Machache yanayonifanya niamini uwepo wa Mungu: Hatari ya kuamini hakuna Mungu

[Beesmom]

Mungu yupo sema tu kushupaza shingo

 

[Ahmed Saidi]

Mungu yupo sema tu kushupaza shingo

Kabisa ndugu,

 

[Mtuache]

Kama kila kitu sio lazima kiwe na chanzo basi hata ulimwengu hauna chanzo

Kama unakubali akili zetu haziwezi kufikiria kwa usahihi kwasababu ziko limited, utajuaje kuwa hata hilo wazo la kusema muumbaji wa ulimwengu ni Mungu sio muendelezo ule ule wa kufikiria majibu yasio sahihi?

Kabla ya kusema kumuamini Mungu hapo unakuwa umeruka vipengele baadhi ambavyo havijaonesha namna gani umefika hapo

Umejuaje kuna Mungu ambaye anapaswa kuaminiwa?

Ni akili ipi uliyoitumia kujua hilo?

Katika maswali yako uliyojiuliza kuhusu hatma ya ulimwengu nakujibu kwa kukupa maswali zaidi

Hapa nachukua upande wa dini ambao najua wengi ndio mnasimamia

Dini zimesema hapo mwanzo Mungu aliumba mbingu na ardhi

Kumbuka huo ni mwanzo, unaweza kujiuliza kabla ya mwanzo kulikuwaje?

Kama mwanzo umeanza na Mungu kuumba mbingu na ardhi, je huo sio mwanzo wa uwepo wa Mungu pia?

Kama Mungu alikuwepo kabla basi huo sio mwanzo

Lakini utajiuliza tena alikuwa akiishi wapi maana mbingu na ardhi kaviumba leo ambayo ndio mwanzo, na yeye wansema ni wamilele. Alikuwa akiishi wapi?

Haya huko pia alipokuwa akiishi kuliumbwa na nani?

Na kama kulikuwa kuna sehemu anaishi bado tu hii ya ulimwengu na ardhi itaendelea kuhesabika kama mwanzo?

Au tuseme ni mwanzo wa uumbaji na tukubaliane kwamba hakukuwa na uimbaji mwingine uliotangulia kabla ya huo?

Hapo kuna maswali mengi magumu naomba tupaache tuelekee section ya pili na huwezi kukuta pastor ana hubiri hoja tata kama hizo

Haya tujiulize mazingira ya uumbaji yalivyofanyika

Mfano leo hii ukitaka kuchimba shimo lazima utaanzia juu ya ardhi, nikiwa na maana kwamba utasimama ukiwa hapo na likikamilika utaweza kuingia ndani

Leo hii ukimkuta mtu yupo shimoni baada ya kuchimba shimo itakuwa ni rahisi kufikiria kuwa kabla ya kuingia shimoni kulikuwa na ardhi ambayo iko level ambapo hapo ndio alisimama akachimba mpaka kutengeneza shimo

Sasa Mungu aliumba ulimwengu akiwa wapi?

Huwezi kufikiria aliumba ulimwengu akiwa ndani ya ulimwengu kwasababu itaonekana hapo anaufanyia repair kwa maana ya kwamba ulikwisha jengwa

Kwahiyo wewe unakiri MUNGU HAYUPO, sindio?

 

[Smart911]

Ahsante kwa elimu...

 

[Ahmed Saidi]

Key Tactics of the Naturalist Atheists
There are a number of high-level operational tactics employed by atheist evolutionists. We will mention three main ones here:

First: The deliberate, calculated separation between:

a) the origin of life, termed abiogenesis.
This refers to the process of biological life arising from non-living matter which violates the law of biogenesis, [life only ever arises from life], which has never been proven false to date*, and
*No scientific refutation of the law of biogenesis has been embarked upon to date.
If there have been attempts of which we are unaware, they have failed.
Many objections have been made by evolutionists and atheists about asserting that life only coming from life being a law, but they are of zero empirical value.

b) the process of evolution after biological life has appeared.

Atheists treat them as two different non-related fields pretending as if the scientific status of the first has no impact upon the scientific status of the second.

This is because evolutionary theory rests upon the unproven assumption that encoded information, then biological life arose from inert inorganic molecules through purely physico-chemical processes.

