Siri kubwa kuliko zote kuhusu dunia yetu tambarare

Siri kubwa kuliko zote kuhusu dunia yetu tambarare

JE Dunia ina umbo gani?

  • Total voters
    710
anthony_art said:
Kwann isifae? Ni sawa na upige picha unashake kichwa Ile picha haitaonekana vzr Kwa sabab ya deflection
Click to expand...
Sasa Kwa mfano assume haya maelezo yako ndiyo picha umepewa unaambiwa ndiyo ushahidi wa Coriolis effects....itakutosha kuamini?
 
anthony_art said:
Hapa pafanyie kazi hateeb10 najua unataka nitaje east,north, south na west lakn hiyo ni map projection na ndio maana Kuna latitude na longitude halafu pia Kuna eastings na northings kama unajua mambo ya GIS utanielewa.
Click to expand...
Hapana,.... kiuhalisia Dunia ina sides na wewe unasema Tufe haliwezi kuwa na sides.

So,..huoni una contradict uhalisia unaposema Tufe halina sides?
 
hateeb10 said:
Kwahiyo ni sahihi au sio sahihi,.... kusema at that point where ships starts to descend towards the curve ndiyo mwanzo wa curvature?

Swali langu rahisi halitaki maelezo mengi,.....just sahihi/ sio sahihi.
Click to expand...
Kwa namna Fulani upo sahihi ila Kuna vitu Bado huweki sawa.

Ni kweli unaweza kusema at that point(ship ilipo) ship inaanza ku descend Kwa kurefer point ulipoyopo (observer) kwahy kutakuwa na point mbili apart (distance).
 
hateeb10 said:
Hujanielewa nadhani,... namaanisha chini yaani upande wa pili wa Dunia Tufe ambapo kimsingi ni sawa na kusema chini ya miguu yetu(Opposite side of the Tufe).... Umeliona hili Tufe 👉🏼🌍? Liangalie vizuri nadhani utanielewa namaanisha nini.
Click to expand...
Kusema chini ya miguu yetu unakosea

Saivi Kuna face ya Dunia inaface mwanga wa Jua ambayo inaweza kuwa opposite na sisi tulipo
 
hateeb10 said:
Sasa Kwa mfano assume haya maelezo yako ndiyo picha umepewa unaambiwa ndiyo ushahidi wa Coriolis effects....itakutosha kuamini?
Click to expand...
Kuna ushahidi zaidi ya huo, nimekwambia ocean current, wind patterns na trajectory motion
 
hateeb10 said:
Hapana,.... kiuhalisia Dunia ina sides na wewe unasema Tufe haliwezi kuwa na sides.

So,..huoni una contradict uhalisia unaposema Tufe halina sides?
Click to expand...
Kwanza naomba ukiri ya kuwa
1. Ulishawahi kukubali kuwa the earth is not a perfect sphere
2. Gravity is not a force
 
anthony_art said:
Kusema chini ya miguu yetu unakosea

Saivi Kuna face ya Dunia inaface mwanga wa Jua ambayo inaweza kuwa opposite na sisi tulipo
Click to expand...
Sawa ngoja niliweke swali vizuri...➡️ Kwamba, ukizingatia Dunia ni Tufe na inazunguka Je, hakuna time ambayo Jua linakua chini ya miguu yetu?

Yaani ipo hivi, wakati Jua lipo juu ya utosi (mchana) maana yake lipo juu ya vichwa vyetu,....so hiyo inamaanisha kuna time Jua huwa linakua lipo chini ya miguu yetu(Usiku) in reference to the other side of Dunia Tufe.
 
hateeb10 said:
Sawa ngoja niliweke swali vizuri...➡️ Kwamba, ukizingatia Dunia ni Tufe na inazunguka Je, hakuna time ambayo Jua linakua chini ya miguu yetu?

Yaani ipo hivi, wakati Jua lipo juu ya utosi (mchana) maana yake lipo juu ya vichwa vyetu,....so hiyo inamaanisha kuna time Jua huwa linakua lipo chini ya miguu yetu in reference to the other side of Dunia Tufe.
Click to expand...
Basi ngoja nikuelewe ivo ivo?
Ndio ni kweli, kama tu utaamini Jua linamove. Ila Jua halimove kwahy kusema Kuna muda Jua linakuwa juu ya vichwa vyetu alafu baadae linakuwa chini ya miguu yetu hiyo statement imekaa kama Jua ndio linamove
 
anthony_art said:
Kwanza naomba ukiri ya kuwa
1. Ulishawahi kukubali kuwa the earth is not a perfect sphere
2. Gravity is not a force
Click to expand...
1. Yes, nakubali earth is not a perfect sphere kwasababu msimamo ni kwamba kuna maswali logically ambayo Mtu ukijiuliza unaona kabisa haiwezekani Dunia kuwa perfect sphere,...kama hivi 👉🏼 🌍 flattened earth ndiyo inaingia akilini Kwa kuwa hata logic inakubali.

