Special Thread: Yanayojiri Mgogoro wa Ukraine na Urusi. Nini chanzo na hatma ya mzozo?

Special Thread: Yanayojiri Mgogoro wa Ukraine na Urusi. Nini chanzo na hatma ya mzozo?

Jasmoni Tegga said:
Usitegemee ushindi wa mezani. Kwa taarifa yako, Zelensky analindwa na makomandoo 34 wa US na NATO. Ndiyo maana haogopi kwenda frontline, na wala Russia hamfanyi kitu.

Kwamba wanajeshi wa Ukraine wanatorokea kwa Warusi, hizi ni propaganda za kitoto sana. Crimea soon inarudi. Donbas mmeshindwa kuichukua.
Click to expand...
Zelensky hauwawi sio Kwa sababu analindwa na Askari wa kigeni ama Urusi ameshindwa hapana, Yule anahitajika akiwa hai Kwa kazi ya kusaini nyaraka mhimu...
 
Grand Master said:
The General Staff of the RF Armed Forces publishes a video of the destruction of one Himars installation, which was placed (hidden) somewhere in the industrial area among warehouses.

It has long been rumored on the sidelines that the Russians are chasing Himars installations.
Click to expand...
@T14 Armata

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
wa kupuliza said:
[emoji1][emoji1][emoji1] Wahenga walikua ma-genius sana mkuu Ila hua hatutaki tu kukiri jambo hilo.
Click to expand...
[emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]

Kwendraaa, jina halisi ni "Kubaz", hiyo prefix "ma" tunajiwekea tu sie washahili kumaanisha wingi. So neno makubazi ni la wa waswahili tu.

Anyway we jamaa mtata sana dadeki, mwanzo nimejiuliza umemaanisha nini ile kuangalia capital letters MAKUBAZI, right-left sasa mweeh [emoji119]
 
Mathanzua said:

​

The defence of Ukraine,Finland,
Poland or any other so called NATO member is insane to be frank.

At the NATO summit in Madrid, Finland was invited to join the alliance. What does this mean for Finland?
If Russian President Vladimir Putin breaches the 830-mile Finnish border, the United States will rise to Helsinki’s defense and fight Russia on Finland’s side.

What does Finland’s membership in NATO mean for America?
If Putin makes a military move into Finland, the U.S. will go to war against the world’s largest nation with an arsenal of between 4,500 and 6,000 battlefield and strategic nuclear weapons!

No Cold War president would have dreamed of making such a commitment: to risk the survival of our nation to defend territory of a country thousands of miles away that has never been a U.S. vital interest.
To go to war with the Soviet Union over the preservation of Finnish territory would have been seen as madness during the Cold War.
Recall: Harry Truman refused to use force to break Joseph Stalin’s blockade of Berlin. Dwight Eisenhower refused to send U.S. troops to save the Hungarian freedom fighters being run down by Soviet tanks in Budapest in 1956.
Lyndon B. Johnson did nothing to assist the Czech patriots crushed by Warsaw Pact armies in 1968. When Lech Walesa’s Solidarity was smashed on Moscow’s order in Poland in 1981, Ronald Reagan made brave statements and sent Xerox machines!

While the U.S. issued annual declarations of support during the Cold War for the “captive nations” of Central and Eastern Europe, the liberation of these nations from Soviet control was never deemed so vital to the West as to justify a war with the USSR.

Indeed, in the 40 years of the Cold War, NATO, which had begun in 1949 with 12 member nations, added only four more: Greece, Turkey, Spain and West Germany.
Yet, with the invitation to Sweden and Finland to join as the 31st and 32nd nations to receive an Article 5 war guarantee, NATO will have doubled its membership since what was thought — certainly by the Russians — to have been the end of the Cold War.
All the nations once part of Moscow’s Warsaw Pact — East Germany, Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Romania, Bulgaria — are now members of a U.S.-led NATO — directed against Russia.
Three former republics of the USSR — Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania — are now also members of NATO, a military alliance formed to corral and contain the nation to which they had belonged during the Cold War.
Lithuania, with 2% of Russia’s population, has just declared a partial blockade of goods moving across its territory to Kaliningrad, Russia’s enclave on the Baltic Sea.
To Putin’s protest, Vilnius has reminded Moscow that Lithuania is a member of NATO.

