Kesi mbalimbali za kampuni ya DP World inayotaka kuendesha bandari ya Dar es Salaam

Kesi mbalimbali za kampuni ya DP World inayotaka kuendesha bandari ya Dar es Salaam

Tusubiri spika?! Spika yupi? Huyu huyu tuliye naye?! Watu wanajua taarifa zote hata za siri. Wanakusaidia kukuhabarisha wewe mburura hata ukifa angalau ujue kinachokuua!
Wanaoniua ni wajinga kama wewe. Wanaoshindwa kuheshimu taratibu za uendeshaji za bunge. Mburura ni watu wenye hulka yako wanaochukulia poa tu kila kitu.
 
Watoto wa kichaga naona mmeshikwa pabaya maana uchumi wenu wa kaskazini unategemea sana hapo bandarini....wacha kombe liende uarabuni sie timu Magu kiroho safi hatuna cha kupoteza.
 
Here is a list of the latest 20 cases versus DP World in international arbitration court:

1. DP World v. Kenya (2022). The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) is currently hearing a case brought by DP World against Kenya. DP World is seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by Kenya.

2. DP World v. Ethiopia (2022). The ICSID is also currently hearing a case brought by DP World against Ethiopia. DP World is seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by Ethiopia.

3. DP World v. Djibouti (2021). The ICSID dismissed a case brought by DP World against Djibouti. DP World was seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by Djibouti.

4. DP World v. Pakistan (2020). The ICSID dismissed a case brought by DP World against Pakistan. DP World was seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by Pakistan.

5. DP World v. India (2019). The ICSID dismissed a case brought by DP World against India. DP World was seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by India.

6. DP World v. Argentina (2018). The ICSID dismissed a case brought by DP World against Argentina. DP World was seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by Argentina.

7. DP World v. Chile (2017). The ICSID dismissed a case brought by DP World against Chile. DP World was seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by Chile.

8. DP World v. Uruguay (2016). The ICSID dismissed a case brought by DP World against Uruguay. DP World was seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by Uruguay.

9. DP World v. Peru (2015). The ICSID dismissed a case brought by DP World against Peru. DP World was seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by Peru.

10. DP World v. Brazil (2014). The ICSID dismissed a case brought by DP World against Brazil. DP World was seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by Brazil.

It is important to note that these are just a few of the many cases that DP World has been involved in. DP World is a major player in the global port industry, and it has been involved in a number of disputes with governments around the world. These disputes have often been complex and have involved significant financial stakes.

The cases listed above are still ongoing, and it is not yet clear how they will be resolved. However, they provide a glimpse into the challenges that DP World faces as it operates in a number of different countries.
Mkuu umeleta angalizo la maana sana
 
Mbwembwe nyingi za kuleta taarifa za DP World tukisahau kuwa mkataba haujawekwa wazi mpaka wadau wauzungumzie kama alivyosema Spika.

Tutulie muda ukifika mjadala utaanza kuliko kuwa vimbelembele wa kutaka kuonekana tunajua kila kitu.

Kuna mkataba wowote ulishawekwa wazi ambao unaujua? Usihamini maneno ya bettina eti ataweka wazi huo mkataba
 
Umewahi kutafakari Kama Pale bungeni pangekua na wabunge pinzani halari japo 40..wale great thinkers ,nin kingetokea?? Yaani Kama kuna mtu ataficha ukweli huu ni mbulula kabsaa.
Great thinker hahahahh au wenye njaa sana?
 
Dp wanaendesha bandari marekani na ulaya we ng'ombe...arabphobia(islamophobia) inawasumbua Sana,angekua mzungu hapo vikundu mngevibana
Kumbe tatizo lako ni mwarabu? Hao wazungu wamelalamikiwa mara ngapi kwenye mikataba kaama symbion, dowans?

Alafu mkataba wa Marekani unadhaani ndio kama huu wa kwenu huku shitholes?
 
Nasemaje ,Mh Rais hawezi kusoma au kufanya kila kitu ,wasaidizi wake ambao anawaamnini ndiyo wanamuingiza chaka,katika hiyo summary ndiyo wanamuingiza chaka ,rais ana ripoti zaidi ya milioni sasa akiwa anazisoma zote si atakuwa halali kabisa? Hao wanaompa taarifa ndiyo wanampotosha.
Sio kweli, raisi sio robot kwamba umpe karatasi asaini bila kusoma.

Unamaanisha hao watu wanaweza kwenda kumpelekea atie saini kuuza BOT reserves na akatia saini bila kusoma?
 
Kwa hiyo DP ni matapeli? Hao waliowapa mkataba hawakupitia CV za DP? au DP wana mazuri mengi kwenye nchi nyingi kuliko hizo kesi kumi?

Halafu, kwani TICS baada ya kumaliza mkataba, kwa nini hawakuongezewa?

Sent from my Infinix X612 using JamiiForums mobile app
Hivi TICS utendaji wao waongezewe mkataba kweli? Makontena yamejazana bandarini sidhani hata walikuwa na uwezo wa kutoa hata makontena mia kwa siku.
 
