Missile of the Nation
JF-Expert Member
- May 24, 2018
- 15,101
- 56,054
- Thread starter
- #121
I'm trying to make the same argument on appointments that always seem to tilt in favour of one group (based on religion affiliation), I am trying to show them that whenever appointments are made in bulk, there has never been a single time when people from religion X are more in numbers than people of religion Y.Justice must not only be done, it must also appear to be done.
Caesars wife must be above suspicion.
The appearance of nepotism alone is problematic.
Tanzania has no shortqge of qualified people to the extent of overrepresenting one family.
Tanzania is a republic, not a kingdom.
So my argument is, is it true that there are no enough people from religion X who have all qualifications required as compared to people of religion Y?
And why there has always been an observable pattern where people of religion X are always in a margin of about (20-25)% when a bulk appointment is done? —This has been true in the DASes, RASes, RCs, DCc, Ambassadors, DEDs, Ministers, Executive Secretaries and so on!
The argument that the number of people of religion X having qualifications is low to warrant a fair representation is futile because, There are thousands of their graduates coming out f universitiea every year.
When Nyerere was retiring in 1985 he said, he has successfully decreased the gap of education imbalance between Muslims and Christians, and he said that when he makes appointments, he no longer worry about having few people from Muslims conmunity, Now the question is, if by 1985 the education gap has been decreased significantly, then why on earth in 2021 we still see a large gap on appointments between Muslims and Christians where by the latter taking a lionshare of those? —Something is smelling fishy here!