Special Thread: Yanayojiri Mgogoro wa Ukraine na Urusi. Nini chanzo na hatma ya mzozo?

Special Thread: Yanayojiri Mgogoro wa Ukraine na Urusi. Nini chanzo na hatma ya mzozo?

Hiyo Unayo iita Arab Spring Muhusika wahayo yote nihuyo huyo Marekani
Anacho fanya ni Kuwagombanisha Wenyewe kwa Wenyewe au Kuweka Migogoro ya nchi kwa nchi
Huyo ndio Kirusi kikuu cha Migogoro Duniani
Ukifuatilia Ugomvi wa Saudia na Iran Ulikuwa Hauna Maana na sana Ulichochewa na Marekani
kwasasa Nchi nyingi Zimestuka Upuuzi wa Marekani
Amani ya dunia.. ni hasara kubwa kwa viwanda vya siraha vya Marekani.
 
Mkuu usipoteze muda kwa kusambaza hadithi za aina hii.
Tafadhali lete majina ya hao majenerali! Maana majenerali ya nchi hizo yanafahamika. Nani hayupo tena, nani ametoweka???

(Ikiwa huwezi kuleta majina utambue kwamba umeamini hadithi isiyo na msingi)
Mkuu pole wewe kwa "uchovu wa propaganda"
Kwanza nikushtue tuu kwamba watu sio wajinga tena kama mnavyofikiri, unawapingia NATO kitu wanachokisema wenyewe, wew nia yako hasa ni nini? Angalia sifa ya hako kadude Kinzhal kwanza...

#Kinzhal rapidly accelerates to Mach 4 (4,900 km/h), and may reach speeds of up to Mach 10 (12,350 km/hr)#
Yaani kanaweza kutokea Urusi kakaingia USA na kurudi tena Urusi ndani ya 1hr..lisaa limoja, yaan kakipgwa kutokea pale Moscow kanafika New york kwa nusu saa..dk 30 tuu..

About kinzhal missile struck ukrainian comand center bunker
-------------------------------------
#On March 19, 2022, the Russian Ministry of Defense claimed it had fired a Kinzhal missile at a munitions depot around the town of Deliatyn in southwestern Ukraine#

Sasa kama wewe unapenda story nzurnzur tuu za NATO hawawez kukusimulia hizi za kutisha...

#Russia likely developed the unique missile to more easily target critical European infrastructure (e.g. airfields, warehouses, command centers, etc.) and to counter U.S. theater missile defenses such as THAAD#

Ndio maana hawatak kujipendekeza km kule Iraq na Libya...

#The United States was able to track the missile “in real-time” during its flight, according to CNN citing U.S. government officials#

Unaelewa maana ya real time? Yaani walikaona LIVE..kwenye radar zao pale ukrain...walikaona kaleee kanatumwa ndani ya sekunde kameshazama kwenye matundu yao ya kujificha...sasa watakaonaje in real time km sio comand center ilikua pale palipopigwa(ukrain) maana kadude kanakimbia sio poa..kilometa 4 kwa sekunde moja..yaani kanatoka mombasa hadi kakamega kwa dakika tatu na nusu, 3½minutes

"it's almost impossible to stop it. There's a reason they're using it..." Joe Biden

#wasemaji wa NATO wanakwambia hivi#
"US official said the Pentagon had not been able to confirm that the launch took place"
Wakati tayari wao ndio wakwanza kukatrack kadude kinzhal "in real time" ikimaanisha hao "United state" waliokiona live hawakua US, bali kwenye comand center Ukrain

Sasa mkuu usipende kufichaficha maana wenzio wameficha sanaaa...wanasemaje..?....false, misleading, and unevidenced claims as well as outright propaganda, often targeting nato and seeking undermining Western support to Ukrain have become a hallmark feature of this conflict, as reported widely by western media and others.....
Ila ukiskia makelele tuu jua vimeumana huko ground..

Ni mtu mwenye akili "dhaifu" tuu ataamin eti warusi wanakufa ila waukrain wanawaua warusi...yaani nipo kwako nakupiga..unajibu, naendelea kukupga alafu useme mimi ndio nakufa?[emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]
 
Wewe ni mpuuzi ,weka link hapa ya hiyo taarifa ,msiwe mnaandika vitu vya kutunga hapa , wendawazimu ninyi .
Mxieew
Mkuu pole wewe kwa "uchovu wa propaganda"
Kwanza nikushtue tuu kwamba watu sio wajinga tena kama mnavyofikiri, unawapingia NATO kitu wanachokisema wenyewe, wew nia yako hasa ni nini? Angalia sifa ya hako kadude Kinzhal kwanza...

#Kinzhal rapidly accelerates to Mach 4 (4,900 km/h), and may reach speeds of up to Mach 10 (12,350 km/hr)#
Yaani kanaweza kutokea Urusi kakaingia USA na kurudi tena Urusi ndani ya 1hr..lisaa limoja, yaan kakipgwa kutokea pale Moscow kanafika New york kwa nusu saa..dk 30 tuu..