It is a dictum of geostrategic politics that a great power ought never cede to a lesser power the ability to draw it into a great war.
In 1914, the kaiser’s Germany gave its Austrian ally a “blank check” to punish Serbia for its role in the assassination of the Archduke Francis Ferdinand, heir to the Austrian throne. Vienna cashed the kaiser’s check and attacked Serbia, and the Great War of 1914-1918 was on.
In March 1939, Neville Chamberlain issued a war guarantee to Poland. If Germany attacked Poland, Britain would fight on Poland’s side.
Fortified with this war guarantee from the British Empire, the Poles stonewalled Hitler, refusing to talk to Berlin over German claims to the city of Danzig, taken from her at the 1919 Paris Peace Conference.
On Sept. 1, 1939, Hitler attacked and Britain declared war, a war that lasted six years and mortally wounded the British Empire.
And Poland? At Yalta in 1945, Winston Churchill agreed that a Soviet-occupied Poland should remain in Stalin’s custody.
Putin is a Russian nationalist who regards the breakup of the USSR as the greatest calamity of the 20th century, but he is not alone responsible for the wretched relations between our countries.

We Americans have played a leading role in what is shaping up as a Second Cold War, more dangerous than the first.
Over the last quarter-century, after Russia dissolved the Warsaw Pact and let the USSR break apart into 15 nations, we pushed NATO, created to corral and contain Russia, into Central and Eastern Europe.
In 2008, neocons goaded Georgia into attacking South Ossetia, provoking Russian intervention and the rout of the Georgian army.
In 2014, neocons goaded Ukrainians into overthrowing the elected pro-Russian regime in Kyiv. When they succeeded, Putin seized Crimea and Sevastopol, for centuries the home base of Russia’s Black Sea fleet.
In 2022, Moscow asked the U.S. to pledge not to bring Ukraine into NATO. We refused. And Putin attacked. If Russians believe their country has been pushed against a wall by the West, can we blame them?
Americans appear dismissive of dark Russian warnings that rather than accept defeat in Ukraine, the humiliation of their nation, and their encirclement and isolation, they will resort to tactical nuclear weapons.
Is it really wisdom to dismiss these warnings as “saber-rattling”?
Click to expand...
Ntarudi

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
Galip Vrl said:
Mimi naona kama the longer it take, the worst itakuwa upande wa EU na US. Ni kama vile huna pa kula, hulimi wala hujui kupika. Unasusia genge la Mzee baroko, ukitegemea mzee baroko akikosa wateja atarudi kwako mzungumze. Hali inakuwa tofauti, ulichokisusa kwa kibri chako kinaliwa na wengine.

Yale matarajio yako yanayeyuka kila nukta, hapo maana ake kuendelea kukaza ni kujitafutia majanga. Miscalculation zipo kama binadam tunajua hatujakamilika. Ila ku-deny failures ni aina flan hivi ya upumbavu.

Katika calculation za west huwa nahisi kuna kitu kimoja waliki-underestimate. Ule umoja wa uchumi wa BRICS, nahisi walijua wakiubwekea kwa vitisho utagwaya.

Lakini back up waliyompa mrusi hawaikutarajia. Sizungumzii back up ya kumpa silaha, hapa nazungumzia mauzo ya nishati yake. Ki takwimu China pekee anatumia nishati kwa wingi kidogo kuliko bara zima lote la ulaya.

That's
1. US
2. China
3. Europe

Tunafahamu kua nishati ina account over 40% ya mapato ya serikali ya Russia. So kitendo cha India na China kuifakamia nishati ya Mrusi imepelekea vikwazo kua kama maneno ya kwenye kanga.

Hapo kilicho baki labda ni kwenye mifumo ya kipesa. Ila bahati mbaya mifumo ya kifedha ina mbadala mchawi ni rasilimali. Leo ukiona tigo mizinguo, unahamia voda lakini ukikosa msosi utatafuna nyasi [emoji2960].

Lau kama West wangeweza kuyatia mataifa rafiki kwa Russia kibindoni. At least tungejionea maajabu. Lakini nao nani akubali kumsaliti Urusi ilhali wanajua Urusi akidondoshwa wanafata wao? Hawawezi kukubali that's why China, India niseme BRICS na mataifa mengine kwa ujumla wametulia wana enjoy show.

Kutoshiriki kwao kuvikazia hivyo vikwazo vinavifanya vionekane meaningless. Ingawa point kubwa ni kua huezi kuipiga sanctions rich resources country wakati huna mbadala kisha ubaki salama. Never!
Click to expand...
Na BRICS nao wanakuja vzr watu wake excel.
images (4).png
 
Galip Vrl said:
[emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]

Kwendraaa, jina halisi ni "Kubaz", hiyo prefix "ma" tunajiwekea tu sie washahili kumaanisha wingi. So neno makubazi ni la wa waswahili tu.

