Tanzania yashindwa kwenye kesi, yaamuriwa kulipa fidia ya zaidi ya Tsh. Bilioni 260

Tanzania yashindwa kwenye kesi, yaamuriwa kulipa fidia ya zaidi ya Tsh. Bilioni 260

Kikwajuni One said:
Aliyevunja ndio amekosea.Angetizama kwanza kuvunja kuna maslahi au hakuna.Mkataba wowote hata wa kupangisha frem ya biashara,anayevunja mkataba ndio inakula kwake.Tumia akili.
Click to expand...
Aliyeingia ndio mpumbavu, aliyevunja ndio alitumia akili, huwezi kuingia mkataba wa kipuuzi usio na maslahi kwa taifa halafu uje kumlaumu yule aliyeuvunja, wewe ndie utumie akili.
 
Arovera said:
Ndio maana tunasema shida sio magufuli ni hawa wajinga wanaoingia mikataba mibovu ambayo haina maslahi kwa nchi kwa mfano magufuli baada ya kugundua hizo ni dili za watu alitunga sheria ya ulinzi wa rasilimali, ambapo kesi zinazohusu rasilimali za tanzania zitaamuliwa kwenye mahakama zetu, washenzi leo hii hiyo sheria wameenda kuifuta kabisa na hawaitaki wakati walipitisha wao hatari sana
Click to expand...
Hawa watu ni wahuni na ccm imewakumbatia.
 
Econometrician said:
Uwekezaji Tanzania ni kuzinufaisha Famila chache na kuacha umasikini kwa malilioni ya watu, ni mara 1000 kama hatuna technolojia na fedha kuacha maliasili zilizopo labda watoto wetu watakuja kutafuta njia bora zaidi.
Click to expand...
Tatizo ni teuzi za kujuana mkuu watu wanapeana kazi, waliosani hii mikataba ni ndugu wa wakubwa na makada wa CCM
 
Sildenafil Citrate said:
Kituo cha Kimataifa cha Usuluhishi wa Migogoro ya Uwekezaji (ICSID) kimeiamuru Tanzania kulipa dola milioni 109.5 (zaidi ya bilioni 260 za Tanzania) kwa kampuni za uchimbaji madini zilizosajiliwa Uingereza, Ntaka Nickel Holdings Ltd na Nachingwea UK Ltd, kufuatia uamuzi wa mwaka 2018 kufuta Leseni yao ya Kuhifadhi madini ya Nikeli.

Kampuni hizo zilifanikiwa kuishitaki Tanzania katika mahakama ya Benki ya Dunia kwa kukiuka majukumu yake chini ya Mkataba wa Uwekezaji wa Nchi Baina ya Uingereza na Tanzania (BIT) na sheria za kimataifa kwa kunyang'anya leseni hiyo.

Tanzania pia imetakiwa kulipa dola milioni 3.859 za gharama za kisheria kwa wadai, pamoja na ada na gharama za mahakama ya ICSID.

Kampuni ya Indiana Resources Ltd iliyoorodheshwa kutoka Australia, ambayo ndiyo wanahisa wengi wa mradi wa nikeli wa Ntaka, iliwahi kutishia kukamata ndege zinazoendeshwa na Kampuni ya Air Tanzania (ATCL). Indiana inasema sasa itachukua hatua haraka kutekeleza tuzo ya mahakama

Kampuni za EcoDevelopment na EcoEnergy za Uswidi mwaka jana zilishinda uamuzi wa $165m dhidi ya Tanzania kwenye ICSID kufuatia uamuzi wa serikali ya Magufuli kuwanyang'anya wawekezaji hao ardhi ya Bagamoyo, kinyume na Mkataba wa Uwekezaji wa Nchi Baina ya Sweden na Tanzania (BIT)

Kampuni hizo zilikamata ndege ya Airbus inayomilikiwa na Wakala wa Serikali wa Ndege za Serikali (TGFA) inayoendeshwa na ATCL ili kutekeleza hukumu ya ICSID.

Ndege hiyo yenye namba za usajili 5H-TCH hivi karibuni ilirejea Tanzania baada ya serikali kumaliza kesi hiyo.

View attachment 2691787
Click to expand...
Hawa waliotuingiza Chaka mpaka kuishia kupata hasara kama hizi wawajibishwe.
 
bagamoyo said:
Mkataba huu je CCM italaani mabeberu ?

Serikali ya CCM itambue hakuna mwekezaji aliye na fedha mfukoni.

