Yaliyojiri Mahakama Kuu Kesi ya Ugaidi inayomkabili Freeman Mbowe na wenzake watatu - Januari 19, 2022


..nimeisoma sheria ya ugaidi kama ulivyoileta kwenye post yako.

..upande wa mashtaka wamedai wanao mashahidi 21, na mpaka sasa hivi mashahidi 10 wamefika mahakamani.

..bado sijasikia ushahidi usio na shaka unaowaunganisha washtakiwa na tuhuma zilizoko mbele yao.

..kungekuwa na ushahidi na mashahidi wenye mashiko, usingesikia hayo maswali ya pgo au mengine unayodai hayana maana.

..mapungufu ya maswali ya upande wa utetezi yanatokana na mapungufu ya ushahidi na mashahidi wa upande wa mashtaka wanaofika mahakamani.
 
🤣🤣🤣 unaongea ugoro mtupu.
Commital Bundle tunayo haina sauti wala bibi yake sauti.

Wakuleta sauti alikua huyu shahidi wa leo na ameshindwa kutoa hizo sauti kwasababu hazina hizo contents za mipango ya uhalifu.

PoliCCM mmebaki uchi kwenye hii kesi ya mchongo.
 
wala- mahakama sasa hivi haitaki kesi za kipuuzi za ushahidi wa kuvizia na usio na maana. Kumbuka kesi hii ilianzia Kisutu- kwenye committal ambao ni mchakato wa kuthibitisha kuwa upande wa mashitaka unao ushahidi unajitosheleza
Mh. Kibatala na wenzake walionyesha na kupewa kila kitu na wakakubali kesi iende ilipo sasa. WENGI WENU HUMU HAMJUI HILO.

Committal proceedings are court hearings held in the Magistrates’ Court to decide whether there is sufficient evidence against an accused person charged with a serious criminal offence to order them to face trial in a higher court.
 

What is a Committal Hearing? (Vic)​

When a person is charged with a serious indictable offence that must be dealt with by the Supreme Court or County Court, the accused must first be ‘committed’ to a higher court by a magistrate. This occurs by way of a proceeding known as a Committal Hearing. At a Committal Hearing, a magistrate considers the prosecution case against the accused and makes an assessment as to whether there is sufficient evidence for a jury to find them guilty. If there is insufficient evidence for a jury to find the accused guilty, the magistrate will dismiss the charge at the Committal Hearing. If there is enough evidence to support a finding of guilt, the magistrate will commit the matter to a higher court, where it will be finalised by way of a guilty plea or a trial.

What is the purpose of a committal hearing?​

Committal hearings exist to prevent serious criminal prosecutions from being initiated indiscriminately. Where the prosecution does not have sufficient evidence to find an accused guilty in a higher court, the accused should not be made to go through the stress and expense of a trial. Committals also serve to expedite the operation of the higher courts and ensure that the time of higher courts is not wasted hearing matters that have no reasonable prospects of a successful prosecution.

A committal hearing can also be used by the defence as an opportunity to test the strength of the case, to cross-examine prosecution witnesses and get an idea of how they are likely to perform at trial. It enables the accused to prepare and present a case and for the issues in contention to be clearly defined.

Legislation​

In Victoria, the process for committal proceedings in governed by the Criminal Procedure Act. Under Section 96 of that Act, a Committal Hearing must be held when an accused is charged with an indictable offence, except where the charge is heard summarily (in the Magistrates Court) or where a direct indictment is filed.

A matter that is proceeding to Committal Hearing will go through a number of administrative court mentions prior to the Committal Hearing. Where the offence is a sexual offence where the victim was a child or a person with a cognitive impairment, the court is required to expedite the matter to Committal Hearing stage and this process should usually be completed within two months (Section 99). The accused must attend all court hearings relating to the committal proceeding unless excused from attending (Section 100).

What happens at a committal hearing?​

How a committal proceeds depends on whether the defence wishes to take the opportunity to test the prosecution case. If the defence wants to test the evidence, the matter proceeds to an oral committal. If the defence concedes that the evidence is sufficient to commit the matter to a higher court, it can be dealt with by way of a hand up committal.

