Kesi ya Uhaini dhidi ya Lissu: Brenda amaliza kutoa ushahidi Mahakamani Septemba 9, 2026

[Hziyech22]

Majaji ni kama wameanza kuandaa watu kisaikolojia, wanasema mashahidi wengi sio lazima wasaidie. Ni kama mashahidi wa mwisho ni hao hao wa cdm, lakini hakuna yoyote kutoka serekalini atakubali kutinga mahakamani, kwanza wote wanajua ni kesi ya kubumba, na wanaogopa kuaibika maana wanajua Lisu atawakaanga vibaya. Na majaji wanajua mahakama haina cha kuwafanya hao wanaoitwa na Lisu mahakamani.

Kuna watu huwa wanahadaa umma kuwa hakuna aliye juu ya sheria, lakini uhalisia unakataa. Na kwenye kesi hii itadhihirika.

Tunatofautiana kwenye mambo mengi ila kwa hapa nauunga mkono hoja

 

[Ngarob]

Tunatofautiana kwenye mambo mengi ila kwa hapa nauunga mkono hoja

Ila kumbuka Mahakama zetu haziko huru kwa kiasi flani... Hata wahusika wa Mahakama wanajua hivyo

Shida Katiba hata ikibadilika Kuna vitu hawata badili ili kuwepo na sehemu Serikali kupumua kwa maovu yake

 

[Hziyech22]

Ila kumbuka Mahakama zetu haziko huru kwa kiasi flani... Hata wahusika wa Mahakama wanajua hivyo

Shida Katiba hata ikibadilika Kuna vitu hawata badili ili kuwepo na sehemu Serikali kupumua kwa maovu yake

Kweli kabisa

 

[binti kiziwi]

Yaani hii kesi Ina maajabu...

Ushahidi wote wa Jamuhuri ulikataliwa angalia list
-Video ya Jambo Tv
-Forensic examination ya Video
-Report ya Election violence ya October 29 ya Mahamba

Sasa hii kesi inaendeshwa kwa maneno tuu... Jamuhuri inatoa maneno pamoja na Mashahidi wao
Mshitakiwa na yeye anajitetea hivyo hivyo

Mbaya zaidi kesi inaendeshwa bila kuona viini vya Uhaini

🔥 🔥 🔥

 

[binti kiziwi]

Aiseeee well done Tata.

Safu imepangwa vizuri ikapangika.

 

[Kalamu]

..Heche ni " character witness " wa Tundu Lissu.

..Ndio maana Heche anaeleza jinsi anavyomfahamu Lissu ni mtu wa aina gani.

..sasa Katuga akianza kumuuliza Heche masuala yasiyohusiana na alichokieleza, kwa mfano amuulize kuhusu tonetone, atakuwa hausaidii upande wa mashtaka.

..Brenda Rupia kazi yake ilikuwa kuieleza mahakama kwamba Lissu hakuita vyombo vya habari virushe hotuba yake. Katuga alitakiwa ambane, na amlazimishe, Brenda kusema kinyume na hivyo.

..Heche anapomuelezea Lissu kwa mwanga mzuri anajenga utetezi kwamba Lissu ni raia mwema, mtetezi wa watu, mpinga mifumo kandamizi, na sio mhaini.

Na kafanya kazi nzuri kabisa juu ya hilo.
Kazi ya Lissu haijawahi kujificha hata siku moja.
Na kumbuka, kazungumzia ya huko Tarime pekee na hajagusia mengine ya kutetea waTanzania sehemu zingine.

Wengi wanaompinga Lissu ni kwa sababu ya mtindo wake wa 'in your face'; hana ujinga ujinga wa kuficha mambo kinafiki; tabia ambayo imewalemaza sana waTanzania wengi; hasa "waswahiliswahili".

 

[Kalamu]

Sasa mtu unasoma maonevu yooote haya aliyoelezea Heche, halafu usiguswe kabisa moyoni mwako!
Eti kwa vile tu unafaidika kutokana na uovu wanaofanyiwa waTanzania wenzako!

 

[Kalamu]

Aiseeee well done Tata.

Safi imepangwa vizuri ikapangika.

Imepangilika vizuri sana.
Na kumbuka, hayo yanahusu maswala ya uchaguzi pekee. Kuna wanaCHADEMA wengi sana walioumizwa na kuuawa, kama akina Mzee Kibao, akina Mdude. Watu kwenda mahakamani kusikiliza kesi tu, wanakutana na vipigo na kwenda kutupwa porini!

Halafu bado kuna watu hawaelewi kabisa maonevu yote haya yanahusu nini?