Mwejezaji akisha saini kuenda kunadi mradi wake ktk mabenki na wabia wengine ili ku mobilise resources yaani kupata rasilimali fedha, watu mfano kutafuta mine engineers, kuhamisha heavy equipments tena kwa kukodisha, kutayarisha usafiri wa mavifaa haya mazito n.k, kulipa insurance n.k n.k

Hivyo ghafla ukimfutia mkataba au leseni wengi walio nyuma ya mwekezaji wanapata hasara ya mali, fedha,watu, wakati, kukosa kipato walichotarajia, hadhi / goodwill ya aliyesuka deal hili na serikali ya Tanzania kushuka kwa kudhaniwa hawakufanya makubaliano yaliyostahili na waswahili hivyo wanaweza kukosa kazi siku za usoni sehemu zingine za dunia n.k

Hivyo hakuna namna hasara hiyo lazima Tanzania iilipe kwa maamuzi ya kutoona mbali wakati wa kumkubali mwekezaji ukifikiri ana fedha kibao mfukoni zimekaa tu kumbe jamaa hawa wana watu wengi wanaocheza na upatu katika miradi ya uwekezaji.

NACHINGWEA U.K. LIMITED (UK), NTAKA NICKEL HOLDINGS LIMITED (UK) AND NACHINGWEA NICKEL LIMITED (TANZANIA) V. TANZANIA refence Case ID: ​

ICSID Case No. ARB/20/38

N.B
Mkataba mbovu wa DP World nao una sifa hizo hizo za wawekezaji na huja na gharama zake kama hizo.
Click to expand...

 
Saa100 ameshasoma habari hii?

Na bado anautamani uke mkataba aliousaini wa DP world?

Kuna kila dalili kuwapima viongozi wetu uwexo wa akili zao otherwise tutarudi mwaka 1960
 
Tukisema kuhusu huu mkataba wa dp world,

Tunaonekana wakosoaji.....ona sasa.......hii ni baadhi tu ya mikataba ya kufanana na huo wa dp world...

lakini haufikii hata robo ya madudu yaliyomo kwenye MoU ya DP WORLD....TUKITAKA KUUVUNJA...LABDA KUUZA NCHI! GHARAMA ZAKE HAZILIPIKI!
 
bagamoyo said:
Kumbe jamaa hawa wana watu wengi wanaocheza upatu katika miradi ya uwekezaji wakisubiri haki ya walichotarajia lakini hakikuheshimiwa na Tanzania
Click to expand...