Oral Committals​

At an oral committal hearing, the prosecutor will call each of its witnesses to provide evidence-in-chief. This is usually done by the witness adopting the content of their statement and attesting to its truth and accuracy. The defence then has the opportunity to cross-examine each of the witnesses. However, the defence is not required to put the defence case to the prosecution witnesses and give them the opportunity to comment on it as occurs during a trial.

The defence will often use an oral Committal Hearing as an opportunity to establish facts. The prosecution must lead all its evidence at the Committal Hearing. It is unusual for the defence to call witnesses at the committal stage.

After hearing evidence at committal, a magistrate may commit the charge to a higher court or dismiss the charge. If the magistrate chooses to dismiss the charge, this sends a powerful message to the prosecution that the charge ought not to be proceeded with and marks the end of the criminal proceeding. In rare cases, the prosecution may choose to commence a new proceeding by way of a direct indictment. This means that the charge is re-laid and taken directly to the higher court. The power to file a direct indictment can only be exercised by the Director of Public Prosecutions on the advice of a director’s committee.

Hand up committals​

If the defence concedes that there is sufficient evidence for the charge to be committed to a higher court, it can waive the right to a Committal Hearing and agree to the matter proceeding by way of a hand up committal. This means that the brief of evidence will simply be handed up to the magistrate and the magistrate will commit the matter to a higher court. No witnesses will be called, as parties are in agreement that the matter should be committed and the evidence is not being tested. Hand up committals are common where the accused is planning to plead guilty.

If you would like legal advice about a criminal matter or any other legal matter please contact Go To Court Lawyers.
 
Bwana PGO said:
Huoni aibu kuandika huu upuuzi?? Au hata huwahurumii Wazazi wako ambao waliacha kula wakakupeleka shule?
Click to expand...

What is a Committal Hearing? (Vic)​

When a person is charged with a serious indictable offence that must be dealt with by the Supreme Court or County Court, the accused must first be ‘committed’ to a higher court by a magistrate. This occurs by way of a proceeding known as a Committal Hearing. At a Committal Hearing, a magistrate considers the prosecution case against the accused and makes an assessment as to whether there is sufficient evidence for a jury to find them guilty. If there is insufficient evidence for a jury to find the accused guilty, the magistrate will dismiss the charge at the Committal Hearing. If there is enough evidence to support a finding of guilt, the magistrate will commit the matter to a higher court, where it will be finalised by way of a guilty plea or a trial.

What is the purpose of a committal hearing?​

Committal hearings exist to prevent serious criminal prosecutions from being initiated indiscriminately. Where the prosecution does not have sufficient evidence to find an accused guilty in a higher court, the accused should not be made to go through the stress and expense of a trial. Committals also serve to expedite the operation of the higher courts and ensure that the time of higher courts is not wasted hearing matters that have no reasonable prospects of a successful prosecution.

A committal hearing can also be used by the defence as an opportunity to test the strength of the case, to cross-examine prosecution witnesses and get an idea of how they are likely to perform at trial. It enables the accused to prepare and present a case and for the issues in contention to be clearly defined.

Legislation​

In Victoria, the process for committal proceedings in governed by the Criminal Procedure Act. Under Section 96 of that Act, a Committal Hearing must be held when an accused is charged with an indictable offence, except where the charge is heard summarily (in the Magistrates Court) or where a direct indictment is filed.

A matter that is proceeding to Committal Hearing will go through a number of administrative court mentions prior to the Committal Hearing. Where the offence is a sexual offence where the victim was a child or a person with a cognitive impairment, the court is required to expedite the matter to Committal Hearing stage and this process should usually be completed within two months (Section 99). The accused must attend all court hearings relating to the committal proceeding unless excused from attending (Section 100).

What happens at a committal hearing?​

How a committal proceeds depends on whether the defence wishes to take the opportunity to test the prosecution case. If the defence wants to test the evidence, the matter proceeds to an oral committal. If the defence concedes that the evidence is sufficient to commit the matter to a higher court, it can be dealt with by way of a hand up committal.

Oral Committals​

At an oral committal hearing, the prosecutor will call each of its witnesses to provide evidence-in-chief. This is usually done by the witness adopting the content of their statement and attesting to its truth and accuracy. The defence then has the opportunity to cross-examine each of the witnesses. However, the defence is not required to put the defence case to the prosecution witnesses and give them the opportunity to comment on it as occurs during a trial.