 

[Eugene Krabs]

Kesi yao hiko hivi; kwa mujibu wa mashtaka (penal code).

Treason/Uhaini (39.2.d)

Soma sheria husika kwenye hiko kipengele (kinasema); article inasema hivi (the intimidation of the executives). Kwa lugha yetu kutishia “kikao cha baraza la mawaziri, kuzuia kufanyika kwa shughuli za bunge na mahakama za Tanzania.

Kwa kutumia kifungu hiko (39.2.d) yaani mawakili wa Lissu na mawakili wa serikali (wote mataahira) if you ask me kwa haya majibizano nayo.

As yet all this has nothing to do necessary with evidence requirement of the case.

Like serious, how stupid are Tanzanians; let alone mashtaka ya Lissu.

No wonder yule mwanasheria magumashi alishinda kesi kadhaa kabla ya kubainika.

It’s just stupid, ukisoma na kufuatilia hii kesi on what the prosecutor or the defendant are arguing about.

Realistically, the whole thing ni uthenge mtupu.

Kesi hiko wapi?

 

[Eugene Krabs]

Shida yetu ni mfumo wa elimu ambao autufunzi kuwa subjective kwenye kuandika analytical matters on topic.

Analytics hapa ni legal exchanges pertaining; penal (39.2.d), does that makes Lissu; Guilty or Not.

That is to say 90% ya michango kwenye hizi mada uwa ni ujinga mtupu not helpful kwa Lissu.

Japo kesi yenyewe ni ujinga mtupu (ujinga ni ujinga tu), someone has to tell you,

 

[Eugene Krabs]

Wanasheria wa Tanzania ni shida supposedly mashitaka ya Lissu ya uhaini has something to na kuzuia uchaguzi.

What the *** has this ‘39(2) (d), got to do with that.

How is that even a case,

Ndio maana wengine tukisoma hizi mada tunapuuzia.

Hapo tena tulikuwa hatujui hata msingi wa kesi,

But then where is the ‘39(2) (d) on this article. Ndio maana ukisoma hii kesi ulikuwa unasikiliza upuuzi wa ushabiki wa Simba na Yanga.

 

[Eugene Krabs]

Hata ukiandika humu kwa kuuliza where is the ‘Mens rea’ and ‘Actus reus’ ya uhaini wa kesi ya Lissu; upati majibu,

Ukisoma muhtasari wa kesi ujinga mtupu.

Ukifuatilia ushahidi (nonsense).

Mashtaka yenyewe salaleh (akili ya kawaida tu, mshtakiwa hana uwezo wa kutekeleza).

Proving (39:2,d) ambayo inasema kutishia kuzuia “kikao cha baraza la mawaziri, kuzuia kufanyika kwa shughuli za bunge na mahakama za Tanzania.

That’s not a mean feat on burden of proof.

Kwa mashtaka hayo serikali inatakiwa ithibitishe Lissu alikuwa na njama zisizo na shaka na mwenye uwezo wa kuzuia kikao/vikao vya baraza la mawaziri kufanyika; Lissu ana uwezo/au mipango iliyothibitika ya kuzuia vikao vya bunge au Lissu ana uwezo wa kuzuia shughuli za mahakama kutekelezeka nchi nzima (salalee).

Hiyo ndio kesi ya Lissu, lazima uwe taahira kuamini kama serikali inakesi. Sio maneno yangu ni penal code walitotumia.

Tumechoka huu ujinga, mnawapa nguvu kwa kuchangia ujinga.

Kuna ugumu gani wa kila mtu kusoma sheria wanayo tutishia nayo au wanayo mtesea Lissu; penal code (39:2,d). Maelezo zaidi ni kuzuia kikao cha baraza la mawaziri, kuzuia kufanyika kwa shughuli za bunge na mahakama za Tanzania.

Maswala ambayo watoto wa mtaani hawawezi fanya kwa wakati mmoja, leave all that has nothing to do with interfering with the election.

Mnaelewa basi hata namna ya kupambana;……

 

[Hziyech22]

Wanasheria wa Tanzania ni shida supposedly mashitaka ya Lissu ya uhaini has something to na kuzuia uchaguzi.

What the *** has this ‘39(2) (d), got to do with that.

How is that even a case,

Ndio maana wengine tukisoma hizi mada tunapuuzia.

Hapo tena tulikuwa hatujui hata msingi wa kesi,

But then where is the ‘39(2) (d) on this article. Ndio maana ukisoma hii kesi ulikuwa unasikiliza upuuzi wa ushabiki wa Simba na Yanga.

