Tafadhali sana, kama hujui maana ya siasa usiandike mada za kisiasa!

Tafadhali sana, kama hujui maana ya siasa usiandike mada za kisiasa!

Kwa mleta mada hujui kizungu, uwasilishaji wako ni ujinga mtupu; you can’t write nor understand English.
What a thunderous verdict! Yet methinks your proclamation, while spirited, falters upon its own scaffold. For language, whether clad in the regalia of Oxford or in the plain garb of Galilee, is but a vessel; what matters is not the accent of the tongue but the tenor of the truth conveyed. And some truths, however derided, remain untarnished by ridicule.
 
you can’t write nor understand English.
Mzee mwenzangu, wewe pia umekosea hicho kithungu chako. The sentence “you can’t write nor understand English” is not grammatically standard in English. The issue is the use of “nor” after “can’t”.
 
Within the interminably oscillating palimpsest of this terrestrial concatenation, where vicissitudes writhe in kaleidoscopic infinitude and temporality itself submits to recursive aberration, there subsists an anomaly of such preternatural incongruity that the multitudes, loquacious to the point of hermeneutic delirium and enmeshed within their own ceaseless discursive gyrations, devote inexhaustible faculties to the exhumation and exegetical prolixity of politico-civic architectures, yet when enjoined to distill or emanate a singular syntagmatic efflux gesturing toward the ineffable noumenon of governance, they collapse into an epistemic abysm, bereft of scaffolding, as though the gnomic locus of apprehension were ensconced within a labyrinthine empyrean reliquary, encrypted in penumbral effulgences beyond ontological penetration or exegetical reconnaissance.

In concomitant, transmundane isomorphism, a plenitude of sentient loci, obstinately recalcitrant to acknowledging the transcendent apotheosis that might liberate the ensnared anima, find themselves entangled within an opaque morass of cognitive-lexical impermeability; the semantic filaments, ontic conduits, hermetic lexicons requisite for any faintest glimmer of apprehension remain ensconced in chiaroscuric empyrean, impervious to philological excavation, exegetical unspooling, or hyperbolically pedantic ruminations, producing a gestalt of sublime incomprehensibility where the very notion of comprehension transmutes into a spectral, tantalizing phantasm, oscillating perpetually between the fathomable and the ineffably arcane.
Kumbe watu wa mabombastic bado mpo!
 
Kuna kile kidada EATV kutoka tarime
huwa kinaleta swaga za hivi kinatafuta misamiati mpka Mishipa ya shingo inakitoka
 
Haven’t I spent enough time, to explain why it illogical.

Furthermore I went into length to explain myself by posting ‘A level books’ on English language and Literature on what is acceptable.

And yet you are asking me, to accept; gibberish English is still OK 😤😤😤

The only way you’d think mleta mada kaandika kitu cha maana ni kama hujui kizungu.

Otherwise it’s just stupid.
I understand it's dense, but dense doesn’t equal illogical. If the grammar and structure are sound, calling it ‘ujinga mtupu’ seems more like a reaction to unfamiliar vocabulary than to actual nonsense.
 
Within the interminably oscillating palimpsest of this terrestrial concatenation, where vicissitudes writhe in kaleidoscopic infinitude and temporality itself submits to recursive aberration, there subsists an anomaly of such preternatural incongruity that the multitudes, loquacious to the point of hermeneutic delirium and enmeshed within their own ceaseless discursive gyrations, devote inexhaustible faculties to the exhumation and exegetical prolixity of politico-civic architectures, yet when enjoined to distill or emanate a singular syntagmatic efflux gesturing toward the ineffable noumenon of governance, they collapse into an epistemic abysm, bereft of scaffolding, as though the gnomic locus of apprehension were ensconced within a labyrinthine empyrean reliquary, encrypted in penumbral effulgences beyond ontological penetration or exegetical reconnaissance.

In concomitant, transmundane isomorphism, a plenitude of sentient loci, obstinately recalcitrant to acknowledging the transcendent apotheosis that might liberate the ensnared anima, find themselves entangled within an opaque morass of cognitive-lexical impermeability; the semantic filaments, ontic conduits, hermetic lexicons requisite for any faintest glimmer of apprehension remain ensconced in chiaroscuric empyrean, impervious to philological excavation, exegetical unspooling, or hyperbolically pedantic ruminations, producing a gestalt of sublime incomprehensibility where the very notion of comprehension transmutes into a spectral, tantalizing phantasm, oscillating perpetually between the fathomable and the ineffably arcane.
Yaani Siasa ni Uongo Uongo unaofanana fanana kidogo na kaujikweli kweli kwa mbaaalii 😳 ??!

Dah! Jf ni kiboko yao ! 😀
 
This is coming after me posting on what is considered standard English in post #93.

Salaleh lakini wabongo tunakipaji cha kukera.
Salaleh! So using words beyond BBC announcers’ simplicity automatically makes one ‘stupid’ in English-speaking societies? Fascinating logic. Grammatically correct and coherent language is apparently only valid if it’s spoon-fed in basic vocabulary. By that reasoning, Shakespeare must have been a serial offender of ‘ujinga mtupu'
 
Within the interminably oscillating palimpsest of this terrestrial concatenation, where vicissitudes writhe in kaleidoscopic infinitude and temporality itself submits to recursive aberration, there subsists an anomaly of such preternatural incongruity that the multitudes, loquacious to the point of hermeneutic delirium and enmeshed within their own ceaseless discursive gyrations, devote inexhaustible faculties to the exhumation and exegetical prolixity of politico-civic architectures, yet when enjoined to distill or emanate a singular syntagmatic efflux gesturing toward the ineffable noumenon of governance, they collapse into an epistemic abysm, bereft of scaffolding, as though the gnomic locus of apprehension were ensconced within a labyrinthine empyrean reliquary, encrypted in penumbral effulgences beyond ontological penetration or exegetical reconnaissance.

