Mwanza: Mmiliki wa mabasi ya J4 aliyehukumiwa kunyongwa hadi kufa aachiwa huru

Mwanza: Mmiliki wa mabasi ya J4 aliyehukumiwa kunyongwa hadi kufa aachiwa huru

Chairman Lee said:
Hujaelewa Point yangu ndugu, huyo jamaa inasadikika alifanya tukio hilo wenyeji wa Mwanza tunafahamu, mazingira ya kesi na mwenendo unatia shaka.

Njoo Mwanza Leo uulize habari zake halafu kama utarudia kuandika hapa wewe ndio unatakiwa utulie .
Click to expand...
Hii kesi ya J'4 ni maarufu na inafahamika. Upo sahihi mkuu.
 
Ni sawa acha achiwe huru, wewe ni nani uingilie mahakama, kwanza unamfungaje tajiri akili za kimwendawazimu hizo
 
bagamoyo said:
MAAMUZI YA JAJI K.N ROBERT YA TAREHE 31 MAY 2022 KUWA HUKUMU YA AWALI KATIKA KESI IPITIWE UPYA. HUKUMU INA KURASA 6.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA IN THE DISTRICT REGISTRY OF MWANZA AT MWANZA CRIMINAL SESSIONS CASE NO.131 OF 2017

REPUBLIC

VERSUS

JUMANNE MAHENDE WANG'ANYI

RULING 30th & 31st May, 2022 ROBERT,J:-

This matter came up for hearing before me following an order for a fresh trial made by the Court of Appeal in Criminal Appeal No.204 of 2020.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the accused, Mr. Peter Kibatala, submitted that the proceedings of this case having been nullified by the Court of Appeal, this case needs to start afresh by plea taking and preliminary hearing before calling witnesses to testify. He expounded that, prior to an order directing for the case to be tried afresh the Court of Appeal made a finding that the High Court Proceedings were vitiated and invoked its revisional powers to nullify the proceedings and1 ..........
judgment of the High Court, quashed conviction and set aside the sentence there of. He argued that, proceedings of the High Court having been nullified, the trial of this case needs to commence from the start by plea taking and preliminary hearing before hearing of witnesses testimony.

To support his argument, he made reference to the case of Hsu Chin Tai and another vs The Republic, Criminal Appeal No.250 of 2012, CAT at Dar es Salaam (unreported) at page 14 and 15 where the Court of Appeal decided that a trial commences when an accused person appears and pleads before a competent Court. In response, Ms. Dorcas Akyoo, learned Senior State Attorney, had a different view to that of Mr. Kibatala. She submitted that, the decision of the Court of Appeal which nullified the proceedings of this case resulted from an irregularity on summing up to assessors and the Court of Appeal decided that the case should be tried afresh by a different Judge and a new set of assessors. She maintained that, since under section 265 of the Criminal Procedure Act trials before the High Court are conducted with the aid of assessors when witnesses are called to testify, then an order by the Court of Appeal for a fresh trial with a new set of assessors was intended to sta.......

........ This Court is also aware that, preliminary hearing proceedings are part and parcel of the trial case(see Shabani William vs The Republic, Criminal Appeal No.358 of 2014, CAT at Dodoma (unreported) and Juma Lyamwiwe vs Republic, Criminal Appeal No.42 of2001). Hence, an order for a retrial of the case, unless directed otherwise, includes preliminary hearing proceedings.

Therefore, an order for afresh trial needs to start from the plea taking (See the case of Hsu Chin Tai (supra)). In the end, I find merit in the argument by the learned counsel for the accused. Consequently, I direct that this case starts afresh from the stage of plea taking and all the subsequent procedures under the relevant law will be followed accordingly.

It is so ordered.

K.N Robert Judge

31/5/2022

READ MORE : Source : Republic Vs Jumanne Mahende Wang'anyi (Criminal Sessions Case 131 of 2017) [2022] TZHC 9807 (31 May 2022); | Tanzlii
Click to expand...


Court name
Court of Appeal of Tanzania
Registry
Court of Appeal Mwanza Registry
Case number
Criminal Appeal 204 of 2020

Jumanne Mahende Wang'anyi vs Republic (Criminal Appeal 204 of 2020) [2021] TZCA 725 (03 December 2021);​