Anyway we jamaa mtata sana dadeki, mwanzo nimejiuliza umemaanisha nini ile kuangalia capital letters MAKUBAZI, right-left sasa mweeh [emoji119]
Click to expand...
😄😄😄 Basi tuwalaumu waswahili kwa kuongeza hio 'MA' Mkuu 😄😄
 
lee van cliff said:
Ha ha haa.
Ukweli amekera sana
Ila naogopa hiyo Hali ya kuvuliwa nguo isije waogopesha spies wengine.
Click to expand...
Mimi na ma sleeper agents wengine tumeanza kuingiwa na uoga,asije mwisho wa siku akaweka mambo hadharani na kuharibu mpango wangu wa kugombea urais kwa tiketi ya CCM, liwale na liwe 2025 lzm mama atajua hajui
Nalog off Z
 

Former British PM Tony Blair spills the stew:Era of Western dominance ending​

The world will be “at least bi-polar and possibly multi-polar”, according to former UK PM
Era of Western dominance ending – Tony Blair

Britain's former prime minister Tony Blair © AFP / Tolga Akmen
For the first time in modern history the East can be on equal terms with the West, as the global dominance of the US and its allies comes to an end, former British prime minister Tony Blair has said.
Due to the effects of the Covid-19 pandemic and the conflict in Ukraine, “for a large part of the Western population, living standards are stagnating,” Blair noted in his annual lecture at the Ditchley Foundation on Saturday.
“Western politics is in turmoil – more partisan, ugly, unproductive; and fueled by social media,” which affects both domestic and international affairs, Blair said, arguing that Russia’s military operation in Ukraine “should become a pivot point reviving our [Western] sense of mission.”
However, according to the 69-year-old, who led the UK government from 1997 to 2007, “the biggest geopolitical change of this century will come from China not Russia.”
“We are coming to the end of Western political and economic dominance. The world is going to be at least bi-polar and possibly multi-polar,” he predicted.

READ MORE
Previous world order won't return – Putin
China, which is “already the world’s second superpower,” will compete with the West “not just for power but against our system, our way of governing and living,” the Labour politician warned. Beijing “will not be alone. It will have allies. Russia now for sure. Possibly Iran.”
“It is the first time in modern history that the East can be on equal terms with the West,” he added.
The former premier said the events in Ukraine have made it clear the West “cannot rely on the Chinese leadership to behave in the way we would consider rational. Don't misunderstand me. I am not saying in the near term that China would attempt to take [the self-governed island of] Taiwan by force. But we can't base our policy on the certainty that it wouldn't.”
READ MORE: China and Russia want to create G7 alternative – media
In order to stay relevant in the new environment, the West needs to develop a common strategy, “pursued with coordination, commitment and competence,” with higher defense spending to “maintain military superiority” while expanding so-called “soft power” by building ties with developing countries, Blair concluded.
 
Mathanzua said:

This is what the lunatic and crazy Western governments are telling their citizens who are obviously suffering from Mass Formation Psychosis.​

EU asks citizens to ‘be patient’ as anti-Russian sanctions bite


EU foreign policy head Josep Borrell has called on Europeans to show “strategic patience” while months worth of supposedly devastating sanctions against Russia take effect.This is a stupid comment considering the fact that the sanctions the US and the EU have imposed on Russia are not hurting Russia but Europe instead. Infact they are a windfall for Russia!
“The sanctions imposed by the EU and like-minded partners are already hitting Vladimir Putin and his associates hard,” Borrell hipocritically declared in a blog post on Sunday,stupidly insisting “their impact on the Russian economy will only increase.” He says all this while EU citizens are suffering from record inflation,high food,gas and fuel prices and much more.
He continued “We need strategic patience until Russia stops its aggression and Ukraine is able to regain its full sovereignty,”a statement which is far fetched.
READ MORE: What’s in the EU’s 6th package of anti-Russian sanctions?
He stupidly continues to say, "the EU’s anti-Russian sanctions will crush Moscow any minute now!"