Put another way, they require a #miracle upon which their naturalist storytelling can be embarked upon.

Without this miracle - the appearance of encoded information followed by a self-replicating cell - the wagon does not move and remains stuck in the warm muddy pond.

Hence, their response: “Abiogenesis isn’t part of the theory of evolution anyway.”

The two fields are inseparable and the scientific status of the first affects the scientific status of the second because the first is an unproven assumption of the second.

The first self-replicating cell must have as much digital, communications, engineering and data storage sophistication as cells today in order for all future alleged “mutation” and “selection” evolutionary processes to take place leading to the gradual increase
of prescriptive information and biological complexity and diversity.

Using mutation and natural selection to account for the arrival of the first self-replicating cell is not possible because these processes cannot kick in unless there is something to “mutate” and “select” for which is the first self-replication cell.

Hence, sagacious believers require a tremendous amount of faith in a miracle of astounding proportions which violates physico-chemistry and natural law.

Francis Crick, the atheist and molecular biologist who codiscovered the structure of DNA wrote in a 1981 book:
“An honest man, armed with all the knowledge available to us now, could only state that in some sense, the origin of life appears at the moment to be almost a miracle, so many are the conditions which would have had to have been satisfied to get it going.”
Life Itself: Its Origin and Nature. New York: Simon & Schuster. 1981. p. 88.

The question would also arise as to whether life originated more than once.

Since we are dealing with the micro-level scale, then relatively large areas (such as warm ponds, oceans and large rock surfaces) must have experienced the same circumstances and made multiple origins of biological life possible.

This is a question that plagues evolutionists and atheists and it is amusing to see how they address this matter.

We find articles in the New Scientist magazine: “Life may have emerged not once, but many times on Earth” with the subtitle:
“Far from being a miracle that happened just once in 4 billion years, life’s beginnings could have been so commonplace that it began many times over”
Source: https://www.newscientist .com, 17 August, 2016

Years earlier, another article, “Why complex life probably evolved only once”.52
Source: https://www.newscientist .com, 21 October, 2010.

They also speculate that there may have been as much as ten different separate origins of life - each of which would have its own peculiar system - but only one survived.

One can refer to the paper “Multiple origins of life”* by way of example wherein the authors present this conjecture on the basis of mathematical models
- the same scam used in modern cosmology wherein the existence of imaginary forces, particles and fields which just happen to patch and save their empirically
and observationally falsified cosmological models is made possible through mathematical models and equations.
*Source: Raup, D.M. & Valentine, J.W. Multiple origins of life. Proc. Natt Acad. Sci.Vol. 80; pp. 2981-2984, May 1983.

They literally write imaginary entities into existence.

In accordance with the principle of proof being commensurate with the claim, in order to argue for their religion

• upon the strict standards of the scientific method-then observable, repeatable and testable empirical evidence must be shown in which random events, physico-chemistry or the laws of nature
• lacking choice with intent
• are able to produce a self-replicating cell, complete with its information, communications and engineering architecture.

The proof must be commensurate with the claim.

Merely showing thatmamino-acids or small peptides can be produced within controlled laboratory conditions and then extrapolating from the results is not allowed because the proof is not commensurate with the claim and does not meet scientific standards.

Conjectures about metabolismfirst, RNA-first, lipid-first scenarios do not amount to empirical evidence, as they are mere conjectures and storytelling exercises.

Sagacious evolutionary clergymen are masters of extrapolation.

To extrapolate means: To project beyond the range of known values on the basis of values already determined; to infer a possibility beyond the strict evidence of a series of facts, events, observations, and so on.

Evidences for abiogenesis and neo-Darwinian evolution employ extrapolation and do not meet the standards of empirical science which include observation, testability and repeatability.

When pressed for satisfactory answers in this topic of the origin of life and knowing that humanity does not possess the knowledge, ingenuity and skill to general life,
Atheists like Richard Dawkins are forced to seek refuge in the possibility that advanced intelligent aliens seeded life on Earth, but then beg the question by claiming that these aliens must themselves have come about through some type of Darwinian evolution, thus only pushing the problem one step back and not answering the question in substance at all.

