

Ingekufa kufaje toa ushahidi.

 

[implicit memory]

Theist Wanakuambia Hatutaki tena Mungu — tunayo sayansi wana sema:

"Dini ilieleza radi sayansi inaieleza vizuri zaidi.”
“Siku moja, sayansi itajibu kila kitu.”

Theist wajue kwamba, Sayansi ni utafiti wa jinsi ulimwengu unavyofanya kazi. Inachunguza, Inapima, Inatabiri. Inajaribu. Lakini sayansi haijibu wala haiwezi kujibu kwa mfano haiwezi kujibu haya:

1.Kwa nini ulimwengu upo kabisa? 2.Kwa nini kuna sheria za asili kabisa?
3.Kwa nini kuna kitu badala ya kutokuwa na kitu?
4. Kusudi la maisha ni nini?
Nini hutokea baada ya kifo?

Sayansi hueleza mfumo Lakini haiwezi kueleza maana.

Inaweza kukuambia mvua inavyonyesha - Lakini si nani anayeiteremsha kwa rehema.

Inaweza kueleza jinsi mtoto anavyoumbwa —Lakini si kwa nini uhai unaanza tumboni.

Inaweza kueleza mapigo ya moyo — Lakini si kwa nini moyo uliumbwa.

Einstein — ambaye hakuwa mtu wa dini — aliwahi kusema:

Sayansi bila dini ni kilema. Hata mwanafizikia asiyeamini Mungu, Paul Davies, alikiri:
Sayansi haiwezi kueleza kwa nini sheria za fizikia zipo... wala kwa nini zimepangwa kwa ukamilifu ili kuhimili uhai.”

Hapo ndipo uabudu wa sayansi (scientism) theist — imani kuwa sayansi pekee inaweza kueleza ukweli wote — unashindwa kabisa.

Kwa sababu:

Sayansi haiwezi kukuambia lipi sahihi au lisilo sahihi.

Sayansi haiwezi kuthibitisha upendo, uzuri, au haki.

Sayansi haiwezi kueleza kwa nini unalia kwa kifo — ingawa ubongo wako “unajua” ni atomi tu.

Sayansi haiwezi kusema kwa nini unajali ukweli hata kidogo.

Lakini Uislamu unaweza Uislamu unakupa vyote:

— Akili ya kuchunguza uumbaji
— Na roho ya kuunganika na Muumbaji
"Hakika katika uumbaji wa mbingu na ardhi… kuna ishara kwa watu wenye akili.”
— [Qur’an 3:190]

“Sema: Mnaona mnaowaabudu badala ya Allah? Nionyesheni walichoumba katika ardhi.”
— [Qur’an 46:4]

Uislamu hauifanyi sayansi kuwa Mungu.

Kwa sababu darubini haiwezi kuchukua nafasi ya ujumbe,
Wala hadubini haiwezi kuchukua nafasi ya ukweli.

Kwa hiyo — sayansi haijachukua nafasi ya Mungu.
Inachofanya ni kufafunua ishara za nguvu Zake.

Kwa ufupi Uislamu ni zaidi ya sayansi wanakupa vyote wakati sayanasi inakupa process sio asili na sababu.
Nb.

Soma upate maarifa sio lazima ucomment au uliza tu suali kuendana na mada hiyo.

Huo ndio ukweli

 

[matunduizi]

Ingekufa kufaje toa ushahidi.

Vitu vyake vingi ni vya kukariri havina ushahidi

 

[One day one time]

Theist Wanakuambia Hatutaki tena Mungu — tunayo sayansi wana sema:

"Dini ilieleza radi sayansi inaieleza vizuri zaidi.”
“Siku moja, sayansi itajibu kila kitu.”

