slow_learner
Senior Member
- Nov 24, 2016
- 152
- 144
Hebu ngoja nicomment ili nisipitwe na taarifa za uzi huu. Maana mwandishi inaonekana kabisa ana msongo wa mawazo.
Understood. One can respect BBC English as a benchmark and still recognize that coherent, advanced English is not ignorance. Rest well, Sir; you’ve clearly earned a good night’s sleep defending simplicity.The mere fact you question BBC English as a benchmark; says a lot about your limitations on understanding of English language.
From that reasoning apparently you haven’t read an elementary English Language book, to understand what sets bars on accepted vocabulary.
I would have entertained your pathetic ignorance if I had time, unfortunately I must go to sleep.
Utaahira wenu ni kuwajifurahisha wenyewe JF.
Post will be deleted baada ya kuekua zege jikoni happy to leave you with circumstancial victory.
Fikra sahihi, huja kwa lugha sahihi.vip hujaelewa.?
Mtoa mada, katika posts zake amesema kwamba, hivi sasa jukwaa hili linaitwa JamiiAfrica na lina-accessiwa na nchi ambazo kiingereza ni kama lugha mama, hivyo maneno magumu aliyoyatumia, kwa watu wa nchi hizo, ni maneno yao ya kawaida, yanaeleweka bila shida!Fikra sahihi, huja kwa lugha sahihi.
Imagine kijijini hakuna maji, utumie lugha hii kwa wananchi,
Watawezaje kujiletea maendeleo?
Kumbe Elimu isipochakatwa kugeuka kuwa maarifa kutatua changamoto za watu, inakuwa upuuzi na mzigo mixer utumwa.
Basi tufanye ni mgombea uko jukwaani unaomba kura pale geita, ukitumia lugha hiyo pale, utaeleweka? Sasa kumbe Elimu ibadilike kuwa nyenzo ya kueleweka na Kila mtu kupata uelewa na utatuzi wa pamoja wa changamoto za watu.
Alichoandika mtoa mada ni ujinga,
Umeelewa?
SUBIRI BAADA YA DAKIKA CHACHE UTAELEWA KWANINI NIMETUMIA HICHO KIINGLISHMtumishi umepatwa na nini huko uliko? Hiki Kiinglish chako hakina msaada kwa wasomaji wa kawaida! Hivyo ulichokisudia kuwasilisha nina uhakika asilimia kubwa ya walengwa hawajakielewa.
Rudi tu kwenye kuhubiri Injili.
Kha, mpaka uchaguzi mkuu uishe tutasoma mengiYour alarm is duly noted! Yet fear not, for my faculties remain firmly anchored. The language thou encounterest is but the natural oscillation of a mind that pirouettes along less-trodden corridors of expression—strange to some, perplexing to many, yet perfectly coherent to those willing to follow its labyrinthine cadence 😎
The River Between.Within the interminably oscillating palimpsest of this terrestrial concatenation, where vicissitudes writhe in kaleidoscopic infinitude and temporality itself submits to recursive aberration, there subsists an anomaly of such preternatural incongruity that the multitudes, loquacious to the point of hermeneutic delirium and enmeshed within their own ceaseless discursive gyrations, devote inexhaustible faculties to the exhumation and exegetical prolixity of politico-civic architectures, yet when enjoined to distill or emanate a singular syntagmatic efflux gesturing toward the ineffable noumenon of governance, they collapse into an epistemic abysm, bereft of scaffolding, as though the gnomic locus of apprehension were ensconced within a labyrinthine empyrean reliquary, encrypted in penumbral effulgences beyond ontological penetration or exegetical reconnaissance.
In concomitant, transmundane isomorphism, a plenitude of sentient loci, obstinately recalcitrant to acknowledging the transcendent apotheosis that might liberate the ensnared anima, find themselves entangled within an opaque morass of cognitive-lexical impermeability; the semantic filaments, ontic conduits, hermetic lexicons requisite for any faintest glimmer of apprehension remain ensconced in chiaroscuric empyrean, impervious to philological excavation, exegetical unspooling, or hyperbolically pedantic ruminations, producing a gestalt of sublime incomprehensibility where the very notion of comprehension transmutes into a spectral, tantalizing phantasm, oscillating perpetually between the fathomable and the ineffably arcane.
In the monolith of civic discourse,Within the interminably oscillating palimpsest of this terrestrial concatenation, where vicissitudes writhe in kaleidoscopic infinitude and temporality itself submits to recursive aberration, there subsists an anomaly of such preternatural incongruity that the multitudes, loquacious to the point of hermeneutic delirium and enmeshed within their own ceaseless discursive gyrations, devote inexhaustible faculties to the exhumation and exegetical prolixity of politico-civic architectures, yet when enjoined to distill or emanate a singular syntagmatic efflux gesturing toward the ineffable noumenon of governance, they collapse into an epistemic abysm, bereft of scaffolding, as though the gnomic locus of apprehension were ensconced within a labyrinthine empyrean reliquary, encrypted in penumbral effulgences beyond ontological penetration or exegetical reconnaissance.
In concomitant, transmundane isomorphism, a plenitude of sentient loci, obstinately recalcitrant to acknowledging the transcendent apotheosis that might liberate the ensnared anima, find themselves entangled within an opaque morass of cognitive-lexical impermeability; the semantic filaments, ontic conduits, hermetic lexicons requisite for any faintest glimmer of apprehension remain ensconced in chiaroscuric empyrean, impervious to philological excavation, exegetical unspooling, or hyperbolically pedantic ruminations, producing a gestalt of sublime incomprehensibility where the very notion of comprehension transmutes into a spectral, tantalizing phantasm, oscillating perpetually between the fathomable and the ineffably arcane.