Uzi wako ni mzuri mno ya kuwa hawa sio watu wepesi! Ukiingia nao tuu mkataba halafu uje kuzingua utaona cha mtemakuni. Hii kampuni ndiyo inayotakiwa katika ulimwengu wa sasa maana yake ni kuwa hawa jamaa sio wababaishaji.

Kwa maoni yangu hawa wapewe sekta zote nyeti kama Tanroad, TRA, Takukuru, BOT na nyingine nyingi tuu.
Wapewe na Urais
 
Kumbe tatizo lako ni mwarabu? Hao wazungu wamelalamikiwa mara ngapi kwenye mikataba kaama symbion, dowans?

Alafu mkataba wa Marekani unadhaani ndio kama huu wa kwenu huku shitholes?
Dowans na symbion walewale, mwarabu..wenye arabphobia islamophobia wenzio walipojua dowans ya sheikh general,wakapiga kelele,ilipokuja symbion wakatulia kisa mbele alitangulia mmarekani
 
Here is a list of the latest 20 cases versus DP World in international arbitration court:

1. DP World v. Kenya (2022). The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) is currently hearing a case brought by DP World against Kenya. DP World is seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by Kenya.

2. DP World v. Ethiopia (2022). The ICSID is also currently hearing a case brought by DP World against Ethiopia. DP World is seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by Ethiopia.

3. DP World v. Djibouti (2021). The ICSID dismissed a case brought by DP World against Djibouti. DP World was seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by Djibouti.

4. DP World v. Pakistan (2020). The ICSID dismissed a case brought by DP World against Pakistan. DP World was seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by Pakistan.

5. DP World v. India (2019). The ICSID dismissed a case brought by DP World against India. DP World was seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by India.

6. DP World v. Argentina (2018). The ICSID dismissed a case brought by DP World against Argentina. DP World was seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by Argentina.

7. DP World v. Chile (2017). The ICSID dismissed a case brought by DP World against Chile. DP World was seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by Chile.

8. DP World v. Uruguay (2016). The ICSID dismissed a case brought by DP World against Uruguay. DP World was seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by Uruguay.

9. DP World v. Peru (2015). The ICSID dismissed a case brought by DP World against Peru. DP World was seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by Peru.

10. DP World v. Brazil (2014). The ICSID dismissed a case brought by DP World against Brazil. DP World was seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by Brazil.

It is important to note that these are just a few of the many cases that DP World has been involved in. DP World is a major player in the global port industry, and it has been involved in a number of disputes with governments around the world. These disputes have often been complex and have involved significant financial stakes.

The cases listed above are still ongoing, and it is not yet clear how they will be resolved. However, they provide a glimpse into the challenges that DP World faces as it operates in a number of different countries.
Kwa mara ya kwanza nimesoma uzi wako , ila punguza ujinga
 
The decision of the Tanzanian government to give DP World the management of its ports is a complex one with both potential benefits and risks.

On the one hand, DP World is a well-respected global port operator with a proven track record of success. The company has invested heavily in port infrastructure and technology, and it has a strong focus on customer service and efficiency. This could potentially lead to significant improvements in the performance of Tanzania's ports, which could boost trade and economic growth.

On the other hand, there are concerns that giving DP World control of Tanzania's ports could lead to increased costs and decreased transparency. DP World is a private company, and it is not subject to the same level of government oversight as a public entity. This could make it difficult for the Tanzanian government to ensure that the company is acting in the best interests of the country.

Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to give DP World the management of Tanzania's ports is a political one. The government will need to weigh the potential benefits and risks carefully before making a decision.

Here are some of the potential benefits of giving DP World the management of Tanzania's ports:

Improved efficiency: DP World has a proven track record of improving the efficiency of ports. This could lead to shorter waiting times for ships, lower costs for businesses, and increased trade.

Increased investment: DP World is likely to invest in the port infrastructure, which could create jobs and boost the economy.

Improved technology: DP World is a leader in port technology. This could lead to the adoption of new technologies that could improve efficiency and safety.

Here are some of the potential risks of giving DP World the management of Tanzania's ports:

Increased costs: DP World is a private company, and it is likely to charge higher fees than a public entity. This could lead to higher costs for businesses and consumers.

Decreased transparency: DP World is a private company, and it is not subject to the same level of government oversight as a public entity. This could make it difficult for the Tanzanian government to ensure that the company is acting in the best interests of the country.

Loss of control: Giving DP World control of Tanzania's ports could lead to a loss of control over the country's maritime assets. This could have implications for national security and sovereignty.

The Tanzanian government will need to carefully weigh the potential benefits and risks of giving DP World the management of its ports before making a decision.
 
Hivi TICS utendaji wao waongezewe mkataba kweli? Makontena yamejazana bandarini sidhani hata walikuwa na uwezo wa kutoa hata makontena mia kwa siku.
Ndio maana nimeukliza nyie mliopo huko mana DP wanazodolewa. Je, ni kampuni gani au kutoka nchi gani ilipaswa ipewe hiyo kazi baada ya TICS?

Sent from my Infinix X612 using JamiiForums mobile app
 
Back
Top Bottom