A Muslims guide to Naturalism, Evolution and Atheism, by Abu Iyaad Amjad Rafeeq (May Allah preserve him) www.AboutAtheism.Net @Abuiyaad

====================
The knowledge of the existence of someone, something or some entity does not have to based upon sense-perception alone.

What are “evidence” and “knowledge” and what are the routes through which they can be attained?

As Muslims we believe the routes are many and they include:
-fitrah (innate disposition),
-mushāhadah (observation or witness),
-ḥiss (sensory perception),
-ʿaql ṣarīḥ (sound reason),
-tajribah (experience or experimentation) and
-riwāyah (transmisssion) and others.

 

[Ahmed Saidi]

Atheists:
call religious people backward

Also atheists:
believe in the outdated Darwinian evolution from the 1800s

The theory was penned before DNA was discovered, or the complexity of biological cells were even understood.

 

[Matawi ya juu]

Nilipongeze shirika la Anga la Russia kwa kufungua njia hao wengineo ni kama harusi hawakosekaniki wasindikizaji.
Katika tafiti zao wanafika mahala wanaamini yupo mwenye vyake.
China juzi kati kaotesha mimea huko angani kaja ipanda duniani tujiulize kwa nini aioteshee huko?

Kuna mahala nilisoma mti uloteremshwa na malaika wengi 99 ni mwarobaini.

Wewe inabidi ueleweshwe, China kuotesha mmea angani sio issue ni kitu common sana ,science experiments nyingi zinakuwa na matokeo ya haraka na uhakika zikifanyika sehemu yenye gravity ndogo ndio maana wenzetu wana space station ambako kazi yake kubwa ni kufanya hizo experiments, space station ina cost billions of dollars kila mwaka unafikiri yale ni mapambo? vitu vingi sana kwenye agriculture, medicine, technology etc vimegunduliwa kutokana na hiyo space station

 

[smaki]

Vitisho ni silaha ya mwisho ya mjinga

KM ni hivo basi Ulimwengu woote!! including weye, wana sayansi, Rais wako, waalimu wako nk! ni wajinga kwa sababu wanaogopa siraha za USA/Russia!....km siyo Mujinga jaribu uone moto!!....

Najua unampongeza Shetani haogopi vitisho vya kuchomwa moto!...pia ana watoto humu Duniani wasiyo ogopa kile wanacho amini ni vitisho hilo tunalijua........

Huna tofauti na mtoto anayeenda shule kwa hofu ya viboko.

Tofauti ni kuwa yule mtoto anaye enda shule kwa kuogopa viboko bila kuhoji uhalali wa viboko, ni Mjinga, Muoga, mnafiki wa kesho, hafai, siyo mdadisi, viboko ni siraha ya kukuza udadisi wa mtoto, kitaaluma!.......

mtoto mzuri na mwenye uelewa ni yule atakae tafuta suruhisho la kudumu au kuhoji uhalali wa yeye kupigwa viboko!...kama ulienda shule kwa kuogopa viboko basi hufai kuwa kiongozi bora!!

kwa sababu ulishindwa kufikia muafaka wa kudumu kwa yule aliye kupatia Elimu kwa kukutisha kwa viboko!..japo yeye alikuwa sahihi!.....

Aliye kutishia kwa viboko ili uende shule alikuwa sahihi, sababu alikuwa anakuza uwezo wako wa kufikiri, kujitetea, kutafuta suruhu, usiwe na nidhamu ya uoga,

Bali uwe jasiri, uwe na uwezo wa kuhoji na kufikia muafaka!...ina maana weye hata ulipo umwa ulienda tu sababu ulikuwa mwoga! wa viboko?! sasa hu ni ujinga uliopitiliza!!

Mzazi anaweza kukutuma peku mbaaali sana kijiji cha pili, mchana wa jua kali akijua wazi kabisaa kuwa una njaa, kiu. uchovu, hapa ukienda tu, na ukishindwa kujitetea anajua sina mtoto hapa!

Ndo km hiyo yako, weye ukisikia! km hujaelewa hapa ''obvious you need fire!

