Ukristo ni kutukuza utamaduni wa watu weupe, tujitafakari sana


The Gospel of Matthew:


"The unknown author, whom we shall continue to call Matthew for the sake of convenience, drew no only up the Gospel according to Mark but upon a large body of material (principally, sayings of Jesus) not found in Mk that corresponds, sometimes exactly, to material found also in the Gospel according to Luke. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1008)"


"As for the place where the gospel was composed, a plausible suggestion is that it was Antioch, the capital of the Roman province of Syria. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1009)"


So we clearly see, both the author or authors and the place of composition of the "Gospel of Matthew" are unknown.
 

Kiungopunda


Soma biblia zilivyoandika


The Gospel of Mark:


This gospel is the oldest and is supposedly the most original one in the New Testament.



"Although the book is anonymous, apart from the ancient heading "According to Mark" in manuscripts, it has traditionally been assigned to John Mark, in whose mother's house (at Jerusalem) Christians assembled. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1064)"


"Although there is no direct internal evidence of authorship, it was the unanimous testimony of the early church that this Gospel was written by John Mark. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1488)"


  • We certainly do not know whether Mark was the author or not! The quote clearly states "no direct internal evidence of authorship". Also, the so-called unanimous testimony of the early church:

    - Does not prove that the author was Mark.

    - Nor does it prove that other people did not alter and modify the book, especially when the book was written at least 40-50 years after Christ. We don't even know if Mark even wrote the book.


"Traditionally, the gospel is said to have been written shortly before A.D. 70 in Rome, at a time of impending persecution and when destruction loomed over Jerusalem. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1064)"





"Serious doubts exists as to whether these verses belong to the Gospel of Mark. They are absent from important early manuscripts and display certain peculiarities of vocabulary, style and theological content that are unlike the rest of Mark. His Gospel probably ended at 16:8, or its original ending has been lost. (From the NIV Bible Foot Notes [1], page 1528)"


"This verse, which reads, "But if you do not forgive, neither will your heavenly Father forgive your transgressions," is omitted in the best manuscripts. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1081)"


"This passage, termed the Longer Ending to the Marcan gospel by comparison with a much briefer conclusion found in some less important manuscripts, has traditionally been accepted as a canonical part of the gospel and was defined as such by the Council of Trent. Early citations of it by the Fathers indicate that it was composed by the second century, although vocabulary and style indicate that it was written by someone other than Mark. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1088)"


So, in reality, we don't really know whether Mark was the sole author of this Gospel or not, nor do we know when and where the "gospel" was even written. And since The New Testament wasn't even documented on paper until 150-300 years (depending on what Christian you talk to) after Jesus, then how are we to know for sure that the current "Gospel of Mark" wasn't written by some pro of Mark?



A new captured image of this book's corruption:








(http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mark 16:9-20;&version=31;)


The above text reads: "The most reliable early manuscript and other ancient witnesses do not have Mark 16:9-20."


Now my concern to this corruption and 'answer-the-problem-away' statement is that what are those so-called "reliable early manuscript(s)" and who are the "ancient witnesses"?


According to the early Christians' manuscripts, Jesus never got crucified, and trinity is a lie. The so-called "gospel of Mark", along with all of the "gospels" of the NT, were written by third-party narration, as clearly demonstrated and shown in the sections below. People wrote on the tongue of Jesus' Disciples those books. They are neither original nor are the Pure Word of GOD Almighty.





If the "gospel of Mark" was indeed Divine and from GOD Almighty, then we wouldn't have this corruption, that they're admitting above, in it.





I hope you see the real danger in making these assumptions when you are willing to DIE for the fact that such Gospel is the actual True Word of GOD Almighty!