Media neutral citation
[2021] TZCA 725
Coram

Mkuye, J.A.​


Kwariko, J.A.​


Maige, J.A.​


Source : Jumanne Mahende Wang'anyi vs Republic (Criminal Appeal 204 of 2020) [2021] TZCA 725 (03 December 2021); | Tanzlii
 
dadamlamayao said:
Una kiwango gani cha Elimu labda tuanze na hilo kwanza!!kazi ya Wakili ni KUTETEA ndio maana hata ukikutwa unachinja mtu live lakini still Kesi ikifika Mahakamani Wakili wa Utetezi atapanda kizimbani kukutetea kwamba HUKUUA!!hapo ni kucheza na vifungu vya SHERIA,hivyo wewe kuwa Mwanza na hata kama ulishuhudia J4 akiua lakini haibadili maana kwamba hatakiwi KUTETEWA
Click to expand...
Ingependeza zaidi hao walio uwawa, wakawa ndugu zako wa damu au kaka zako, au wazazi wako, hapo nadhani ungenielewa.
 
dadamlamayao said:
Una kiwango gani cha Elimu labda tuanze na hilo kwanza!!kazi ya Wakili ni KUTETEA ndio maana hata ukikutwa unachinja mtu live lakini still Kesi ikifika Mahakamani Wakili wa Utetezi atapanda kizimbani kukutetea kwamba HUKUUA!!hapo ni kucheza na vifungu vya SHERIA,hivyo wewe kuwa Mwanza na hata kama ulishuhudia J4 akiua lakini haibadili maana kwamba hatakiwi KUTETEWA
Click to expand...
Labda nikupe mfano,mwaka 2020 kuna muuza madawa ya kulevya maarufu Dar anaitwa AYOUB KIBOKO na mkewe walifungwa miaka 20 Jela na ile Mahakama ya Mafisadi na Makosa ya Uhujumu Uchumi kwa kukutwa na Gram 16 za Heroin nyumbani kwako,Jaji aliyewafunga anaitwa Jaji Lilian Mashaka.Wakakata Rufaa Mahakama ya Rufaa,mwezi Machi mwaka huu Jopo la Majaji watatu wa Mahakama ya Rufaa Jaji Sam Rumanyika,Jaji Gerald Ndika na Jaji Ignas Kitusi liliwaachia HURU wote wawili na sababu ni zifuatazo:
1)Majaji hawa walisema ni kweli AYOUB na Mkewe walikutwa na Madawa ya Kulevya nyumbani kwako hivyo hawana shaka na jambo hilo,lakini he taratibu za kuwafanyia Upekuzi zilifuatwa ipasavyo kama SHERIA ya Mwenendo wa Makosa ya Jinai inavyoelekeza??
 
dadamlamayao said:
Labda nikupe mfano,mwaka 2020 kuna muuza madawa ya kulevya maarufu Dar anaitwa AYOUB KIBOKO na mkewe walifungwa miaka 20 Jela na ile Mahakama ya Mafisadi na Makosa ya Uhujumu Uchumi kwa kukutwa na Gram 16 za Heroin nyumbani kwako,Jaji aliyewafunga anaitwa Jaji Lilian Mashaka.Wakakata Rufaa Mahakama ya Rufaa,mwezi Machi mwaka huu Jopo la Majaji watatu wa Mahakama ya Rufaa Jaji Sam Rumanyika,Jaji Gerald Ndika na Jaji Ignas Kitusi liliwaachia HURU wote wawili na sababu ni zifuatazo:
1)Majaji hawa walisema ni kweli AYOUB na Mkewe walikutwa na Madawa ya Kulevya nyumbani kwako hivyo hawana shaka na jambo hilo,lakini he taratibu za kuwafanyia Upekuzi zilifuatwa ipasavyo kama SHERIA ya Mwenendo wa Makosa ya Jinai inavyoelekeza??
Click to expand...
Ndio maana mahakama inatakiwa ijielekeze vizuri kuhusu swala la Technicality na Irregularity .

Watu wanao fanya watoto wa wenzao mazezeta na kuwapotezea ramani za maisha kama hao huku Yao ni kupigwa risasi hadharani bila Maelezo .
 
dadamlamayao said:
Una kiwango gani cha Elimu labda tuanze na hilo kwanza!!kazi ya Wakili ni KUTETEA ndio maana hata ukikutwa unachinja mtu live lakini still Kesi ikifika Mahakamani Wakili wa Utetezi atapanda kizimbani kukutetea kwamba HUKUUA!!hapo ni kucheza na vifungu vya SHERIA,hivyo wewe kuwa Mwanza na hata kama ulishuhudia J4 akiua lakini haibadili maana kwamba hatakiwi KUTETEWA
Click to expand...
Wakili ni afisa wa mahakama, lakini mtuhumiwa pia ana haki kisheria kujitetea kwa maana ya kuwakilishwa na Wakili. Ni kazi ya mahakama to prove beyond the reasonable doubts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Our Community

Regional Communities

Back
Top Bottom
Menu
Forums
New posts
Log in
Register