Kweli binadamu ana 'roho'? Iko sehemu gani hasa mwilini?

Kweli binadamu ana 'roho'? Iko sehemu gani hasa mwilini?

Lakn mimi huyu jamaa huwanga simuelewi kabisa ambacho huwanga anaongelea.

unakutana na mtu kama mimi nilieishia darasa la saba lakn anaendelea kuni-quote macoping yake yakizungu. kwa nini asiwe anatumia lugha inayoeleweka kwa wengi kama anavyofanyaga kiranga. akikutana na mtu aliyemu-quote kwa kingereza anamjibu kwa kingereza wa kiswahili anajibu kwa kiswahili.
It seems you are scared of Latin young man. Nevertheless, as a chemical that has no morals you shouldn't be worrying of the Spirit, since chemicals has no morals or life, to wit,

I will keep on clubbing you until you respond intellectually to my posts and stop been mindless just like those followers of a cult of No God.
 
Ni kweli, ila kuonyesha source ni muhimu zaidi.
The source of the source of your own source is sourcing the source which means nothing. Is like refusing to answer me why is nothing exists rather than something while nothing is something and existing as nothing and not like something.

You can not comprehend this.
 
It seems you are scared of Latin young man. Nevertheless, as a chemical that has no morals you shouldn't be worrying of the Spirit, since chemicals has no morals or life, to wit,

I will keep on clubbing you until you respond intellectually to my posts and stop been mindless just like those followers of a cult of No God.

Fanani amefeli kuwakilisha ujumbe kwa hadhira wake??,
 
Msolo tatizo la ku-copy na ku-paste halina tatizo kabisa lakini Inasababisha kudharaulika pale unapogundulika umefanya hivyo na hujataja source.
You are spanked with evidence and you can not handle your inferior non theisticaco way of thinking while trying to intellectually help yourself from a defeat from a theist who is informed.

If you are a chemical animal and have no morals and wills, what makes you think chemical animals have Spirit? You shouldn't be wasting your time whining while you are just guilt of a diabolical non theistic unproven oafish theorems. Unless, you are in the middle of a chemicalussion which doesn't exist to theistic thinkers.

That is why non theists are mindless
 
So there is no answer meaning by our current knowledge? Not that the question is unknowabke?

What if we acquire ways to find a rational and definitive answer to this question?

How do you know what we can know if we are limited in knowledge to begin with?

I am convinced that in reality constitute two things: phenomena and noumena. phenomena is the appeareance of things to us and noumena is the thing in itself. But human beings know things through appearance.Then if that is convincing,how would someone know either the soul exist or not. We don't have the appearance or impression of the soul.

You are saying that "What if we acquire ways to find a rational and definitive answer to this question?" I think your argument is begging the question because you have not said in what means shall we arrived at that knowledge. In short your claim is based on presumption.
 
Fanani amefeli kuwakilisha ujumbe kwa hadhira wake??,
I don't know what you mean, but refusing to answer me why is nothing exists rather than something while nothing is something and existing as nothing and not like something.

If humans are chemical animals and have no morals and wills, what makes non theists think chemical animals have Spirit? Non theists and God Haters shouldn't be wasting their time whining while they are just guilt of a diabolical non theistic unproven oafish theorems. Unless, they are in the middle of a chemicalussion which doesn't exist to theistic thinkers.

Wherefore, as a chemical that has no morals you shouldn't be worrying of the Spirit, since chemicals has no morals or life, to wit,
 
hahahahah kumbe jamaa nikajua anajua kizungu cha ukweli, kumbe anapesti kila kitu!

Huyu jamaa sijui ni mkristu wa aina gan?? ana matusi mabaya sana. hata Moderator hawashuliki sijui kwa nini,
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't know what you mean, but refusing to answer me why is nothing exists rather than something while nothing is something and existing as nothing and not like something.

If humans are chemical animals and have no morals and wills, what makes non theists think chemical animals have Spirit? Non theists and God Haters shouldn't be wasting their time whining while they are just guilt of a diabolical non theistic unproven oafish theorems. Unless, they are in the middle of a chemicalussion which doesn't exist to theistic thinkers.

Wherefore, as a chemical that has no morals you shouldn't be worrying of the Spirit, since chemicals has no morals or life, to wit,

Ulitombana, nyanoko tomboloko.
 
Huyu jamaa sijui ni mkristu wa aina gan?? ana matusi mabaya sana. hata Moderator hawashuliki sijui kwa nini,
Scientifically, "MATUSI" doesn't exists since you are a chemical animal. There is no moral in you, just a consolidation of chemicals that makes you exists.
 
Ni swali zuri lakini kabla hawajukuja wakina Kiranga UHURU JR Ishmael kukupa ufafanuzi zaidi.

mimi nigependa kukuliza swali, unajua upepo? kama ndio uniambie
uko wapi?? je,? upepo huwanga unakufa kama ndio au hapana ni kwa nini?
Ukijibu hayo maswali nitapata pakuanzia

Petro E. Mselewa ukijibu hayo, pia ujiulize....Kabla ya mwanadamu hajaipata hiyo pumzi alikuwa katika hali gani? Upepo hutoka wapi na kuishia wapi? AU... Upepo huanzia wapi na nani anauanzisha?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The source of the source of your own source is sourcing the source which means nothing. Is like refusing to answer me why is nothing exists rather than something while nothing is something and existing as nothing and not like something.

You can not comprehend this.

Wewe ji-complicate to, lakini mwisho wa yote kinachokupa kiburi ni hiyo pumzi na siku ikikatika tunakufukia huna thamani tena hapa duniani. What is the source of pumzi?
 
I am convinced that in reality constitute two things: phenomena and noumena. phenomena is the appeareance of things to us and noumena is the thing in itself. But human beings know things through appearance.Then if that is convincing,how would someone know either the soul exist or not. We don't have the appearance or impression of the soul.
You are saying that "What if we acquire ways to find a rational and definitive answer to this question?" I think your argument is begging the question because you have not said in what means shall we arrived at that knowledge. In short your claim is based on presumption.

What you are essentially saying is "nothing is knowable".

That itself begs the question.

If nothing is knowable, how would you know that nothing is knowable?

Isn't the conclusion itself that "nothing is knowable" self contradictory?
 
mawazo ni nini ?

Biological transmissions of information by excitements in neuron's electrochemical signaling resulting in intellectually cognitive exertions.
 
I expected this. It is fun to spank oafish God Haters. If you are still frustrated, you may consider to join winners club.

What's the winners club Ishmael? Do u mean the Society With Secrets?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

You have no evidence nor proof for no God, no spirit, yet you believe in No God and no spirit.

Nothing worse than a self-assured bonehead celebrating stupidity as something profound.
Huu ndio ufafanuzi wako, katika swali kwamba roho ni nini, inakaa wapi na kazi yake ni nini?
I am happy to put you into my ignore list!!
 
What's the winners club Ishmael? Do u mean the Society With Secrets?
Ha ha ha, it is not Sir. It is a club of people who are informed of existence of visible and invisible and that the invisible makes the visible.
 
Back
Top Bottom