Further regarding this Gospel, we read the following commentary about Mark 16:9-20:


"Serious doubts exists as to whether these verses belong to the Gospel of Mark. They are absent from important early manuscripts and display certain peculiarities of vocabulary, style and theological content that are unlike the rest of Mark. His Gospel probably ended at 16:8, or its original ending has been lost. (From the NIV Bible Foot Notes [1], page 1528)"


This quote raises a very serious issue here. First of all, as we've seen above in the first quote, we have no evidence that proves that John Mark was the sole author of this so called "Gospel". Second of all, we see that this Gospel has some serious problems/suspicions in it. The issue of Mark 16:9-20 is a scary one, because many Christian cults today use poisonous snakes in their worship and end up dying.


Removing Mark 16:9-20 is quite appreciated by me personally (to be quite honest with you), because it prevents people from dying from snake bites. But however, the serious issue of man's corruption of the Bible remains.


We can be absolutely certain now that the above quotes prove without a doubt that the Bible is doubtful. The quote "or its original ending has been lost" proves that what we call today "Gospels" were not written by their original authors such as Mark, John, Matthew, etc... It proves that the Gospel had been tampered with by man. Let alone considering it as the True Living Words of GOD Almighty.


If John Mark wasn't the one who wrote Mark 16:9-20, then who did? And how can you prove the ownership of the other person? Let alone proving that it was GOD Almighty's Revelation. And as we saw in the first quote above, we don't even know that John Mark was indeed the one who wrote the so called "Gospel of Mark".


To say the least in our case here, we now have enough evidence to discard the entire Gospel of Mark from the Bible, because you can't take bits and pieces of it and say some of it belongs to him and some of it doesn't! Let alone considering the entire corrupted Gospel as the True Living Word of GOD Almighty, which is a complete blasphemy.
 
Mwalim

Mbona huyo Padri jina halijatajwa naomba uniletee Jina nduhu yangu. Na hata kama ni kweli mimi ninaangalia Maslahi sio dinni. Nimeshasema huko nyuma kama wakatoliki wangeishia kujenga makanisa tu. Kama waaarabu walivyoishia kujenga misikiti tu.Ningeukana Ukristu na Roho Mtakatifu. Unajua maana ya kumkana Roho mtakatifu ? Nasubiri Majibu ndugu yangu, Bado nipo na wewe nataka uamke katika usingizi uliolala.

Ndugu naona bado unakwepa swali naomba unitajie taaasisi iliyoanzishwa na kuendeshwa na waarabu. Narudia tena kwa mara ya thelathini na saba : "Mwarabu kamwe hawezi kuwasaidia waafrika. Msaada pekee kwa waafrika ni msikiti. Akijitahidi sana ataweka kisima kwa ajili ya maji ya kutawadhia." Bado nipo na wewe nasubiri majibu Sheikh wangu.
 
Unasema mimi najipakazia Uzungu mbona ninasali kwa kiswahili na kuna watanzania wanasali kwa kimbulu na kinyakyusa. Maana kuna Biblia zimetafsiriwa katika Lugha hizo. Lakini Quran kuisoma inabidi ujue Kiarabu. Mimi na wewe nani anajipakazia tamaduni zisio zake ndugu yangu naomba unijibu ? Maana kuna dini zinakulazimu uende Uatrabuni ili utimize nguzo za dini.Lakini kuna dini wala hazijali uende wapi Mungu yupo kokote. Maana wewe si umekazania dini ndio maana ninakuambia ukweli nisaidie ndugu yangu. Mimi na wewe nani anajipakazia kitu kisicho na Uhalisia ? Mimi naweka dini pembeni Uislamu na Ukristu upi uasaidia jamii ya watanzania ukianzia Ajira, Afya na elimu ? Amka ndugu yangu ujamaa ushaisha ztoka miaka ya tisini

Ndugu naona bado unakwepa swali naomba unitajie taaasisi iliyoanzishwa na kuendeshwa na waarabu. Narudia tena kwa mara ya thelathini na nane : "Mwarabu kamwe hawezi kuwasaidia waafrika. Msaada pekee kwa waafrika ni msikiti. Akijitahidi sana ataweka kisima kwa ajili ya maji ya kutawadhia." Bado nipo na wewe nasubiri majibu Sheikh wangu.
 