 

[smaki]

Umesema akili ya kawaida haiwezi kutambua, vipi kama hata swala lako la kusema Mungu yupo sio majibu potofu ya akili yako?

amaepata nguvu za ziada kutoka kwa roho mtaka tifu

 

[Scars]

amaepata nguvu za ziada kutoka kwa roho mtaka tifu

Hiyo nguvu ameitambuaje na kujua ni roho mtakatifu na sio kama anapitia paranoia tu?

 

[smaki]

Hiyo nguvu ameitambuaje na kujua ni roho mtakatifu na sio kama anapitia paranoia tu?

''Imani si mali ya kila Mtu!'' Paranoia ni jibu rahisi kwa swali tata! utazunguka weee! lkn hutapata jibu rahisi ivo!

 

[Kentsuhcy Wrudate]

Dunia imebadilikia, utandawazi unatukutanisha na watu mbalimbali duniani. Fikra mpya, filosofia na elimu inatujuza mitazamo ya watu mbalimbali katika Historia na hata ulimwengu tulio nao.

Moja kwa moja niende kuelezea kwanini naamini uwepo wa Mungu kwa kutumia hoja za kisayansi zenye kufikirika na hoja za kiroho (kihisia)

HOJA ZA KIULIMWENGU
kwa kuuangalia ulimwengu jinsi ulivyoumbwa basi ni alama tosha ya kuthibisha uwepo wa Mungu.

Sayari, nyota, nebula, Galaksi, mashimo meusi (black holes), miezi, magimba na vyengine vingi.
Nikijaribu kusoma ulimwengu, basi nafsi yangu inaniambia kabisa kuwa Kuna muumba wa vitu vyote hivi. Hivi ni kweli nyota kubwa kubwa Kama Stephenson 2-18, Betelgause, Rigel, Sirius A na nyengine, Nebula kama Carina nebula, Orion nebula, Helix nebula na nyengine nyingi, havina mtengenezaji? Hivi ni kweli vitu vyote hivi vimetokea kwa bahati nasibu?
View attachment 2301621
View attachment 2301612
Ulimwengu ni mkubwa na umeumbwa kwa namna ya kushangaza sana. Mnapo tarehe 11 julai 2022, shirika la utafiti wa anga la Marekani NASA kwa kutumia darubini ya James Webb limeweza kupiga picha za mbali kabisa, wanasayansi wanahuita ukingo wa ulimwengu (edge of the observable universe). Kwakweli picha hizo ni zenye kupendeza sana. Kilichonistaajabisha sana ni kuwa kuna picha imechukuliwa kutoka umbali wa miaka ya mwanga bilioni 4.5 (4.5 billion light years). Umbali huu ni mrefu sana ambao mwanadamu hawezi akapata picha halisi. Lakini kwa tafsiri yenye kueleweka ni kuwa mwanga umesafiri kutoka huko katika ukingo wa ulimwengu hadi hapa duniani kwa miaka bilioni 4.5 iliyopita na hizo galaksi tunazoziona kwenye picha basi tunaziona jinsi nilivyokuwa miaka bilioni 4.5 iliyopita.
View attachment 2301572
View attachment 2301618
Wanasayansi wanathibitisha ya kuwa ulimwengu wenyekuonekana ni sehemu ndogo tu ya ulimwengu mzima, ni nukta tu ya ulimwengu mzima. Wapo wanaothibitisha ya kuwa Kuna ulimwengu zaidi ya mmoja (multiverse). Hivi kwa uumbaji huu ni kweli hakuna mwenye nguvu zisizo za kawaida ambae ndio katengeneza vyote hivyo?

