Mmanu
JF-Expert Member
- Feb 11, 2015
- 2,103
- 1,419
Kinga yake ni mpaka kufa kwakeRais wa Tanzania akistaafu anashitakiwa?
Kinga yake ni mpaka kufa kwakeRais wa Tanzania akistaafu anashitakiwa?
Word.Ndio maana kuna muda hata kelele za katiba mpya ni kama kufuata mkumbo tu, hii hii iliyopo inasiginwa, hiyo mpya itakuja na kitu gani iwe ya kipekee na kuzingatiwa kila kitu.
Bora ingekua tunapambania kuheshimiwa kwa mifumo iliyopo na kutafuta ufumbuzi wa kwanini katiba iliyopo na taratibu zinakiukwa.
Ubabe.Kwani nini kimkwamishe kwenda mahakamai kutoa ushahidi mpaka wafike kwenye hatua ya kuandika arrest warrant? Uoga au ubabe tu?
Bila shaka lissu anayajua haya yote na anayo plan bI don’t see how Lissu gets his way in this. First, this is Tanzania—the system is rigged in favor of the big kahunas:
🔹The President is shielded by absolute constitutional immunity from any court processes or subpoenas while in office.
🔹The VP and PM are protected under the amended Basic Rights and Duties Enforcement Act, which insulates top leaders from individual court actions or personal capacity summonses. Because Tundu Lissu’s treason charges are tied to political events, public speeches, and state actions that took place during their tenure, Mpango and Majaliwa remain legally insulated. The law establishes that an official's actions belong to the State, not the individual. Therefore, even as private citizens, they cannot be personally dragged into court to testify about state operations; any legal inquiry must still be directed at the State through the Attorney General. Maybe if they just choose to testify voluntarily like how former President Mkapa proceeded in Costa Mahalu’s case. The probability of this happening is remote though.
Second, the High Court procedural discretion on relevance will be an extremely hard hurdle to overcome. Under Tanzanian criminal procedure, a court is not obligated to issue a subpoena just because a defendant requests one. The judges maintain strict gatekeeping power and will evaluate the relevance and necessity of the witnesses:
🔹The defense must demonstrate that a witness has direct, material, and firsthand knowledge of the specific facts of the alleged treason.
🔹The court will probably rule that calling the former second- and third-in-command is legally unnecessary, as the defense can obtain any relevant official government records or communications directly from active state repositories via the Attorney General.
Hapo ndipo lengo la lissu litatimia. Kuivua nguo mahakama na kuonyesha ni mhimili dhaifu. Ikifika hatua hiyo maana yake hata hakimu mwenyewe hawezi kuwa na confidence tena.Ubabe.
Hakuna jaji yoyote mwenye uthubutu huo.
Sheria gani au maoni yako tuKinga ya kutokua shahidi anayo sababu kuhudhulia mahakamani kwake ni hiyari na sio lazima.
Anaweza kusema siji, nitatuma mwakilishi au nitakuja
Mzee, Kwani si mara nyingi tu zimetolewa kauli kwamba mahakama inaendeshwa na remote meaning Mahakama ni dhaifu au zilishafutwa hizo kauli kiasi kwamba inahitajika proof nyingine kuonesha mmihili huo ni dhaifu?Hapo ndipo lengo la lissu litatimia. Kuivua nguo mahakama na kuonyesha ni mhimili dhaifu. Ikifika hatua hiyo maana yake hata hakimu mwenyewe hawezi kuwa na confidence tena.
Kwa kiasi fulani, hawa ni lightweight mazafakas, but the defense must still demonstrate that each of them has direct, material, and firsthand knowledge of the specific facts of the alleged treason.Vipi kuhusu TISS DIG, IGP, CDF ?
Kesi hii ina coverage kubwa zaidi. Kumbuka ishajadiliwa mpaka kwenye bunge la ulaya na marekaniMzee, Kwani si mara nyingi tu zimetolewa kauli kwamba mahakama inaendeshwa na remote meaning Mahakama ni dhaifu au zilishafutwa hizo kauli kiasi kwamba inahitajika proof nyingine kuonesha mmihili huo ni dhaifu?
In shaa Allah hayo mnayoyataka kuna siku yatatokea kweli katika nchi hii na hamtakuwa na uwezo wa kuyazuia . Hakuna aliyejuu ya sheria mnaogopa muuaji kwenda kutoa ushahidi wake.Rais anakutanishwa vipi na muhaini?yaani huo ni mpango wa kutaka kumalizia nia ovi ya uhaini
Mbona yote kayaweka sawa mahakamani. Raisi anatumiwa wito ni yeye kuamua kutii au hapana. Pili hakuna mtu katika Sheria zetu anayetoa ushaidi kwa ajili ya mtu mwingine. Lissu ajengewe sanamuLissu kuwaita mashahidi mahakamani akiwemo Rais wa nchi imekaaje kisheria ?
Kuna kizuizi chochote cha Sheria kuzia rais aliye madarakani kuwa shahidi katika kesi iliyo mahakamani?
Shahidi anaweza kutuma mtu kumuwakilisha kwa niaba yake mahakamani?
Hiyo wide coverage ndio itabadili mtazamo kwamba mahakama sio dhaifu?Kesi hii ina coverage kubwa zaidi. Kumbuka ishajadiliwa mpaka kwenye bunge la ulaya na marekani
Ya wapi hii....dia sisy...Kinga ya kutokua shahidi anayo sababu kuhudhulia mahakamani kwake ni hiyari na sio lazima.
Anaweza kusema siji, nitatuma mwakilishi au nitakuja
Bongo Rais yupo juu ya sheriaYa wapi hii....dia sisy...
Labda akiamua kulazimisha...Bongo Rais yupo juu ya sheria
2012 yes.Hakuwa Rais wakati huyo. Alishastaafu.