Indiana Resources : Compensation claim of AU$127m lodged against Tanzania


Market Screener | 26 July 2021
Indiana Resources : Compensation claim of AU$127m lodged against Tanzania
  • Memorial submission lodged with ICSID outlining quantum of compensation claim and damages against the United Republic of Tanzania for the expropriation of the Ntaka Hill Nickel Project
  • The Memorial provides the basis for compensation to the Claimants in the amount of AU$127 million, including interest which continues to accrue
  • Arbitral panel has confirmed the procedural timetable for arbitration - to conclude mid 2023
  • All legal costs funded through US$4.65m litigation funding facility
Indiana Resources Limited (ASX: IDA) (’Indiana’ or the ’Company’) provides the following update on arbitration with the United Republic of Tanzania over the expropriation of the Ntaka Hill Nickel Project ("the Project") and other breaches of the Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the United Republic of Tanzania for the Promotion and Protection of Investments ("UK-TanzaniaBIT" or "BIT").
As the majority shareholder in Ntaka Nickel Holdings Ltd ("NNHL") and Nachingwea UK Ltd ("NUK") (both incorporated in the United Kingdom) Indiana is the manager of the Joint Venture Project and is responsible for all activities with regards to the arbitration.
The Company is pleased to advise that NUK, NNHL and its subsidiary Nachingwea Nickel Limited ("NNL") (the "Claimants") have now filed their Memorial, a submission setting out its claims with ICSID (The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes), an organisation that is part of the World Bank Group. The Memorial contains the basis for compensation to the Claimants for AU$127 million (US$93.7million), that includes interest which continues to accrue.
The Claimants retained Mr Travis Taylor of Versant Partners, London, as its quantum expert to quantify the claim. LALIVE is representing the Claimants in the arbitration process. A litigation funding facility for US$4,653,400 is in place with Litigation Capital Management Limited ("LCM"), a firm listed on the Alternative Investment Market ("AIM") of the London Stock Exchange. The arbitration case is heard by a 3- person tribunal and is expected to conclude in H1 2023.
Company Comment
Indiana’s Executive Chairman Bronwyn Barnes said: "Indiana continues to make positive progress in regard to arbitration with the Government of Tanzania. As the manager and major shareholder of the Ntaka Hill Nickel Project establishing AU$127 million as compensation for Tanzania’s expropriation of what was once our flagship project is a very important milestone.
With litigation funding in place that secures all our legal costs associated with arbitration, Indiana is adequately resourced and well supported to deliver a positive outcome for our shareholders, and we look forward to reporting on further developments in due course."
Indiana Resources Limited | ABN 67 009 129 560 | Suite 3, 339 Cambridge St, Wembley WA 6014
ASX code: IDA | T +61 (8) 6241 1870| E info@indianaresources.com.au | www.indianaresources.com.au
Next Steps
The Arbitral Panel appointed by ICSID convened their first session in April 2021. Subsequent to this session, the procedural timetable for arbitration has been confirmed and is expected to conclude in mid 2023.
Background to Claim
In July 2017, the Government of Tanzania amended the Mining Act 2010 by, inter alia, abolishing the legislative basis for the Retention Licence classification with no replacement classification.
On 10 January 2018, Tanzania published the Mining (Mineral Rights) Regulations 2018, which cancelled all Retention Licences issued prior to 10 January 2018 at which point they ceased to have any legal effect. The rights over all areas under Retention Licences, including the Retention Licence held for the Project, were immediately transferred to the Government of Tanzania.
During the time from January 2018 to December 2019, the Company actively engaged with the Tanzanian Minister for Minerals and the Mining Commission in an effort to resolve a suitable tenure mechanism for the Project Licence to be reinstated.
At all times Tanzanian Government representatives reassured the Claimants’ representatives, as well as Indiana Board members that visited Tanzania for the purpose of collaborative engagement with the Government, that their historic investment would be recognised and that their rights would be respected and protected.
On 19 December 2019, the Mining Commission of Tanzania announced a public invitation to tender for the joint development of areas covered previously by Retention Licences. The invitation provided that the successful bidder should compensate the previous Retention Licence holder for its exploration costs incurred. This public invitation was not sent to the Company or the Claimants but was advertised on the website for the Ministry of Energy and Minerals.
On 20 December 2019, the Mining Commission of Tanzania announced a revised public invitation to tender, which removed the condition that the successful bidder compensate the previous retention licence holder for its exploration costs incurred.
Through the measures described above, Tanzania has removed the ownership of the Project from the Claimants, and in doing so has breached its obligations to the Claimants under the UK-Tanzania BIT and international law. These include, but are not limited to:
  1. Tanzania’s obligation not to nationalise or expropriate the Claimants’ investments or subject them to measures having effect equivalent to nationalisation or expropriation without prompt, adequate and effective compensation under Article 5(1) of the BIT; and
  2. Tanzania’s obligation to accord fair and equitable treatment and full protection and security to the Claimants’ investment and not to impair by unreasonable or discriminatory measures the maintenance, use, enjoyment or disposal of the Claimants’ investment under Article 2(2) of the BIT.
Article 8(3) of the BIT provides that the Claimants may submit the dispute to ICSID if the Claimants and Tanzania are unable to reach an agreement concerning the dispute within six months of the dispute arising (in this instance from the date of the Claimants’ notice of dispute being 14 January 2020).
2
Indiana Resources Limited | ABN 67 009 129 560 | Suite 3, 339 Cambridge St, Wembley WA 6014
ASX code: IDA | T +61 (8) 6241 1870| E info@indianaresources.com.au | www.indianaresources.com.au
The Claimants have engaged LALIVE, an international law firm, to act on their behalf. LALIVE has offices in Geneva, Zurich and London, and specialises in international arbitration. The firm has extensive experience in international investment arbitration concerning mining and other natural resources and is representing investors and States as counsel worldwide.
The Company has also secured a Litigation Funding Agreement ("LFA") for USD4,653,400 with LCM - a firm listed on the Alternative Investment Market ("AIM") of the London Stock Exchange. The LFA will cover legal costs in bringing the Claim to Arbitration against the Government of Tanzania on a non-recourse basis, ensuring that costs relating to arbitration will not be borne by Indiana’s shareholders.
The ICSID Convention has been ratified by 155 States, including Tanzania. An award issued by an ICSID tribunal is enforceable in any one of those 155 member States as if it were a judgment of one of their own courts. Partly because of this, States have overwhelmingly and historically complied voluntarily with the payment terms of such awards.
Ends
 
bagamoyo said:
An award issued by an ICSID tribunal is enforceable in any one of those 155 member States as if it were a judgment of one of their own courts. Partly because of this, States have overwhelmingly and historically complied voluntarily with the payment terms of such awards.
Click to expand...

☝Kwa wasomaji wa lugha ya kiSwahili tafsiri ya maneno hapo juu :

ANGALIZO KUBWA WALIOTOA ICSID KUHUSU NCHI 155 ZINA UWEZO KUIKABA TANZANIA KUHUSU MALIPO YA KESI HII HUSIKA

Hili angalizo ni muhimu kuwa hukumu hii inakaziwa ndani ya nchi 155 duniani zilizoridhia mikataba ya kimataifa kama vile hukumu imetolewa katika mahakama zao za 'Kisutu', 'Mbeya' au Mahakama yote ya nchi zilizoridhia kimataifa
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Our Community

Regional Communities

Back
Top Bottom
Menu
Forums
New posts
Log in
Register