Uwingi wa nyota, galaksi, nebula na vyengine vingi. Uwingi tu wa vitu hivyo unastaajabisha sana. Hizi vyota tumaziona ni nyota chache tu kati ya nyota nyingi katika galaksi yetu yaani milky way. Inakadiliwa kuwa Kuna nyota bilioni 100 hadi 400 katika galaksi yetu yaani milky way. Ni nyota nyingi ambazo kama ungeweza kuziangalia kutoka katika umbali fulani basi ungepata picha halisi. Sasa hii ni galaksi moja na wanasayansi wanakadiria pia kuwa kuna takribani galaksi bilioni 100 hadi 200 katika ulimwengu unaoonekana. Na huu ulimwengu wenyekuonekana ni sehemu tu ya ulimwengu mzima, je Kuna vitu vingapi katika ulimwengu usiooneka?
View attachment 2301578
View attachment 2301583
Mifumo ya kiulimwengu yenye kutulinda wanadamu. Nikiangalia jinsi tabaka la ozoni (ozone layer) inavyotulinda kutokana na mionzi ya UV, mzunguko wa jua na dunia, mwezi na sayari nyengine ambapo Kama vitaenda tofauti basi maisha ya mwanadamu yatakuwa hatarini. Ukitafakari mfumo wa uzungukaji wa maji (water cycle) unaweza ukapata taswira ya kivipi maisha yetu yanategemea huruma ya Mungu. Dunia ingeweza hata kuhama kutoka katika obiti yake. Lakini kuna mlizi wetu ambae halali, anaetupenda.
Kuna magimba makubwa yanayodondoka kila siku, kila saa na dakika, Lakini Mungu kaweka utaratibu wake, magimba hayo huyayuka kabla ya kutufikia binadamu katika uso wa dunia. Ni njia ya Mungu kutulinda binadamu kwani kuna sayari ngapi huangukiwa na magimba hayo.
View attachment 2301584

SABABU ZA KIROHO (KIHISIA)
Kutambua uwepo wa Mungu ni suala la asili ya mwanadamu na viumbe wengine. Tangu tunazaliwa, tunakuwa na utambuzi wa asili juu ya uwepo wa Mungu. Hakuna mtoto ambae haamini uwepo wa Mungu. Ingawa Mungu haonekani lakini mara zote watoto hutaja neno Mungu. Kiasili kila mtu ana schema ya kutambua uwepo wa Mungu lakini mazingira yanaweza yakambadilisha na kuamini kuwa hakuna Mungu.

Mapenzi ya mzazi kwa mtoto, upendo wa mzazi hasa wa mama ni alama ya uwepo wa Mungu. Ukitafakari kwa kina utagundua kuna alieweka mapenzi haya ambae ni Mungu. Na hii si kwa binadamu tu bali hata kwa wanyama pia. Mzazi yuko tayari kuhatarisha uhai wake ili awalinde watoto wake, ona kuku anavyowalinda vifaranga vyake dhidi ya mwewe, nyoka na wanyama wengine. .

Utofauti wa binadamu na wanyama wengine. Hapa najiuliza kwanini binadamu tunavaa nguo, tunasoma elimu mbalimbali, tuna majumba mazuri, teknolojia, usafiri wa anga na kila kitu kizuri, Kila leo binadamu hubadilika na kugundua vitu vipya, mitindo mipya ya mavazi, nyumba na magari hubadilika pia. Maisha ya viumbe wengine yapo hivyo hivyo miaka nenda, miaka rudi. Si ajabu kabisa kuku kumpanda mama yake, kujamiiana kwao huwa ni sehemu yoyote. Binadamu tunahifadhi hadi kinyesi chetu, lakini wanyama hawana utaratibu huo. Ni jambo gumu kwa binadamu kumla binadamu mwenzake lakini leo ukichinja kuku nyumbani kwako basi mabaki ya nyama hiyo unawatupia kuku wengine. Hivi binadamu kuwa na utambuzi, fikra, akili, uwezo kwa kupanga na kuamua umekuja kwa bahati nasibu au ni Mungu ndio kapanga iwe hivyo?

Mifumo ya mwili na jinsi inavyofanya kazi. Hakika binadamu na wanyama wengine wameumbwa katika namna tata sana. Ona Kuna mfumo wa chakula, mfumo wa hewa, mfumo wa utoaji taka mwili, mfumo wa Neva, mfumo wa mzunguko wa damu na mifumo mingine mingi. Mungu amempa Mwanaamu changamoto ya kuumba hata sisimizi na kamwe hataweza.