Kitu ambacho sielewi ni sababu zipi Lissu kakutwa na kesi ya kujibu ikiwa video waliosubmit ya ushahidi kwa upande wa Serikali imekataliwa na mahakama

 

[Eugene Krabs]

Kitu ambacho sielewi ni sababu zipi Lissu kakutwa na kesi ya kujibu ikiwa video waliosubmit ya ushahidi kwa upande wa Serikali imekataliwa na mahakama

Ushahidi wa video sio hitimisho kiongozi kwenye kesi ya jinai.

Kwenye jinai ushahidi wa video either emphasis una ‘Mens Rea’ au ‘Actus Reus’ followed by supporting evidence.

Hili tuongelee hiyo video; ilikuwa inahusu nini na inalenga nini ‘Mens Rea’ au ‘Actus Reus’.

Inabidi uthibitishe mambo yote hayo kwenye criminal. As yet ukisikiliza hii kesi ya Lissu ni upuuzi mtupu upande wa mashtaka

 

[Tindo]

Tunatofautiana kwenye mambo mengi ila kwa hapa nauunga mkono hoja

Kutofautiana ndio afya ya mijadala.

 

[WALOLA VUNZYA]

Tatizo lako ni heat period inakusumbua. Unbalazimisha watu wote duniani wawaze kama wewe. Fala kabisa

Kuliko wewe usiyejielewa.

 

[Bagamoyo]

Wanasheria wa Tanzania ni shida supposedly mashitaka ya Lissu ya uhaini has something to na kuzuia uchaguzi.

What the *** has this ‘39(2) (d), got to do with that.

How is that even a case,

Ndio maana wengine tukisoma hizi mada tunapuuzia.

Hapo tena tulikuwa hatujui hata msingi wa kesi,

But then where is the ‘39(2) (d) on this article. Ndio maana ukisoma hii kesi ulikuwa unasikiliza upuuzi wa ushabiki wa Simba na Yanga.

WASOMAJI WA KESI INAYOENDELEA * ANGALIZO

Ili kuweza kufuatilia mwenendo wa kesi bila kutekwa na ushabiki, wala sarakasi zinazotokea mahakamani. Sikiliza cross examination ya kesi mojawapo nchini Kenya iliyopo ktk lugha ya Kiswahili
Ili kuweza kufuatilia mwenendo wa kesi bila kutekwa na ushabiki, wala sarakasi zinazotokea mahakamani. Sikiliza cross examination ya kesi mojawapo nchini Kenya iliyopo ktk lugha ya Kiswahili

TOKA MAKTABA
MARCH 2026
Nairobi, Kenya


Afisa Police Akubali Mapengo Muhimu Wakati wa cross-examonation (Uchunguzi Mtambuka) Katika Kesi ya Kushambuliwa ya Boniface Mwangi


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OI3zlLdGBqI
Wakili James Wanjeri alimhoji koplo wa polisi katika kesi inayoendelea inayomhusu mwanaharakati Boniface Mwangi, akifichua kutofautiana kukubwa katika maelezo ya upande wa mashtaka. Afisa huyo, Bw. Yano, aliiambia mahakama kwamba alijibu simu ya dharura saa 3:30 usiku na akafika muda mfupi baadaye, lakini alikiri kwamba hakujitambulisha katika eneo la tukio au kuthibitisha kama tukio hilo la kelele lilikuwa na leseni.

Koplo alikubali zaidi kwamba si kelele zote zinawakilisha kosa la jinai, na alithibitisha kwamba hakuna hatua zilizochukuliwa kupima viwango vya kelele au kuthibitisha uhalali wa mkutano huo. Kuhusu madai mazito zaidi, afisa huyo alikiri kwamba matamshi ya kukera ya mshtakiwa yalikuwa ya jumla na hayakuelekezwa kwa afisa yeyote maalum.

Ushahidi wake kuhusu shambulio hilo linalodaiwa pia uliibua maswali, kwani alidai glasi ilirushwa kwa afisa—lakini glasi hiyo haikutolewa mahakamani.

Alikiri zaidi kwamba licha ya uwepo wa wahudhuriaji 60–70, hakuna mashahidi huru walioitwa, hakuna taarifa zilizorekodiwa kutoka kwa umma, na hakuna kumbukumbu za simu au ingizo la OB lililotolewa kuhusu malalamiko ya awali—mapengo ambayo upande wa utetezi unasema yanadhoofisha kesi ya upande wa mashtaka kwa kiasi kikubwa.

