Mtukutu wa Nyaigela
JF-Expert Member
- Sep 4, 2018
- 8,013
- 14,263
Mungu wako umemuumba au umempataje. hebu tujuze kuhusu huyo mungu wako
Mungu wako umemuumba au umempataje. hebu tujuze kuhusu huyo mungu wakobinafsi naamini MUNGU wangu mimi kaka mimi na hizo dini sjui Islamic au Christian sijui nini nishatoka huko sababu MUNGU wa hizo dini anaubaguzi kabisa.
Lakini MUNGU wangu mimi hana ubaguzi.
staki kukujibu maswali ya kuumiza kichwa saana...sababu bado najifuza hasa pia kupitia nondo zako.
Vipi kwanza ushalipa KODI ya nyumba mkuu?
Fumba macho kwa dakika 20.Mungu wako umemuumba au umempataje. hebu tujuze kuhusu huyo mungu wako
Hao wanakataa uwepo wa Mungu wakupe maelezo namna ulimwengu ulivyoumbwaKuna jambo limenisukuma sana kuandika huu Uzi.
Mambo ambayo yanaendelea kuhusu uwepo wa Mungu.
Kuna baadhi ya watu wa amini hakuna mungu nk.
Ni ingie kwenye point.
Uwepo wa mungu una dhihirika kwa alama zake na viumbe vyake.
Hebu tutafakari kama hakuna mungu nani alieumba bahari, jua, mbingu, binadamu, wanyama hivi vitu vimetokea vipi kama hakuna alieviimba.
Leo hii hata ukimchukuwa mtoto mdogo wa miaka mitatu ukamuuliza nani kaumba mbingu atakujibu mungu.
Vipi mtu mzima mwenye akili timamu unashindwa kutambua hilo.
Yapo mambo mengi sana yana thibitisha uwepo wa mungu naweza kesha kuelezea kiufupi, Tufahamu mungu yupo na yeye ndo ametuumba sisi ili tumuabudu yeye tu.
Uthibitisho ni huu.Duniani kuna viumbe chungu mzima na kila kiumbe kuanzia virus mpaka papa kila kimoja kina DNA yake ya kipekee.Tupe uzibitisho Kwamba hivi vitu vimeumbwa na mungu,
Mbona haendelei na huumbaji?
Complexity haiwezi kutokea by chance. Complexity inaamaanisha kuna creator who is a master plannerYeah.
Ukisema complexity si lazima iwe imeumbwa by design, unasema Mungu si lazima awepo. Hii habari ya "Mungu ni lazima awepo kwa sababu yeye ndiye muumba wa kwanza" inatoweka.
Ukisema kwamba, complexity ni lazima iwe imeumbwa by design, kimsingi unasema Mungu hayupo, kwa sababu Mungu naye ni complexity, na ikiwa complexity inahitaji muumbaji, Mungu naye atahitaji muumba, na muumba wake atahitaji muumba, bila mwisho.
Either way, Mungu halazimiki kuwepo au hayupo kabisa.
Sijui watu wangapi wanaelewa hizi hoja.
Kwa huvyo kwa vile swala analiwa na Simba basi Mungu hayupo? Ndio hoja yajo hii ??Just imagine, Watoto wasio na hatia yeyote ile wala ufahamu wowote ule wanakufa kwa vita na majanga ya asili mbalimbali yaliyopo duniani.
Halafu una ambiwa, Mungu ni mwema sana mwenye huruma na upendo na huokoa watu kwenye shida na vita.
Maelfu ya watoto wamekufa huko Gaza lakini Mungu anaye daiwa ni mwema, mwenye huruma na upendo AMESHINDWA KUWA OKOA watoto hawa...
Yani kama huyo Mungu yupo ni mkatili sana na Muuaji mkubwa sana.
Murderer God. View attachment 2835493
Atheists mkifa mnazikwaje? Mnaona vipi?Kwa hiyo sisi Atheists ndio tuna sababisha vita?
Hivi wewe unafikiri sawasawa kweli ?
Vita vingi vimepiganwa na vinapiganwa kwa kigezo eti kueneza neno la Mungu?
Angalia magaidi ya Islamic state,
Al-Qeida, Al-shabaab, Boko Haram n.k yakipigana vita wanapayuka payuka Allah Akbar! Allah Akbar! Allah Akbar! Kwa kigezo kwamba wana mpigania Mungu (Allah) kupata thawabu....
Hivi huyo Mungu neno lake lina enezwa kwa vita?
Halafu ndio mnadai Mungu huyo ni mwema mwenye upendo na huruma?
Wanao ongoza kusababisha maafa ni watu wanao mwamini huyo Mungu.
Kibwetere wa Uganda alichoma waumini wake wakamwone huyo Mungu, Paul Makenzie yule mchungaji wa Kenya kaua maelfu ya watu msituni shakahola kwa kuwashindisha njaa waumini wapumbavu wafia dini wakamwone Yesu...!!!!
Hivi kwa mifano hiyo tu, kati ya sisi Atheists na nyie wafia dini na Mungu wenu huyo nani ana ongoza kusababisha maafa makubwa?
Leta uthibitisho wowote ule au takwimu zikionyesha kwamba tusio mwamini Mungu tumeleta maafa.
Skia wewe, Atheists ni watu peace sana, free thinkers na tuna uwezo mkubwa sana wa kufikiri.