NI IPI HASARA YA KUTOAMINI MUNGU?
Mbali na hasara kuu ambayo mtu ataipata siku ya malipo kwa kutoamini kwakwe, pia kuna hasara nyingi ambazo zinaitesa dunia ya leo kutokana na upingaji huu.
Kutoamini Mungu kunaondoa utu, mtu ambae haamini Mungu anaweza akaingia katika matendo ambayo hayatamtofautisha yeye na mnyama. Kama tulivyoona awali kuwa mnyama na binadamu ni tofauti basi mtu ambae haamini uwepo wa Mungu anaweza akakaribiana kimatendo na mnyama.
Mambo yafuatayo yamesababishwa kwa kiasi kikubwa na kuto kuwa na imani ya Mungu

i. Filamu za ngono, matamasha ya kutembea utupu na mfano wa hayo.
Dunia leo inashuhudia kilele cha maovu ya mwanadamu. Kuna maelfu kwa malaki ya waigizaji wa filamu za ngono tena kwa namna tofauti.

ii. Kukua kwa matendo ya ushoga, usagaji na kuwekewa kampeni maalumu ili kukuza vitendo hivyo.

iii. Ujambazi, ukatili, mauwaji na maovu mengine. Jamii ambayo watu wake hawaamini Mungu basi ni rahisi sana kuangukia katika dunia yenye migogoro kuuwana na ukatili wa aina zote.

Ili tuijenge jamii yenye ustawi mzuri, maadili mema, ukuaji uchumi na hatimae maendeleo endelevu basi tusimsahau Mungu wetu.
ELIMU, KAZI NA SALA

Hayo manyota makubwa yazinidi kua formed mpaka leo... yani nyota zinazaliwa na kufa. Mfano hili jua letu (likiwa nalo ni nyota) linategemewa kufa baada ya miaka billion tano. Makadirio haya yanafanywa kwa kuangalia nyota nyingine zenye mfanano na jua. Mpaka sasa bado ziko nyota zinazidi kutengenezwa na bado ziko nyota zinazidi kufa.
Universe ni kubwa sana na inazidi kupanuka mpaka leo. Hatuwezi kuona mwisho wa universe kwa teknologia yetu ya sasa kwasababu inapanuka kwa kasi zaidi ya kasi ya mwanga... hivo huwezi kuona mwisho.

 

[Kalunya]

Kiyasansi Mungu hayupo. Lakini kwa elimu zingine zinathibitisha Mungu yupo.
Sayansi haina uwezo wa kujibu KILA kitu, hadi SAsa imejibu asilimia 10 tu ya mambo yaliyopo. 90 ya mambo imeshindwa yamejibiwa na elimu zingine.

 

[Kentsuhcy Wrudate]

Kiyasansi Mungu hayupo. Lakini kwa elimu zingine zinathibitisha Mungu yupo.
Sayansi haina uwezo wa kujibu KILA kitu, hadi SAsa imejibu asilimia 10 tu ya mambo yaliyopo. 90 ya mambo imeshindwa yamejibiwa na elimu zingine.

Sayansi imejibu 10% tu ya maswali? Hapana... labda kama ni vinginevyo, dini ndo imejibu 10%, ambapo pia hata izo 10% zimethibitishwa kua sio ukweli, na kuna sababu za kwamba sio kweli

Baadhi ya maswali yaliojibiwa na elimu ya sayansi (na hayajajibiwa na elimu nyingine, kama unavosema);
1. Kwanini anga linaonekana lina rangu ya blue ukiwa ndani ya dunia
2. Kuna viumbw vya aina ngapi (at species level)
3. Namna sayari zinavotengenezeka
4. Kwanini ukiruka unarudi chini
5. Kwanini baadhi ya viumbe vilitoweka. Mfano tuseme, dinosaurs.
6. Nini kinafanya kuepo kuna usiku na mchana
7. Mvua inatokea wapi
8. Umbali wa mwezi kutoka dunian
9. Kwanini tunaugua, na dawa zinatibu vipi
10. Na hili la mwisho, popo ni mnyama au ndege? [emoji16]

Ukiangalia haya maswali yote, either kidini hayana majibu au yamejibiwa lakini ukienda kiuhalisia unaona kabisa tumepigwa...

