Uwezekano wa Rais aliye madarakani kuwa shahidi mahakamani ukoje kisheria?

[Bwana Tony Cipriano]

Mkapa alishaenda kumtetea Mahalu

Mkapa alikuwa very smart hata namna anavyoongea na kujenga hoja haikuwa shida kwake kuwa shahidi. Kwa upande mama ake Tlaahtlaah ameze barbiturates kabisa

 

[Natafuta Ajira]

Kwani huyo the so called rais ni Malaika?

Katiba yetu imempa hadhi ya mungu kabisa

 

[Idimulwa]

Rais anakutanishwa vipi na muhaini?yaani huo ni mpango wa kutaka kumalizia nia ovi ya uhaini

Muhaini atakuwaje na ovu kwa Rais?

 

[Natafuta Ajira]

Akikataa kwenda mahakamani nini kitatokea?

Kwanini akatae

 

[Mmanu]

Shahidi anapaswa kuwepo Mahakamani na kuhojiwa

View attachment 3654213

Swali dogo tu
Je mahakama inaweza kuandika hiyo warranty of arrest kwenda kwa Rais?

 

[Erythrocyte]

Swali dogo tu
Je mahakama inaweza kuandika hiyo warranty of arrest kwenda kwa Rais?

Ndio maana DPP anapambana Samia asiwe Shahidi wa Lissu

 

[Mmanu]

Ndio maana DPP anapambana Samia asiwe Shahidi wa Lissu

Tuache DPP kupambana tuje kisheria hii warranty of arrest inaweza kuandikwa na mahakama kwenda kwa Rais kushinikizwa akamatwe?

 

[Erythrocyte]

Tuache DPP kupambana tuje kisheria hii warranty of arrest inaweza kuandikwa na mahakama kwenda kwa Rais kushinikizwa akamatwe?

Sheria ni msumeno

 

[Natafuta Ajira]

Tuache DPP kupambana tuje kisheria hii warranty of arrest inaweza kuandikwa na mahakama kwenda kwa Rais kushinikizwa akamatwe?

Kwani nini kimkwamishe kwenda mahakamai kutoa ushahidi mpaka wafike kwenye hatua ya kuandika arrest warrant? Uoga au ubabe tu?

 

[Natafuta Ajira]

Lissu anaitumia hiyo kama mbinu ya kimkakati tu hapo rais aje au asije ni ushindi kwake.

Rais akienda mahakamani atatolewa knock out mapema kabisa, na asipoenda tayari mahakama itakua imevuliwa nguo na kuonekana ni dhaifu.

 

[GenuineMan]

Mimi nimemuelewa Katuga.
Kaukiza Rais akikataa kufika mahakamani, mahakama itafanya nini?

 

[The Monk]

Kwani Mambo mangapi yanafanywa kinyume cha Katiba kiasi kwamba hili la mahakama lionekane la kipekee?

Ndio maana kuna muda hata kelele za katiba mpya ni kama kufuata mkumbo tu, hii hii iliyopo inasiginwa, hiyo mpya itakuja na kitu gani iwe ya kipekee na kuzingatiwa kila kitu.

Bora ingekua tunapambania kuheshimiwa kwa mifumo iliyopo na kutafuta ufumbuzi wa kwanini katiba iliyopo na taratibu zinakiukwa.

 

[Mmanu]

Atakamatwa

Sasa Kinga itakuwa na maana gani tena hapo

 

[gallow bird]

Alichaguliwa na nani kuwa Raisi?

Alichaguliwa na mliowakata vidole na kuwapiga kwenye vituo vya kupigia kura

 

[Pulchra Animo]

Lissu kuwaita mashahidi mahakamani akiwemo Rais wa nchi imekaaje kisheria ?

Kuna kizuizi chochote cha Sheria kuzia rais aliye madarakani kuwa shahidi katika kesi iliyo mahakamani?

Shahidi anaweza kutuma mtu kumuwakilisha kwa niaba yake mahakamani?

