Special Thread: Yanayojiri Mgogoro wa Ukraine na Urusi. Nini chanzo na hatma ya mzozo?

Special Thread: Yanayojiri Mgogoro wa Ukraine na Urusi. Nini chanzo na hatma ya mzozo?

mohamedidrisa789 said:
Warusi wananipa furaha sana kwa kweli.[emoji635][emoji635][emoji635][emoji635][emoji635][emoji635][emoji635][emoji635][emoji635][emoji635][emoji635][emoji635][emoji635][emoji635][emoji635][emoji635][emoji635][emoji635][emoji635][emoji635][emoji635][emoji635][emoji635][emoji635][emoji635].

Nipo tayari hata kukana uraia wangu kwa ajiki ya Warusi.View attachment 2474001
Click to expand...
Unaonaje nikufanyie mchongo ukaolewe huko[emoji28]

Sent from my Infinix X660B using JamiiForums mobile app
 
T14 Armata said:
Kwanini Russia alitumia bombers ndani ya Syria zikadondosha mabomu, alikuwa na airbase pale Latakia. Si angetumia hizo missiles unazosema za 7000km range. Missiles are expensive ndio maana pro NATO walivyotutisha na Kinzhal hypersonic missile niliwaambia shangwe yao haitadumu Russia haiwezi afford kutumia very expensive missiles kila mission. Tangu wafyatue siku moja hadi leo sijawahi sikia habari za Kinzhal.

Su-25 ni ground attack, inafanya kazi yake vizuri, Ka-52 ni attack helicopter na ina performance ya chini navyoiona. Sababu kubwa ni kutotumia smart munitions wanapenda sana kutegemea unguided rockets na anti tank missiles zao zina range ndogo. Hizi ndege mbili sio air superiority, multirole wala omnirole kama Su-30, Mig-35 na jamii zake. Mi-28 siioni sana sijui kwanini.

Na si kweli kusema Russia inashindwa control ya anga la Ukraine kisa air defence systems za misaada. Hizo systems zimeanza letwa Russia ishachoka ilipoanza kuharibu miundombinu kwa makombora na nyingi zililetwa suicide drones za Iran zilipoanza kuingia. Miezi ilipita kabla Ukraine haijapokea AD system hata moja.

Suppression of Enemy Air Defense (SEAD) mission huanza kabla hata mwanajeshi mmoja hajakanyaga ardhi ya adui. Russia sio wendawazimu kusubiri waanze vita, wapigwe misururu yao kutoka Belarus, wafanye retreat kutoka Kiev na Kherson, wafyatue makombora miezi kadhaa ipite NATO waanze kutoa AD systems kisha ndio Russia waseme hatuwezi fanya SEAD kisa systems za misaada. Huo uwezo haupo, haupo kabisa. Wangekuwa na uwezo huo ndio jambo la kwanza wangefanya. Badala yake siku ya kwanza walifyatua makombora kama 100 hivi ambayo accuracy yake na effectiveness sio sawa na attack ya jets, pale jets zilitakiwa zifuatie kupunguza kabisa enemy air defence
Click to expand...
Kuhusu Hypersonic missiles, by laws of Physics silaha za Hypersonic bado hazimake sense, due to current technology in material physics, hata Russia silaha walizotumia Ukraine ni trial.

Hypersonic speed ni mach 5 and above (1 mach ni equal na speed of sound), Kwa hii Kinetic Energy + friction (inayotokana na air resistance) Hypersonic missiles haziwezi kumaintain speed ya mach 5 kuanzia launching stage, mid course na terminal stage otherwise those missiles zita melt, Russia hutawasikia tena wanaleta sound za kutumia High precision weapon

Technically wamechukua ICBM wakaweka kwenye ndege wakaita Hypersonic
 
Omary - Msamalia said:
Kuhusu Hypersonic missiles, by laws of Physics silaha za Hypersonic bado hazimake sense, due to current technology in material physics, hata Russia silaha walizotumia Ukraine ni trial.

Hypersonic speed ni mach 5 and above (1 mach ni equal na speed of sound), Kwa hii Kinetic Energy + friction (inayotokana na air resistance) Hypersonic missiles haziwezi kumaintain speed ya mach 5 kuanzia launching stage, mid course na terminal stage otherwise those missiles zita melt, Russia hutawasikia tena wanaleta sound za kutumia High precision weapon

Technically wamechukua ICBM wakaweka kwenye ndege wakaita Hypersonic
Click to expand...
Kwa hiyo unataka kusema hypersonic missiles ni nadharia tu lkn kwenye uhalisia haiwezekani!?

Hebu funguka kdg mkuu ututoe tongotongo
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Our Community

Coming Soon

Regional Communities

Coming Soon
Back
Top Bottom
Menu
Forums
New posts
Log in
Register