 

[Kalunya]

Sayansi imejibu 10% tu ya maswali? Hapana... labda kama ni vinginevyo, dini ndo imejibu 10%, ambapo pia hata izo 10% zimethibitishwa kua sio ukweli, na kuna sababu za kwamba sio kweli

Baadhi ya maswali yaliojibiwa na elimu ya sayansi (na hayajajibiwa na elimu nyingine, kama unavosema);
1. Kwanini anga linaonekana lina rangu ya blue ukiwa ndani ya dunia
2. Kuna viumbw vya aina ngapi (at species level)
3. Namna sayari zinavotengenezeka
4. Kwanini ukiruka unarudi chini
5. Kwanini baadhi ya viumbe vilitoweka. Mfano tuseme, dinosaurs.
6. Nini kinafanya kuepo kuna usiku na mchana
7. Mvua inatokea wapi
8. Umbali wa mwezi kutoka dunian
9. Kwanini tunaugua, na dawa zinatibu vipi
10. Na hili la mwisho, popo ni mnyama au ndege? [emoji16]

Ukiangalia haya maswali yote, either kidini hayana majibu au yamejibiwa lakini ukienda kiuhalisia unaona kabisa tumepigwa...

1.Sayansi haina majibu kuhusu maisha ya ulimwengu usioonekana.
2.Kuhusu Ndoto
3.Nguvu ya mawazo
4.Roho
5.Maisha baada ya kifo
6.Viumbe vilivyopo katika sayari zingine
7.Asili ya mwanadamu
8.Nini asili ya chuki, wivu, hasira, wema, upendo,
9.Sayansi haina majibu juu ya Mungu ni nani na Shetani ni nani plus viwango vyao vya kuzidiana nguvu
10.Sayansi haiwezi dhibiti uchawi
KILA tatizo ujibiwa kwa elimu yake

 

[Ahmed Saidi]

Sayansi imejibu 10% tu ya maswali? Hapana... labda kama ni vinginevyo, dini ndo imejibu 10%, ambapo pia hata izo 10% zimethibitishwa kua sio ukweli, na kuna sababu za kwamba sio kweli

Baadhi ya maswali yaliojibiwa na elimu ya sayansi (na hayajajibiwa na elimu nyingine, kama unavosema);
1. Kwanini anga linaonekana lina rangu ya blue ukiwa ndani ya dunia
2. Kuna viumbw vya aina ngapi (at species level)
3. Namna sayari zinavotengenezeka
4. Kwanini ukiruka unarudi chini
5. Kwanini baadhi ya viumbe vilitoweka. Mfano tuseme, dinosaurs.
6. Nini kinafanya kuepo kuna usiku na mchana
7. Mvua inatokea wapi
8. Umbali wa mwezi kutoka dunian
9. Kwanini tunaugua, na dawa zinatibu vipi
10. Na hili la mwisho, popo ni mnyama au ndege? [emoji16]

Ukiangalia haya maswali yote, either kidini hayana majibu au yamejibiwa lakini ukienda kiuhalisia unaona kabisa tumepigwa...

Lengo la dini si kuelezea Mambo ya kisayansi, lengo kubwa la dini ni kumuelekeza binadamu namna ya kuishi na watu wengine. ingawa Kuna Mambo kadhaa ya kisayansi yapo katika vitabu vya dini ila wewe kwa kuwa mbali na dini ndio maana hata hufahamu.

Hapo mwanzo wanasayansi waliamini kuwa jua liko stationary. Vitabu vya dini vinasema jua nalo linatembea, ni hivi karibuni wanasayansi wamegundua kuwa jua nalo linazunguka milkyway Galaxy

Mambo ambayo vitabu vya dini imevisema na ni sahihi ni mengi
Mfano
°Ulimwengu kutanuka
°Drifting
°lightning kuwa ni umeme
°meeting of two seas that does not mix
°isostatic adjustment
°na vingine vingi

Sayansi ni kweli na imetusaidia kuwa vitu kama TV's, ndege, simu n.k lakini hi sayansi ina limit, Kuna baadhi ya vitu haviwezi kuwa proved scientifically.

