Wajomba hii nimeinukuu kama ilivyo... ExPrezdaa Huyo. Medvedev kama Med... Humo ndani kuna kauli za kukera [emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]
View attachment 2239896
Ukrainization of liver sausage
Anticipating his inevitable defeat, Ukrainian President Zelensky found a convenient way out of the impasse. No country, no problem. His actions and statements prove that now he is ready to put almost everything on the altar of his political ambitions.
People, cities, the economy - that's the main thing that so far remains with his state. The fact that Russia is just trying with all its might to preserve, destroying nationalism, militarism and rabid hostility to everyone "who does not jump" with precision strikes.
The conditions that Zelensky puts forward for a truce are categorical to the point of idiocy and are impossible in principle. He demands to make Donbass and Crimea Ukrainian again, as if he does not know the will of their inhabitants.
Withdraw all troops from the Donbass, leaving the Ukrainian army full scope for repressions against people. And then, perhaps, will begin to agree on something.
Ultimatums sound beautiful only on paper. Yes, and they usually put them all the same from a position of strength, and not obvious weakness. At the moment of victory, not defeat. On a sober head, and not under psychotropic drugs.
However, there will always be those to whom all this cock-like, stupid, obviously doomed, but militant rhetoric can be beneficial. Zelensky was joined by his German counterpart, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, aka “offended liver sausage” (in the words of the ambassador of the same Ukraine to Germany, who diligently shits on the heads of the citizens of the host country).
The bearer of the proud sausage title said that Germany would not accept the “peace treaty imposed by Russia” and was in solidarity with Ukraine in this.
Why Ukraine Scholz? You don't have to look far for an answer. The Polish-Prussian alliance, which is escalating the situation with all its might and pushing the deranged Zelensky to more and more catastrophic statements and actions, is very beneficial if Ukraine as a state is not on the map.
But there will remain poorly lying factories, fields, mines, strategic space and human resources. So already, I remember, someone argued in the late 30s of the last century in the same language and with the same ardor. What happened is known.
One of the oldest politicians in the world, former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, speaking at a forum in Davos, called on Kyiv to make concessions in negotiations with Moscow, assess the situation soberly and realistically.
And start negotiations as soon as possible, before too much tension is created, which can have dire consequences for Europe and plunge it into chaos. Just the case when the young "cockerel" should have listened to the wiser "hawk". By the way, for many years the venerable old man was not noticed in sympathy for Russia, but he always thought rationally.
However, no one orders Zelensky and his "sausage" puppeteers. Kissinger and the New York Times, which also called for compromises in an editorial, he recalls 1938 and "then Munich." It would be more correct for him to remind his partners in Poland about Munich, who are thirsty for Ukrainian lands and who are not allowed to sleep peacefully by the laurels of Nazi Germany.