Naomba kufahamishwa how the universe was created kwa mujibu wa atheists? Na wanyama na viumbe?Mungu alilazimika kuumba ulimwengu ambao evil inawezekana?
Au hakulazimika, aliumba ulimwengu wenye kuweza kuwa na evil kwa kupemda tu?
Kama alilazimika, je, ni kweli ana uwezo wote?
Kama hakulazimika, je, ni kweli ana upendo wote?
Unaona contradiction hapa? Unaelewa kuwa Mungu mwenye uwezo wote, ujuzi wote na upendo wote kuwapo pamoja na ulimwengu unaoruhusu mabaya ni contradiction, that the two are mutually exclusive?
Unajuaje hilo?Complexity haiwezi kutokea by chance. Complexity inaamaanisha kuna creator who is a master planner
Atheism has nothing to do with defining hiw the universe was created.Naomba kufahamishwa how the universe was created kwa mujibu wa atheists? Na wanyama na viumbe?
You need to have an alternative explanation of the origin of life so that we can understand you.Atheism has nothing to do with defining hiw the universe was created.
Atgeism has everything to do with the notion tgat God does not exist.
I don't have to know how the universe was created to be an atheist.
I just need to know that God does not exist.
You need to have an alternative explanation of the origin of life so that we can understand you.
Simplly being adamant that God does without giving reasons does not make sense.
Your argument is a logical non sequitur fallacy.
I am telling you, in base 10 nath, the square root of 2 cannot be 10. It nust be smaller than 2. It cannot be 10, because 10 is larger than 2.
You are asking me what is tge square root if 2. I say I don't know. I only know tgat 10 is not the square root if 2.
I don't need to know the square root if 2 to know tgat 10 is not tge square root if 2.
But you are still insisting I must shiw you what is tge square root of 2.
But I never claimed to know the square root of 2, only that it is not 10.
Your objection is a logical fallacy, logical non sequitur.
I have given reasons why I say God does not exist.
I mentioned that the all knowing, all capable and all loving God can be proved to not exist, by proof by contradiction, using Epicurean Paradox and the problem of evil.
I have eliminated that as the origin of life.
I can say this is a wrong answer without knowing the right answer.
If I know the square root if 2 must be smaller than 2, I can know that 10 is not tge square root if 2 without knowing what is the square root of 2.
Why are you forcing me to know the right answer to be able to say another answer is the wrong answer?
Your argument is a logical non sequitur fallacy.
I am telling you, in base 10 nath, the square root of 2 cannot be 10. It nust be smaller than 2. It cannot be 10, because 10 is larger than 2.
You are asking me what is tge square root if 2. I say I don't know. I only know tgat 10 is not the square root if 2.
I don't need to know the square root if 2 to know tgat 10 is not tge square root if 2.
But you are still insisting I must shiw you what is tge square root of 2.
But I never claimed to know the square root of 2, only that it is not 10.
Your objection is a logical fallacy, logical non sequitur.
I have given reasons why I say God does not exist.
I mentioned that the all knowing, all capable and all loving God can be proved to not exist, by proof by contradiction, using Epicurean Paradox and the problem of evil.
I have eliminated that as the origin of life.
I can say this is a wrong answer without knowing the right answer.
If I know the square root if 2 must be smaller than 2, I can know that 10 is not tge square root if 2 without knowing what is the square root of 2.
Why are you forcing me to know the right answer to be able to say another answer is the wrong answer?
blah blah nyingi ila hamna chochote ulichoandiaka hahaha.Your argument is a logical non sequitur fallacy.
I am telling you, in base 10 nath, the square root of 2 cannot be 10. It nust be smaller than 2. It cannot be 10, because 10 is larger than 2.
You are asking me what is tge square root if 2. I say I don't know. I only know tgat 10 is not the square root if 2.
I don't need to know the square root if 2 to know tgat 10 is not tge square root if 2.
But you are still insisting I must shiw you what is tge square root of 2.
But I never claimed to know the square root of 2, only that it is not 10.
Your objection is a logical fallacy, logical non sequitur.
I have given reasons why I say God does not exist.
I mentioned that the all knowing, all capable and all loving God can be proved to not exist, by proof by contradiction, using Epicurean Paradox and the problem of evil.
I have eliminated that as the origin of life.
I can say this is a wrong answer without knowing the right answer.
If I know the square root if 2 must be smaller than 2, I can know that 10 is not tge square root if 2 without knowing what is the square root of 2.
Why are you forcing me to know the right answer to be able to say another answer is the wrong answer?
This logical fallacy is called ad hominem attack.blah blah nyingi ila hamna chochote ulichoandiaka hahaha.
mwacheni Mungu aitwe MUNGU
Mungu hajawahi kuwepo hayupo na hata uwezekano wa kuwepo kwake Haupo.Kwa huvyo kwa vile swala analiwa na Simba basi Mungu hayupo? Ndio hoja yajo hii ??
Mtu akifa si lazima azikwe kidini, Sema kwa jamii nyingi za kiafrika zina mentality ya mtu akifa azikwe kidini.Atheists mkifa mnazikwaje? Mnaona vipi?
Kwa hiyo atheists wanazikwa kama mzoga wa mbwa?Mtu akifa si lazima azikwe kidini, Sema kwa jamii nyingi za kiafrika zina mentality ya mtu akifa azikwe kidini.