Officer Concedes Key Gaps During Cross-Examination in Boniface Mwangi Assault Trial

Lawyer James Wanjeri mounted a sharp cross-examination of a police corporal in the ongoing case involving activist Boniface Mwangi, exposing major inconsistencies in the prosecution’s account. The officer, Mr. Yano, told the court he responded to a distress call at 9:30 p.m. and arrived shortly after, but admitted he never introduced himself at the scene or verified whether the alleged noisy event was licensed. He further conceded that not all noise amounts to a criminal offence, and confirmed no steps were taken to measure the noise levels or establish the legality of the gathering

On the more serious allegations, the officer acknowledged that the accused’s alleged offensive remarks were general and not directed at any specific officer. His testimony on the alleged assault also raised questions, as he claimed a glass was thrown at an officer—yet the glass was never produced in court. He further admitted that despite the presence of 60–70 attendees, no independent witnesses were called, no statements were recorded from members of the public, and no call logs or OB entry were made regarding the initial complaint—gaps the defence argues significantly weaken the prosecution’s case.

KUJIONGEZA UWEZO WA KUFUATILIA MTIFUANO WA KISHERIA MAHAKAMANI BILA USHABIKI



Tujufunze jinsi ya kufuatilia mwenendo wa kesi kwa kuangalia kwa umakini ushahidi unaotolewa na pia cross examination kama zimejikita katika kuipa uzito chargesheet, au zimeshindwa kujikita ktk mambo ya msingi katika hati ya mashtaka yaani chargesheet. Hapa chini ni elimu na nyenzo za kukuwezesha kufuatilia mwenendo wa mashauri mahakamani ukiwa na fikra huru:


08 October 2025
Nairobi, Kenya
Lawyer John Maina Grills Cop Who Accused Boniface Mwangi of Assaulting Him

View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-_PjSaxUWuk
Lawyer John Maina on Wednesday intensely cross-examined a police officer who accused activist Boniface Mwangi of assaulting him during an April 2025 altercation at Mwangi’s Sema Ukweli offices in Kilimani. The officer claimed Mwangi attacked him while resisting arrest, but the defense disputed this, alleging the officer was intoxicated and attempted to draw his firearm. Maina questioned inconsistencies in the officer’s account and suggested the police were covering up an assault against Mwangi. The case, which has drawn public attention, continues before the Kibera Law Courts.
Source : Court Helicopter

N.B

A chargesheet is the final investigative report filed by law enforcement to show a magistrate that enough concrete evidence exists to start a criminal trial.

Role of Concrete Evidence :

Foundation: The report relies on gathered proof like witness statements, forensic tests, and digital media.

Not Proof of Guilt: The document reflects the officer's opinion based on findings, not a final conviction.

Court Review: A judge evaluates the listed facts to formally frame charges and begin proceedings



View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NccKrdx5VR8

During an intense cross-examination, defence lawyer Shadrack Wambui cast serious doubt on the credibility and competence of cyber-forensic analyst Juma Mwajirani, whose report forms part of the evidence against political commentator Nuru Okanga.Wambui began by asking Mwajirani to state the specific charges Okanga faced. The analyst initially relied on a DCI request letter that cited publication of false information and cyber harassment, but later retracted his answer, admitting he did not actually know the charges.

Lawyer Shadrack Wambui Dismantles Cyber forensic Analyst in Nuru Okanga’s Case


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fGvmL6yviqA

key facts, including whether he knew that Rigathi Gachagua is a former District Officer and former Deputy President details he conceded he did not know. When questioned about his understanding of “inflammatory” content, Mwajirani added that he does not know how to use a gun and that “not everyone shot with a gun dies,” a statement that raised concerns over the basis of his analysis.

On the technical front, the analyst confirmed that TikTok and YouTube accounts can be created without Gmail, acknowledged that the videos in question were posted by Diff Media and Riba News, yet admitted he did not access or identify the owners of those accounts. Of the 22 comments under the videos, he included only three in his report prompting Wambui to question whether the investigation was selectively conducted.

Wambui also highlighted a glaring discrepancy: the DCI request letter used by Mwajirani was dated 2023, even though the case pertains to 2024. The defence argued that such inconsistencies reflect a poorly handled and unreliable investigation.

26 November 2025
Lawyer Abner Mango Discredits Cyber Analyst Over Flawed Report in Nuru Okanga’s Case

View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=F4HV4Bo0L6w
Defence lawyer Abner Mango, together with other lawyers representing Nuru Okanga, challenged the credibility of analyst Juma Mwajirani’s report, arguing it was incomplete and selectively focused on Riba News while ignoring Diff Media, despite both being linked to the disputed video.