Theist wajue kwamba, Sayansi ni utafiti wa jinsi ulimwengu unavyofanya kazi. Inachunguza, Inapima, Inatabiri. Inajaribu. Lakini sayansi haijibu wala haiwezi kujibu kwa mfano haiwezi kujibu haya:

1.Kwa nini ulimwengu upo kabisa? 2.Kwa nini kuna sheria za asili kabisa?
3.Kwa nini kuna kitu badala ya kutokuwa na kitu?
4. Kusudi la maisha ni nini?
Nini hutokea baada ya kifo?

Sayansi hueleza mfumo Lakini haiwezi kueleza maana.

Inaweza kukuambia mvua inavyonyesha - Lakini si nani anayeiteremsha kwa rehema.

Inaweza kueleza jinsi mtoto anavyoumbwa —Lakini si kwa nini uhai unaanza tumboni.

Inaweza kueleza mapigo ya moyo — Lakini si kwa nini moyo uliumbwa.

Einstein — ambaye hakuwa mtu wa dini — aliwahi kusema:

Sayansi bila dini ni kilema. Hata mwanafizikia asiyeamini Mungu, Paul Davies, alikiri:
Sayansi haiwezi kueleza kwa nini sheria za fizikia zipo... wala kwa nini zimepangwa kwa ukamilifu ili kuhimili uhai.”

Hapo ndipo uabudu wa sayansi (scientism) theist — imani kuwa sayansi pekee inaweza kueleza ukweli wote — unashindwa kabisa.

Kwa sababu:

Sayansi haiwezi kukuambia lipi sahihi au lisilo sahihi.

Sayansi haiwezi kuthibitisha upendo, uzuri, au haki.

Sayansi haiwezi kueleza kwa nini unalia kwa kifo — ingawa ubongo wako “unajua” ni atomi tu.

Sayansi haiwezi kusema kwa nini unajali ukweli hata kidogo.

Lakini Uislamu unaweza Uislamu unakupa vyote:

— Akili ya kuchunguza uumbaji
— Na roho ya kuunganika na Muumbaji
"Hakika katika uumbaji wa mbingu na ardhi… kuna ishara kwa watu wenye akili.”
— [Qur’an 3:190]

“Sema: Mnaona mnaowaabudu badala ya Allah? Nionyesheni walichoumba katika ardhi.”
— [Qur’an 46:4]

Uislamu hauifanyi sayansi kuwa Mungu.

Kwa sababu darubini haiwezi kuchukua nafasi ya ujumbe,
Wala hadubini haiwezi kuchukua nafasi ya ukweli.

Kwa hiyo — sayansi haijachukua nafasi ya Mungu.
Inachofanya ni kufafunua ishara za nguvu Zake.

Kwa ufupi Uislamu ni zaidi ya sayansi wanakupa vyote wakati sayanasi inakupa process sio asili na sababu.
Nb.

Soma upate maarifa sio lazima ucomment au uliza tu suali kuendana na mada hiyo.

Kila dini ni zaidi ya sayansi maana inahitaji imani zaidi ndugu.

 

[Covax]

Kila dini ni zaidi ya sayansi maana inahitaji imani zaidi ndugu.

Na hiyo Dini kweli inasayansi wsakati kitabo chake kina jikanyanga

 

[One day one time]

Na hiyo Dini kweli inasayansi wsakati kitabo chake kina jikanyanga View attachment 3322764

Every single verse in the Bible has its interpretation buddy.

 

[One day one time]

Na hiyo Dini kweli inasayansi wsakati kitabo chake kina jikanyanga View attachment 3322764

Every single verse in the Bible has its interpretation buddy. Re

Every single verse in the Bible has its interpretation buddy

Nkuulize swali kwa nini kuna madhehebu katika uislamu pia

 

[One day one time]

Na hiyo Dini kweli inasayansi wsakati kitabo chake kina jikanyanga View attachment 3322764

Hanafi, Maliki, Hanbali na Shafii wanaitafsiri Quran sawa

### 1. Hanafi School

• Founder: Imam Abu Hanifa (699–767 CE)
• Characteristics:

- Known for its flexibility and reliance on reason (ra'y) and opinion.
- Emphasizes personal judgment (ijtihad) in the absence of clear texts.
- Widely practiced in South Asia, Turkey, and parts of the Middle East.