🚮
 

Unasema unasali kwa kiswahili hiyo sala ni sala gani na unamfuata nani ??? Nani alikuambia usali kwa kiswahili au ni huyo mzungu wa Roma ??

Kwani Mungu ni nani ???

Mbona umechanganyikiwa mara naweka dini pembeni mara nasali kwa kiswahili , Usichanganyikiwe tutafika tu
 

Of course System, serikali ni yenu yenyewe ndio maana mkamficha huyo Padri otherwise angalishatajwa zamani. Tena gazeti limeandika jina limehifadhiwa . Kwanini walihifadhi ?? wasitaje

Mbona hao waRoma hawajawamwagia pesa wamebakia kuingia kwenye biashara haramu za ujangiri??

Kwani huelewi kuna watu walifungwa kwa kusema Yesu si Mungu ??? kwa nini wakamatwe ?? na nchi haina dini??

Unasema wewe hujali dini inakuwaje unasali ??
 
Mtu mweupe na mwarabu nani bora. Maana kuna mmoja anaishia kujenga misikiti akijitahidi ataweka kisima cha maji kwa ajili ya kutawadha. Lakini kuna mwingine amejenga mashule, mahospitali na vyuo nchini kwetu. Nasubiri Jibu ndugu yangu ?
Mashule na vyuo mnasoma aina gani ya elimu?
 
Mimi sijachanganyikiwa nduguyangu diniyako inakulazimu kuhiji uarabuni na inakulazimu kusali kwa kiarabu. Mimi ninasali kwa kiswahili, naomba unijibu kati ya mimi na wewe nani anajikataa alikotoka na utamaduni wake. Bado nipo na wewe nataka uamke ndugu yangu.

Ndugu naona bado unakwepa swali naomba unitajie taaasisi iliyoanzishwa na kuendeshwa na waarabu. Narudia tena kwa mara ya thelathini na tisa : "Mwarabu kamwe hawezi kuwasaidia waafrika. Msaada pekee kwa waafrika ni msikiti. Akijitahidi sana ataweka kisima kwa ajili ya maji ya kutawadhia." Bado nipo na wewe nasubiri majibu Sheikh wangu.
 
Tunafanya Biashara haramu ya Ujangili kivipi ?Unasema mapadre hawalipwi. Mbona kuna Sheikh juzi ameomba serikali iwalipe. Ushasikia Mchungaji, Padre au Askofu akiiiomba serikali iwalipe ? Hata mafundi wa ujenzi wakipata tenda misikitini hawaendi maana mnazingua kuwalipa. Unajisikiajie chimbuko la dini yenu kuna mafuta lakini mnakosa hata hela ya kuwalipa mafundi ujenzi. Zunguka mitaani Masheikh wanatembelea dala dala kweli ? Sheikh anakuja kwenye kisomo na boda boda halafu kabisa unasema una dini ? Amka ndugu yangu naona bado umelala tupo mwaka 2024.Yaani Jindi kanisa katoliki lilivypkuwa na taasisi na miradi utasema Vatican kuna visima vya mafuta.

Ndugu naona bado unakwepa swali naomba unitajie taaasisi iliyoanzishwa na kuendeshwa na waarabu. Narudia tena kwa mara ya Arobaini : "Mwarabu kamwe hawezi kuwasaidia waafrika. Msaada pekee kwa waafrika ni msikiti. Akijitahidi sana ataweka kisima kwa ajili ya maji ya kutawadhia." Bado nipo na wewe nasubiri majibu Sheikh wangu.
 