NB: Wanasayansi wanaamini kuwa hi bahari imechunguzwa kwa asilimia 5 tu na kwa asilimia 95 bado binadamu hajagundua Kuna nini

 

[Kentsuhcy Wrudate]

1.Sayansi haina majibu kuhusu maisha ya ulimwengu usioonekana.
2.Kuhusu Ndoto
3.Nguvu ya mawazo
4.Roho
5.Maisha baada ya kifo
6.Viumbe vilivyopo katika sayari zingine
7.Asili ya mwanadamu
8.Nini asili ya chuki, wivu, hasira, wema, upendo,
9.Sayansi haina majibu juu ya Mungu ni nani na Shetani ni nani plus viwango vyao vya kuzidiana nguvu
10.Sayansi haiwezi dhibiti uchawi
KILA tatizo ujibiwa kwa elimu yake

1. Hakuna ushaidi wowote kuhusu ulimwengu usionekana wala huwezi kuleta ushahidi wowote ivo basi kisayansi hakuna kitu kama ulimwengu usioonekana.
2. Sayansi inamajibu kuhusu ndoto
3. "Nguvi ya mawazo" unamaana gani kusema ivo? Ukiwa na msongo wa mawazo unajirisk kupata matatizo ya akili...
4. Roho? Hakuna uwezekano wa kuprove existence ya roho, ivo hakuna kitu kama roho
5. Hakuna maisha baada ya kifo
6. Viumbe vilivo katika sayari nyingine havijagunduliwa. Kama vipo, vipi sayari gani? Itakua rahisi kuprove uwepo wao...
7. Asili ya mwanadamu, kuna theories nyingi zinazo suggest asili yetu. Uumbaji ikiwa far off from the truth...
8. Chuki, wivu, hasira, upendo? Hivi vitu vinategemea sana na jinsi mtu alivokizwa toka utotoni, mazingira aliopo na vitu kama ivo
9. Sayansi haiamini katika mungu, muumba wa ulimwengu wote. Inategemea unadefine vipi neno "mungu"
10. Kwenye uchawi tumepigwa, hamna kitu kama icho[emoji38]

 

[Kalunya]

1. Hakuna ushaidi wowote kuhusu ulimwengu usionekana wala huwezi kuleta ushahidi wowote ivo basi kisayansi hakuna kitu kama ulimwengu usioonekana.
2. Sayansi inamajibu kuhusu ndoto
3. "Nguvi ya mawazo" unamaana gani kusema ivo? Ukiwa na msongo wa mawazo unajirisk kupata matatizo ya akili...
4. Roho? Hakuna uwezekano wa kuprove existence ya roho, ivo hakuna kitu kama roho
5. Hakuna maisha baada ya kifo
6. Viumbe vilivo katika sayari nyingine havijagunduliwa. Kama vipo, vipi sayari gani? Itakua rahisi kuprove uwepo wao...
7. Asili ya mwanadamu, kuna theories nyingi zinazo suggest asili yetu. Uumbaji ikiwa far off from the truth...
8. Chuki, wivu, hasira, upendo? Hivi vitu vinategemea sana na jinsi mtu alivokizwa toka utotoni, mazingira aliopo na vitu kama ivo
9. Sayansi haiamini katika mungu, muumba wa ulimwengu wote. Inategemea unadefine vipi neno "mungu"
10. Kwenye uchawi tumepigwa, hamna kitu kama icho[emoji38]

Bado sana naona umejifungia kwenye box la kutegemea only sayansi ya darasani ndio KILA kitu.
Roho ndio inayoongoza MWILI inaongoza vipi sayansi haitokupa jibu

 

[Kentsuhcy Wrudate]

Bado sana naona umejifungia kwenye box la kutegemea only sayansi ya darasani ndio KILA kitu.
Roho ndio inayoongoza MWILI inaongoza vipi sayansi haitokupa jibu

Sayansi ina majibu. Sayansi ipo kwaajili ya kutafuta majibu. Ww ndio umejifungia kwenye box... nilishawahi kua muamini. Ila kwenye dini fix tu zimejaa. Nimesoma biblia yote, ninesoma baadhi ya aya za quran. Hamna kitu humo...

 

[Kalunya]

Sayansi ina majibu. Sayansi ipo kwaajili ya kutafuta majibu. Ww ndio umejifungia kwenye box... nilishawahi kua muamini. Ila kwenye dini fix tu zimejaa. Nimesoma biblia yote, ninesoma baadhi ya aya za quran. Hamna kitu humo...

Hizo elimu zingine zimekuwepo kabla ya sayansi.Vipi kuhusu nguvu za asili mfano negative na positive energy na jinsi zinavyoathiri watu je sayansi inayo majibu?