### 2. Maliki School

• Founder: Imam Malik ibn Anas (711–795 CE)
• Characteristics:

- Bases rulings on the practices of the people of Medina, considering it a model for Islamic behavior.
- Less reliant on personal opinion compared to Hanafi.
- Predominantly found in North and West Africa.

### 3. Shafi'i School

• Founder: Imam Muhammad ibn Idris al-Shafi'i (767–820 CE)
• Characteristics:

- Systematized the principles of jurisprudence, emphasizing the Quran and Hadith as primary sources.
- Developed a structured methodology for deriving legal rulings.
- Commonly followed in East Africa, Southeast Asia, and parts of the Arabian Peninsula.

### 4. Hanbali School

• Founder: Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal (780–855 CE)
• Characteristics:

- Very conservative and literal in its interpretation of texts.
- Places a strong emphasis on the Quran and Hadith, often rejecting analogical reasoning (qiyas) and personal opinion.
- Predominantly practiced in Saudi Arabia and some parts of the Gulf region.

### Key Differences Among the Schools

• Sources of Law: While all schools recognize the Quran and Hadith, their acceptance of other sources (like consensus and analogy) varies.
• Interpretation: The method of interpreting texts can differ, leading to varied rulings on specific issues.
• Cultural Influence: Local customs and practices can shape how each school applies Islamic law in different regions.

 

[One day one time]

Mfano
One notable example of a verse that has differing interpretations among the Sunni legal schools is Surah Al-Baqarah (2:219):

"They ask you about wine and gambling. Say, 'In them is great sin and [yet, some] benefit for people. But their sin is greater than their benefit.'"

### Different Interpretations

1. Hanafi School:
- Interpretation: While acknowledging the harms of alcohol and gambling, the Hanafi school may permit certain forms of trade related to these activities under specific conditions, focusing on the nuances of benefit and harm.

2. Maliki School:
- Interpretation: The Maliki school generally takes a stricter stance against alcohol and gambling, emphasizing the importance of community norms and the consensus of the people of Medina, which viewed these activities as harmful.

3. Shafi'i School:
- Interpretation: The Shafi'i school strictly prohibits both alcohol and gambling, interpreting the verse as a clear condemnation of their consumption and practice, prioritizing the explicit warnings in the Quran.

4. Hanbali School:
- Interpretation: Similar to the Shafi'i school, the Hanbali school strictly forbids alcohol and gambling, viewing the verse as a definitive indication of their sinful nature.

### Conclusion
This verse illustrates how different schools can draw varying conclusions based on their methodologies and underlying principles, leading to a spectrum of legal opinions regarding issues of morality and social behavior.

 

[Wong Fei]

Mkuu uko nje ya mada jikite kwenye mada Uiaslamu ni zaidi ya sayanasi je unakubali au unakata towa hoja zako na evidence kama weni atheist.

Uislamu ungekuwa sayansi, nchi za kiislamu zingekuwa zinatengeneza bidhaa duniani kuliko nchi zingine lakini mpaka leo hii hakuna nchi ya kiislamu yenye uwezo wa kutengeneza simu, TV, Computer, ndege, umeme, hadi magari.
Teknolojia wanazotumia kuchimba mafuta, zimetengenezwa na watu ambao wao wanawaita makafiri.
Uislamu ni sawa na somo la historia, acha kudanganya watu maana hata huyo mtume wenu alikuwa hajui kusoma na kuandika
Sayansi inahitaji watu wenye akili na wenye uelewa. Kama mtu hajafunika kichwa unamuua au hapo Zanzibar ukila hadharani kipindi cha ramadhani, watu wanabeba mafimbo na marungu wakuue. Acheni kufananisha Sayansi na imani (uislamu)

 

[Covax]

Hanafi, Maliki, Hanbali na Shafii wanaitafsiri Quran sawa

### 1. Hanafi School

• Founder: Imam Abu Hanifa (699–767 CE)
• Characteristics:

• Known for its flexibility and reliance on reason (ra'y) and opinion.
• Emphasizes personal judgment (ijtihad) in the absence of clear texts.
• Widely practiced in South Asia, Turkey, and parts of the Middle East.