Hata historia yake hujui.. Ukristo uliingia Ethiopia kabla hata ya Uingereza Ufaransa Ureno Ubelgiji na Ujerumani... ambao ndio kwa kiasi kubwa wametawala africa..
Mzungu zamani alikuwa mpagani tu, na yeye Ukristo alipelekewa tu sema akautumia vizuri
 
Sawa, Sasa jibu swali

Unasema unasali kwa kiswahili hiyo sala ni sala gani na unamfuata nani ??? Nani alikuambia usali kwa kiswahili au ni huyo mzungu wa Roma ??

Kwani Mungu ni nani ??? Huyo mungu wako wapi Alikuambia usali kwa kiswahili ?
 
Mzungu ni bora mara Elf 1000 kuliko Murabu
Muarabu hana msaada wowote kwene hii dunia…..zaidi ya kusambaza chuki,ujinga na umasikini

Hata hii platform ni technologia ya Mzungu
 
Yaani ile habari hukusoma? Na mwengone juzi tu kakamatwa akiuza viungo vya Albino. Hivi unaweza kuniambia usheikh umetajwa wapi kuwa ni cheo katika uislamu? Maana naona umekaza shingo Kama vile ni cheo Kama cha Padri au askofu?
 
Nadhani karibu hizo dini zote zilizopo huziendea jamii na utamaduni wa dini hizo, ikianzia na dini ya kale zaidi ya Wahindu, utaelewa hili kama ukijua vizuri maana ya utamaduni.

Dini karibu zote hazitukuzi tamaduni za mtu mweusi, kwa kuwa tamaduni ni namna ya kuishi na hizi dini pia ni namna ya kuishi, kwani zinahusu mavazi, mazishi na maziko na hata ndoa.

Kupokea dini yoyote na kuiishi ni sehemu ya kupokea utamaduni mpya wa maisha, ndiyo maana watu wa dini fulani mtaendana hata kwa nchi tofauti.

Ova
 
Yaani ile habari hukusoma? Na mwengone juzi tu kakamatwa akiuza viungo vya Albino. Hivi unaweza kuniambia usheikh umetajwa wapi kuwa ni cheo katika uislamu? Maana naona umekaza shingo Kama vile ni cheo Kama cha Padri au askofu?
Narudia tena mbona masheikh wenu wanaomba serikali iwalipe ? Haujiulizi kama dini yenu ina matatizo ? Basi unasema kuwa Sheikh sio cheyo kuna umuhimu gani kusikiliza mawaidha ya Sheikh Jumaa kama U-Sheikh sio cheo ? Amka ndugu yangu mimi nimerudia swali tena na tena hakuna taasisi iliyoanzishwa na inaendeshwa na Mwarabu. Naomba nikuulize swali Vatican na Saudi Arabia nani ana hela.Maana Saudia ana hela ya mafuta na hela ya waislamu wanaohiji. Lakini sioni Taasisi walizoanzisha hapa Tanzania ? Au labda mimi ni mjinga naomba unipe maarifa ndugu yangu.

Ndugu naona bado unakwepa swali naomba unitajie taaasisi iliyoanzishwa na kuendeshwa na waarabu. Narudia tena kwa mara ya Arobaini na moja : "Mwarabu kamwe hawezi kuwasaidia waafrika. Msaada pekee kwa waafrika ni msikiti. Akijitahidi sana ataweka kisima kwa ajili ya maji ya kutawadhia." Bado nipo na wewe nasubiri majibu Sheikh wangu.
 
Na Uislamu ni kutukuza utamaduni wa nani?
 
Mtu mweupe na mwarabu nani bora. Maana kuna mmoja anaishia kujenga misikiti akijitahidi ataweka kisima cha maji kwa ajili ya kutawadha. Lakini kuna mwingine amejenga mashule, mahospitali na vyuo nchini kwetu. Nasubiri Jibu ndugu yangu ?
Hakuna Bora,hao wote ni washenzi tuu
 
Hata huo uislam ni kutukuza tamaduni za waarabu tu mi naona turudi kwenye asili yetu ya MIZIMU TU
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…