The EU has passed six packages of punishing sanctions targeting Moscow, yet the bloc itself has stumbled into an increasingly dire gas shortage and a currency whose value recently dipped below that of the US dollar for the first time in 20 years.
One of the most recent sanctions seeks to cut 90% of Europe’s oil purchases from Russia by the end of 2022. Borrell acknowledged that “this rapid detoxification from Russian energy involves significant costs or a number of countries and sectors that we will have to face.” However, he insisted it was a small price to pay, warning that a Russian victory would amount to the destruction of Western democracy itself, as well as the “rules-based international order.”
The energy-related sanctions in the latest package make a notable exception for member states with “no viable alternative options” for energy, a loophole presumably met for Hungary, which has staunchly opposed an oil embargo on the grounds that it would harm the Hungarian people much more than it would inconvenience the Russians.
Borrell insisted earlier this month that Europe does not want war with Russia, arguing the sanctions are key to countering Moscow’s “aggression” and declaring the financial restrictions were already having an effect.
Along with the US, Europe has poured billions of dollars’ worth of weapons and financial aid into Ukraine,only to be destroyed by Russia,since Russia’s military operation began in February. Borrell has promised not to allow Kiev to run out of weapons,a step which will only further destroy the EU economy in the long run.
READ MORE: EU won’t let Ukraine run out of weapons – Borrell
Russia sent troops into Ukraine on February 24, citing Kiev’s failure to implement the Minsk agreements, designed to give the regions of Donetsk and Lugansk special status within the Ukrainian state. The protocols, brokered by Germany and France, were first signed in 2014. Former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko has since admitted that Kiev’s main goal was to use the ceasefire to buy time and “create powerful armed forces.”
In February 2022, the Kremlin recognized the Donbass republics as independent states and demanded that Ukraine officially declare itself a neutral country that will never join any Western military bloc. Kiev insists the Russian offensive was completely unprovoked.
Click to expand...
Ntarudi

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
Galip Vrl said:
Mimi naona kama the longer it take, the worst itakuwa upande wa EU na US. Ni kama vile huna pa kula, hulimi wala hujui kupika. Unasusia genge la Mzee baroko, ukitegemea mzee baroko akikosa wateja atarudi kwako mzungumze. Hali inakuwa tofauti, ulichokisusa kwa kibri chako kinaliwa na wengine.

Yale matarajio yako yanayeyuka kila nukta, hapo maana ake kuendelea kukaza ni kujitafutia majanga. Miscalculation zipo kama binadam tunajua hatujakamilika. Ila ku-deny failures ni aina flan hivi ya upumbavu.

Katika calculation za west huwa nahisi kuna kitu kimoja waliki-underestimate. Ule umoja wa uchumi wa BRICS, nahisi walijua wakiubwekea kwa vitisho utagwaya.

Lakini back up waliyompa mrusi hawaikutarajia. Sizungumzii back up ya kumpa silaha, hapa nazungumzia mauzo ya nishati yake. Ki takwimu China pekee anatumia nishati kwa wingi kidogo kuliko bara zima lote la ulaya.

That's
1. US
2. China
3. Europe

Tunafahamu kua nishati ina account over 40% ya mapato ya serikali ya Russia. So kitendo cha India na China kuifakamia nishati ya Mrusi imepelekea vikwazo kua kama maneno ya kwenye kanga.

Hapo kilicho baki labda ni kwenye mifumo ya kipesa. Ila bahati mbaya mifumo ya kifedha ina mbadala mchawi ni rasilimali. Leo ukiona tigo mizinguo, unahamia voda lakini ukikosa msosi utatafuna nyasi [emoji2960].

Lau kama West wangeweza kuyatia mataifa rafiki kwa Russia kibindoni. At least tungejionea maajabu. Lakini nao nani akubali kumsaliti Urusi ilhali wanajua Urusi akidondoshwa wanafata wao? Hawawezi kukubali that's why China, India niseme BRICS na mataifa mengine kwa ujumla wametulia wana enjoy show.

Kutoshiriki kwao kuvikazia hivyo vikwazo vinavifanya vionekane meaningless. Ingawa point kubwa ni kua huezi kuipiga sanctions rich resources country wakati huna mbadala kisha ubaki salama. Never!
Click to expand...

Ususe kula ugali utegemee na sisi wengine tususe? Haiwezekani ukisusa uatalala njaaa, njaa ikiuma utaamka usiku kula hata ukoko ndo wanachofanya west.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Our Community

Coming Soon

Regional Communities

Coming Soon
Back
Top Bottom
Menu
Forums
New posts
Log in
Register