Mango questioned why Mwajirani did not investigate who owns the accounts or whether Okanga had any connection to them.

The defence also raised concerns about the handling of Okanga’s seized phone. Mwajirani admitted he never examined the device, checked for malware, or verified whether other users could access it gaps the defence argued undermine the integrity and reliability of his analysis.


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CJNiDPTw66E

cyber forensic expert’s report in the case against political commentator Nuru Okanga was severely weakened today after a blistering cross-examination by defence lawyer Hon. Babu Owino.Cyber and digital forensic analyst Juma Mwajirani came under intense scrutiny as Babu methodically poked holes in both his qualifications and his conclusions. The defence questioned the credibility of Mwajirani’s certification, pointing out that the institution he cited does not issue forensic analyst credentials.Babu further discredited the report by highlighting glaring inconsistencies—among them, the use of a 2023 reference letter to support an investigation conducted in 2024

02 July 2026

Deal Ruthlessly With DCI.Orengo Tough Question to Ruto DCI Officer In Court While Representing Bob

View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZH5rUg3NSGs MORE CROSS EXAMINANATION During cross-examination, defence lawyer Danstan Omari raised questions about missing information in the postmortem documentation and challenged aspects of the pathologist's interpretation of the firearm injuries. However, Dr. Mahin maintained that his role was limited to medical findings and emphasized that he was not a ballistics expert capable of identifying the specific weapon used. The trial continues.
View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWz33klyCYk

Source : Court Helicopter

 

[KERATO MOMBAA]

Unazungumzia mahakama ipi wewe, ile ya Roast Aziz?
Watu mnajiondoa akili vichwani kwa ushabiki tu usiokuwa na msingi.
Pamoja na kujuwa ujuha wako, lakini ngoja nikuulize swali, hata kama huna uwezo wa kulijibu:
Hivi zile 4R za Samia zilizokuwa na R moja ikitamka "REFORM"; hiyo reform ilihusu vitu gani hasa?
Sasa inakuwaje akawa mwoga kiasi kile aliposikia REFORM ya CHADEMA??
Nikukumbushe pia, kwamba Samia hana muda tena. Her time is up!

1. Hzo mahakama zikitoa maamzi yenye tija na tecdema huwa mnakenua meno na hamsemi kuwa ni mbaya, zikitoa maamz tofauti mnakuja na ujuha na wehu wenu hapa wa kupanua vidole badala ya akili

2. Inawezekana reforms ni moja lakini njia ya kuitekeleza ndo zikatofautiana
-tecdema hamuwez ku override the state/country

3. Ni kweli muda wa mh samia unakaribia kumalizika maana bado miaka 4 kumaliza mhula wake
-msijipe umhimu sana mkajiona kama naibu MUNGU wakati hamna chochote.

"FURAHA NI KUBWA KAMA LISU KUNYONGWA

 

[Gellangi]

Majaji ni kama wameanza kuandaa watu kisaikolojia, wanasema mashahidi wengi sio lazima wasaidie. Ni kama mashahidi wa mwisho ni hao hao wa cdm, lakini hakuna yoyote kutoka serekalini atakubali kutinga mahakamani, kwanza wote wanajua ni kesi ya kubumba, na wanaogopa kuaibika maana wanajua Lisu atawakaanga vibaya. Na majaji wanajua mahakama haina cha kuwafanya hao wanaoitwa na Lisu mahakamani.

Kuna watu huwa wanahadaa umma kuwa hakuna aliye juu ya sheria, lakini uhalisia unakataa. Na kwenye kesi hii itadhihirika.

Kiuhalisia watu wote walitakiwa kuwa sawa mbele ya Sheria, Binadamu wote walitakiwa kuwa sawa but kuna waliojimikisha ubinadamu juu ya wengine.The world is not fair.

 

[Kalamu]

3. Ni kweli muda wa mh samia unakaribia kumalizika maana bado miaka 4 kumaliza mhula wake
-msijipe umhimu sana mkajiona kama naibu MUNGU wakati hamna chochote

Atakuwa na bahati sana akipata mwaka.
Tatizo la watu kama wewe ni kuangalia maswala ya nchi katika macho ya kivyama au kidini. Hii akili ndiyo inayoleta matatizo mengi sasa hivi.

Kwa nini maswala yahusu CHADEMA au CCM na yasiwe ya taifa letu kwa pamoja?
Mnataka muambiwe vipi ndipo muelewe?
Hamuwezi kuelewa kwa vile mnafaidika na huo upande wa CCM, ambayo kiuhakika haipo tena kama chama?