The defence will often use an oral Committal Hearing as an opportunity to establish facts. The prosecution must lead all its evidence at the Committal Hearing. It is unusual for the defence to call witnesses at the committal stage.

After hearing evidence at committal, a magistrate may commit the charge to a higher court or dismiss the charge. If the magistrate chooses to dismiss the charge, this sends a powerful message to the prosecution that the charge ought not to be proceeded with and marks the end of the criminal proceeding. In rare cases, the prosecution may choose to commence a new proceeding by way of a direct indictment. This means that the charge is re-laid and taken directly to the higher court. The power to file a direct indictment can only be exercised by the Director of Public Prosecutions on the advice of a director’s committee.

Hand up committals​

If the defence concedes that there is sufficient evidence for the charge to be committed to a higher court, it can waive the right to a Committal Hearing and agree to the matter proceeding by way of a hand up committal. This means that the brief of evidence will simply be handed up to the magistrate and the magistrate will commit the matter to a higher court. No witnesses will be called, as parties are in agreement that the matter should be committed and the evidence is not being tested. Hand up committals are common where the accused is planning to plead guilty.

If you would like legal advice about a criminal matter or any other legal matter please contact Go To Court Lawyers.
 
Maswali kipuuzi ok

Tuambie wewe huyo polisi alichokichunguza huko maabara baada ya kuzishikilia simu miezi yote
 
Wote tunajua kesi kama hizi Kisutu serikali haishindwi. Ndiyo maana waliona bora ianzie huko. Awamu iliyopita tumeona jinsi gani Kisutu inavyotoa Msjaji kuliko wakati wowote nchi hii.
 
comte said:
Ni sawa lakini kwa akina Mh. Kibatala 90% comedy - ndio maana mnafurahia na kucheka mkisahau nahau ya kiingereza
WHO LAUGHS LAST LAUGHS LONG
Sasa wewe unaamini Inspector wa Polisi hajui kirefu cha DCI
Click to expand...
Kama huyo Inspekta alisema hajui kirefu cha DCI chini ya kiapo atakuwa ame commit perjury. Sasa tumeambiwa kuwa huyo huyo alipoulizwa kama alipata mafunzo ya kudukua alisema hapana, yeye amejifunza "ethical hacking". Tunaambiwa tena kuwa alipoombwa tafsiri ya "ethical hacking" alisema hajui. Kama yote hayo ni kweli, ni yeye ndie aliyekalia tawi kavu maana kusema uongo ukiwa "under oath" ni kosa kubwa sana.

Amandla...

Cc: Nguruvi3 JokaKuu
 
Hata mimi naweza kuamini maneno yako. Tangu wameanza kutoa ushahidi wao hakuna ushahidi wa uhakika.

Kutaja taja maneno meengi bado hakujaonesha ugaidi wa mbowe.
 
comte said:
Huu ushauri ungempa Mh. Kibatala na jopo lake ingesaidia sana
Click to expand...
Wewe na inspector uchwala

Oooh nimesoma IFM

Oooh waisrael walitufundisha mtu wao alitoka Nairobi

Oooh nilisoma IT ila misamiati ya kubatala migumu

Oooh maabara sijakuta chochote kibaya wala sms za kuzungumzia sabaya au kulipua vituo vya mafuta na maandamano
 
comte said:
Ni sawa lakini kwa akina Mh. Kibatala 90% comedy - ndio maana mnafurahia na kucheka mkisahau nahau ya kiingereza
WHO LAUGHS LAST LAUGHS LONG
Sasa wewe unaamini Inspector wa Polisi hajui kirefu cha DCI
Click to expand...
Hatuwezi kupeleka watu kwenye jeshi la polis waliopata Division 1

ila tuwapeleka waliopata division 4 maana kazi yao kukubwa ni kukamata na kuzuia uhalifu-Simbachawene 2021
 

..kwani " komito " inamaanisha watuhumiwa wana hatia?
 
Yah ni kweli hata wakiwarubuni watubumiwa 3 wakili, polisi wameishatoa ushahidi kuwa hakuna jinai ya ugaidi
 
huyu hata commital bundle hajui na Nguvu yake katika Kesi. Nadhani labda wataleta vitu vipya.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…