In concomitant, transmundane isomorphism, a plenitude of sentient loci, obstinately recalcitrant to acknowledging the transcendent apotheosis that might liberate the ensnared anima, find themselves entangled within an opaque morass of cognitive-lexical impermeability; the semantic filaments, ontic conduits, hermetic lexicons requisite for any faintest glimmer of apprehension remain ensconced in chiaroscuric empyrean, impervious to philological excavation, exegetical unspooling, or hyperbolically pedantic ruminations, producing a gestalt of sublime incomprehensibility where the very notion of comprehension transmutes into a spectral, tantalizing phantasm, oscillating perpetually between the fathomable and the ineffably arcane.
Khaaa
 
Within the interminably oscillating palimpsest of this terrestrial concatenation, where vicissitudes writhe in kaleidoscopic infinitude and temporality itself submits to recursive aberration, there subsists an anomaly of such preternatural incongruity that the multitudes, loquacious to the point of hermeneutic delirium and enmeshed within their own ceaseless discursive gyrations, devote inexhaustible faculties to the exhumation and exegetical prolixity of politico-civic architectures, yet when enjoined to distill or emanate a singular syntagmatic efflux gesturing toward the ineffable noumenon of governance, they collapse into an epistemic abysm, bereft of scaffolding, as though the gnomic locus of apprehension were ensconced within a labyrinthine empyrean reliquary, encrypted in penumbral effulgences beyond ontological penetration or exegetical reconnaissance.
Duh,
Hiyo paragraph nzima niliyo quote hapo juu ni sentensi moja maana ina kama pekee, haina kituo !!

Huyu anahitaji kutolewa maji upesi ili akae sawa
 
Isijekuwa wamemywesha bia mtumishi wa bwana
Kama wamemnywesha bia akaweza kuongea hicho kithungu complicated hivyo, kwanini yule Mwendazake hawakumnywesha bia kabla hajahojiwa na wale journalists? Maana aliulizwa maswali kwa kithungu kama hicho akashindwa kuyajibu!
 
If you want to pose as an English linguistic, you ought first to understand the benchmark of accepted language.

Apparently you don’t even understand bbc, sets the barrier (go Google the meaning of BBC English).

In details I have posted books on English, they cover topics from the evolution of the language to where it is today.

If you want me to entertain your ignorance on the language; I am happy to; the cheat books are on my lap.

Pathetic

View attachment 3444822

Hizo ni dhana zangu nijaribu sasa, kama unajiamini unajua kizungu.

Utaahira wenu ni kudhani mna uhalali wa kutoa vichwani mwenu, with confidence which is beyond me.

You people don’t read hilo lipo wazi, mtu anaesoma hawezi kuwa na confidence mlizonazo mataahira.

Jeez you don’t even understand the yard stick of acceptable English is the mainstream media.
I see your point about BBC English as a benchmark, but using that as the sole measure of competence seems… limiting. Complex and grammatically correct English isn’t ignorance; it’s just a different register. By that logic, many literary giants throughout history would also be ‘pathetic.’
 
Within the interminably oscillating palimpsest of this terrestrial concatenation, where vicissitudes writhe in kaleidoscopic infinitude and temporality itself submits to recursive aberration, there subsists an anomaly of such preternatural incongruity that the multitudes, loquacious to the point of hermeneutic delirium and enmeshed within their own ceaseless discursive gyrations, devote inexhaustible faculties to the exhumation and exegetical prolixity of politico-civic architectures, yet when enjoined to distill or emanate a singular syntagmatic efflux gesturing toward the ineffable noumenon of governance, they collapse into an epistemic abysm, bereft of scaffolding, as though the gnomic locus of apprehension were ensconced within a labyrinthine empyrean reliquary, encrypted in penumbral effulgences beyond ontological penetration or exegetical reconnaissance.

In concomitant, transmundane isomorphism, a plenitude of sentient loci, obstinately recalcitrant to acknowledging the transcendent apotheosis that might liberate the ensnared anima, find themselves entangled within an opaque morass of cognitive-lexical impermeability; the semantic filaments, ontic conduits, hermetic lexicons requisite for any faintest glimmer of apprehension remain ensconced in chiaroscuric empyrean, impervious to philological excavation, exegetical unspooling, or hyperbolically pedantic ruminations, producing a gestalt of sublime incomprehensibility where the very notion of comprehension transmutes into a spectral, tantalizing phantasm, oscillating perpetually between the fathomable and the ineffably arcane.
Mtumishi umepatwa na nini huko uliko? Hiki Kiinglish chako hakina msaada kwa wasomaji wa kawaida! Hivyo ulichokisudia kuwasilisha nina uhakika asilimia kubwa ya walengwa hawajakielewa.
Rudi tu kwenye kuhubiri Injili.
 
Back
Top Bottom