### 2. Maliki School

• Founder: Imam Malik ibn Anas (711–795 CE)
• Characteristics:

• Bases rulings on the practices of the people of Medina, considering it a model for Islamic behavior.
• Less reliant on personal opinion compared to Hanafi.
• Predominantly found in North and West Africa.

### 3. Shafi'i School

• Founder: Imam Muhammad ibn Idris al-Shafi'i (767–820 CE)
• Characteristics:

• Systematized the principles of jurisprudence, emphasizing the Quran and Hadith as primary sources.
• Developed a structured methodology for deriving legal rulings.
• Commonly followed in East Africa, Southeast Asia, and parts of the Arabian Peninsula.

### 4. Hanbali School

• Founder: Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal (780–855 CE)
• Characteristics:

• Very conservative and literal in its interpretation of texts.
• Places a strong emphasis on the Quran and Hadith, often rejecting analogical reasoning (qiyas) and personal opinion.
• Predominantly practiced in Saudi Arabia and some parts of the Gulf region.

### Key Differences Among the Schools

• Sources of Law: While all schools recognize the Quran and Hadith, their acceptance of other sources (like consensus and analogy) varies.
• Interpretation: The method of interpreting texts can differ, leading to varied rulings on specific issues.
• Cultural Influence: Local customs and practices can shape how each school applies Islamic law in different regions.

Mkuu mbona unahamisha goal post umeanza kutunga mada mpya hao wakina Abu--hanifa wana uhusiana nini na hi Mada? Kwani hao ni manabii au Khalifa, hao ni watu waislamu wa kawaida hata majina yao kwenye Qur"an hamo au hadithi, usipoteze mda nao rudi kwenye mada aliopo juu, ila una uhuru wakukimbia kama wrnzako walivo ishia.

 

[Covax]

Uislamu ungekuwa sayansi, nchi za kiislamu zingekuwa zinatengeneza bidhaa duniani kuliko nchi zingine lakini mpaka leo hii hakuna nchi ya kiislamu yenye uwezo wa kutengeneza simu, TV, Computer, ndege, umeme, hadi magari.
Teknolojia wanazotumia kuchimba mafuta, zimetengenezwa na watu ambao wao wanawaita makafiri.
Uislamu ni sawa na somo la historia, acha kudanganya watu maana hata huyo mtume wenu alikuwa hajui kusoma na kuandika
Sayansi inahitaji watu wenye akili na wenye uelewa. Kama mtu hajafunika kichwa unamuua au hapo Zanzibar ukila hadharani kipindi cha ramadhani, watu wanabeba mafimbo na marungu wakuue. Acheni kufananisha Sayansi na imani (uislamu)

We unajua sayansi ni kutengeneza bidhaa tu very parochial mind loh!!!! Hi nchi ina vilaza wengi kweli kweli.

 

[One day one time]

Mkuu mbona unahamisha goal post umeanza kutunga mada mpya hao wakina Abu--hanifa wana uhusiana nini na hi Mada? Kwani hao ni manabii au Khalifa, hao ni watu waislamu wa kawaida hata majina yao kwenye Qur"an hamo au hadithi, usipoteze mda nao rudi kwenye mada aliopo juu, ila una uhuru wakukimbia kama wrnzako walivo ishia.

Hakuna kilichoama kaka ni katika kuonesha kila verse ina interpretation katika Bible nkakuwekea n mfano kam ilivyo ktk Islam hat interpretation zinatofautiana pia so ni faith tu na kuangalia wapi watokea