I don’t see how Lissu gets his way in this. First, this is Tanzania—the system is rigged in favor of the big kahunas:

🔹The President is shielded by absolute constitutional immunity from any court processes or subpoenas while in office.
🔹The VP and PM are protected under the amended Basic Rights and Duties Enforcement Act, which insulates top leaders from individual court actions or personal capacity summonses. Because Tundu Lissu’s treason charges are tied to political events, public speeches, and state actions that took place during their tenure, Mpango and Majaliwa remain legally insulated. The law establishes that an official's actions belong to the State, not the individual. Therefore, even as private citizens, they cannot be personally dragged into court to testify about state operations; any legal inquiry must still be directed at the State through the Attorney General. Maybe if they just choose to testify voluntarily like how former President Mkapa proceeded in Costa Mahalu’s case. The probability of this happening is remote though.

Second, the High Court procedural discretion on relevance will be an extremely hard hurdle to overcome. Under Tanzanian criminal procedure, a court is not obligated to issue a subpoena just because a defendant requests one. The judges maintain strict gatekeeping power and will evaluate the relevance and necessity of the witnesses:

🔹The defense must demonstrate that a witness has direct, material, and firsthand knowledge of the specific facts of the alleged treason.
🔹The court will probably rule that calling the former second- and third-in-command is legally unnecessary, as the defense can obtain any relevant official government records or communications directly from active state repositories via the Attorney General.

 

[Mmanu]

Kwani nini kimkwamishe kwenda mahakamai kutoa ushahidi mpaka wafike kwenye hatua ya kuandika arrest warrant? Uoga au ubabe tu?

Umeandika nisichouliza...
Jibu nilichouliza mkuu

 

[Matrix19]

Rais anakutanishwa vipi na muhaini?yaani huo ni mpango wa kutaka kumalizia nia ovi ya uhaini

Rais yupi huyo?.

Kwa sasa Samuya sio rais ni mwenyekiti wa CCM tu.

Kipindi alipokua rais ilikuaje akakutana na gaidi Ikulu?

Una kumbukumbu hii jinga lao?

 

[Yoda]

I don’t see how Lissu gets his way in this. First, this is Tanzania—the system is rigged in favor of the big kahunas:

🔹The President is shielded by absolute constitutional immunity from any court processes or subpoenas while in office.
🔹The VP and PM are protected under the amended Basic Rights and Duties Enforcement Act, which insulates top leaders from individual court actions or personal capacity summonses. Because Tundu Lissu’s treason charges are tied to political events, public speeches, and state actions that took place during their tenure, Mpango and Majaliwa remain legally insulated. The law establishes that an official's actions belong to the State, not the individual. Therefore, even as private citizens, they cannot be personally dragged into court to testify about state operations; any legal inquiry must still be directed at the State through the Attorney General. Maybe if they just choose to testify voluntarily like how former President Mkapa proceeded in Costa Mahalu’s case. The probability of this happening is remote though.

Second, the High Court procedural discretion on relevance will be an extremely hard hurdle to overcome. Under Tanzanian criminal procedure, a court is not obligated to issue a subpoena just because a defendant requests one. The judges maintain strict gatekeeping power and will evaluate the relevance and necessity of the witnesses:

🔹The defense must demonstrate that a witness has direct, material, and firsthand knowledge of the specific facts of the alleged treason.
🔹The court will probably rule that calling the former second- and third-in-command is legally unnecessary, as the defense can obtain any relevant official government records or communications directly from active state repositories via the Attorney General.

Vipi kuhusu TISS DIG, IGP, CDF ?

 

[gallow bird]

Umewekewa sheria pale juu unataka nini tena?

Maandamano yenu baada ya lissu kukutwa Hana kesi ya kujibu yanapita wapi nipige selfie

 

[Natafuta Ajira]

Umeandika nisichouliza...
Jibu nilichouliza mkuu

Ukijibu swali uliloulizwa ndio unapata jibu lako.