2. Ndiyo nishawahi kusema gravity sio force (hata Einstein asha confirm kuhusu hili)........ Gravity atleast ukijaribu kuihusianisha na magnetism Inakua inaingia akilini tofauti na kusema kwamba gravity ndiyo inasababisha vitu kuanguka,....na kuichomekea sehemu isipohusika.
 
hateeb10 said:
. Yes, nakubali earth is not a perfect sphere kwasababu msimamo ni kwamba kuna maswali logically ambayo Mtu ukijiuliza unaona kabisa haiwezekani Dunia kuwa perfect sphere,...kama hivi 👉🏼 🌍 flattened earth ndiyo inaingia akilini Kwa kuwa hata logic inakubali.
Click to expand...
Good,
Mfano: "Love is not quantifiable."
Hii statement haimaanishi love doesn't exist, but is not quantifiable. Si ndivyo?
 
hateeb10 said:
Ndiyo nishawahi kusema gravity sio force (hata Einstein asha confirm kuhusu hili)........ Gravity atleast ukijaribu kuihusianisha na magnetism Inakua inaingia akilini tofauti na kusema kwamba gravity ndiyo inasababisha vitu kuanguka,....na kuichomekea sehemu isipohusika.
Click to expand...
Kwahy gravity ipo, kwako ww inawork vipi?
 
anthony_art said:
Basi ngoja nikuelewe ivo ivo?
Ndio ni kweli, kama tu utaamini Jua linamove. Ila Jua halimove kwahy kusema Kuna muda Jua linakuwa juu ya vichwa vyetu alafu baadae linakuwa chini ya miguu yetu hiyo statement imekaa kama Jua ndio linamove
Click to expand...
Hapana,...hapo nime assume Jua lipo stationary kama unavyotaka kisha Dunia inazunguka,...So kwa mantiki hiyo kuna muda Jua linakua juu ya utosi wetu (mchana) then kadri Dunia inavyozunguka kuna muda Jua linakua chini ya miguu yetu (usiku)

Vipi ukitafakari hapo..
 
anthony_art said:
Good,
Mfano: "Love is not quantifiable."
Hii statement haimaanishi love doesn't exist, but is not quantifiable. Si ndivyo?
Click to expand...
Yaan kama ambavyo kwenye Statement ya Earth is not a perfect sphere haimaanishi Dunia haipo, ila sio perfect sphere, yaan inadeviate from sphere.

Sijui unanielewa? Yaani ni sawa useme binadamu ni viumbe visivyokamili, haimaanishi binadamu sio viumbe, ila ni viumbe ila visivyokamili.

Nikirejea kwenye Statement ya EARTH IS NOT A PERFECT SPHERE haimaanishi Dunia sio sphere, lakin ni sphere isiyokamilika. Kwa kitaalamu wanaita oblate sphere.

An oblate sphere refers to a sphere that is slightly flattened at the poles and bulging at the equator,


hateeb10
 
hateeb10 said:
Hapana,...hapo nime assume Jua lipo stationary kama unavyotaka kisha Dunia inazunguka,...So kwa mantiki hiyo kuna muda Jua linakua juu ya utosi wetu (mchana) then kadri Dunia inavyozunguka kuna muda Jua linakua chini ya miguu yetu (usiku)

Vipi ukitafakari hapo..
Click to expand...
Mbona hamna shida hapo? Au mm sijaelewa? Jaribu hata kuchukua mpira weka kitu chochote (sample A) juu ya mpira uki assume ni wewe, alafu chukua kitu kingne (sample B) ambacho uta assume ni Jua then rotate mpira uone kama hakuna time sample B(Jua) itakuwa juu ya sample A(wewe) na Kuna time sample B(Jua) kitakuwa chini ya sample A(yaani upande wa pili wa mpira kutoka ulipo wewe kama usemavyo.
 
hateeb10 said:
Hapana,...hapo nime assume Jua lipo stationary kama unavyotaka kisha Dunia inazunguka,...So kwa mantiki hiyo kuna muda Jua linakua juu ya utosi wetu (mchana) then kadri Dunia inavyozunguka kuna muda Jua linakua chini ya miguu yetu (usiku)

Vipi ukitafakari hapo..
Click to expand...
Mbona hamna shida hapo? Au mm sijaelewa? Jaribu hata kuchukua mpira weka kitu chochote (sample A) juu ya mpira uki assume ni wewe, alafu chukua kitu kingne (sample B) ambacho uta assume ni Jua then rotate mpira uone kama hakuna time sample B(Jua) itakuwa juu ya sample A(wewe) na Kuna time sample B(Jua) kitakuwa chini ya sample A(yaani upande wa pili wa mpira kutoka ulipo wewe kama usemavyo
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Our Community

Regional Communities

Back
Top Bottom
Menu
Forums
New posts
Log in
Register