About kinzhal missile struck ukrainian comand center bunker
-------------------------------------
#On March 19, 2022, the Russian Ministry of Defense claimed it had fired a Kinzhal missile at a munitions depot around the town of Deliatyn in southwestern Ukraine#

Sasa kama wewe unapenda story nzurnzur tuu za NATO hawawez kukusimulia hizi za kutisha...

#Russia likely developed the unique missile to more easily target critical European infrastructure (e.g. airfields, warehouses, command centers, etc.) and to counter U.S. theater missile defenses such as THAAD#

Ndio maana hawatak kujipendekeza km kule Iraq na Libya...

#The United States was able to track the missile “in real-time” during its flight, according to CNN citing U.S. government officials#

Unaelewa maana ya real time? Yaani walikaona LIVE..kwenye radar zao pale ukrain...walikaona kaleee kanatumwa ndani ya sekunde kameshazama kwenye matundu yao ya kujificha...sasa watakaonaje in real time km sio comand center ilikua pale palipopigwa(ukrain) maana kadude kanakimbia sio poa..kilometa 4 kwa sekunde moja..yaani kanatoka mombasa hadi kakamega kwa dakika tatu na nusu, 3½minutes

"it's almost impossible to stop it. There's a reason they're using it..." Joe Biden

#wasemaji wa NATO wanakwambia hivi#
"US official said the Pentagon had not been able to confirm that the launch took place"
Wakati tayari wao ndio wakwanza kukatrack kadude kinzhal "in real time" ikimaanisha hao "United state" waliokiona live hawakua US, bali kwenye comand center Ukrain

Sasa mkuu usipende kufichaficha maana wenzio wameficha sanaaa...wanasemaje..?....false, misleading, and unevidenced claims as well as outright propaganda, often targeting nato and seeking undermining Western support to Ukrain have become a hallmark feature of this conflict, as reported widely by western media and others.....
Ila ukiskia makelele tuu jua vimeumana huko ground..

Ni mtu mwenye akili "dhaifu" tuu ataamin eti warusi wanakufa ila waukrain wanawaua warusi...yaani nipo kwako nakupiga..unajibu, naendelea kukupga alafu useme mimi ndio nakufa?[emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]
 
Nato haikuenda Vietnam.
Ilienda Yugoslavia kuzuia mauaji ya Waislamu na Wakroatia na Waserbia (si sana kwa upendo lakini kwa hofu ya wimbi kubwa sana ya wakimbizi),
ilienda Afghanistan kwa sababu mwanachama wa NATO alishambuliwa kutoka eneo la Afghanistan.
Nato haikuenda Iraq ila nchi wanachama mbalimbali walienda wakifuata uwongo ulioaminiwa.
Heri tusikoroge kila kitu.
Kwa hiyo NATO akishambuliwa kutokea Tanzania (hata kama sio Tanzania imehusika) basi ni halali kwa NATO kuivamia Tanzania!?
 
Sasa kama ni halali kwa nini sio halali Urusi kuivamia Ukraine!? Double Standard!?

Alaf matunda ya kuivamia Afghanistan ni nini mpk sasa!? Uharibifu!? Maana hamna kilichobadilika
Mkuu mimi nimekujibu hapo juu sijajua mada umetokea wap ila nmeona swali lako lipo waz kujibk bila kujali msing wa swali

Pole kama nimeleta usumbufu.
 

Ukraine mocks Russian claim to have captured mining city of Bakhmut​

This photograph taken on March 26, 2023, shows a Ukrainian T-72 tank fires at Russian positions on the front line near Bakhmut, amid the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

This photograph taken on March 26, 2023, shows a Ukrainian T-72 tank fires at Russian positions on the front line near Bakhmut, amid the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
Sergey Shestak | Afp | Getty Images

Ukraine scorned Russian claims to have captured the eastern city of Bakhmut on Monday, saying its foes had raised a victory flag over "some kind of toilet" while combat was raging.

The battle for Bakhmut, a mining city and logistics hub, has been one of the bloodiest of the conflict, now in its second year, with many casualties on both sides and the city largely destroyed by bombardments.

Yevgeny Prigozhin, head of the Wagner mercenary force spearheading the siege, said on Sunday his troops had raised a Russian flag on the city-center administrative building even though Ukrainian soldiers still held some positions.

"From a legal point of view, Bakhmut has been taken," he said in a video on Telegram. "The enemy is concentrated in the western parts."

Prigozhin has previously made premature claims.
Ukraine's military said fighting was still raging around Bakhmut's city council building, as well as in several other nearby towns.

"Bakhmut is Ukrainian and they have not captured anything and are very far from doing that," Serhiy Cherevatyi, spokesperson for the eastern military command, told Reuters.

"They raised the flag over some kind of toilet. They attached it to the side of who knows what, hung their rag and said they had captured the city. Well good, let them think they've taken it," Cherevatyi added by telephone.
— Reuters

==========================

Warusi wanajitekenya na kucheka wenyewe...
Hongeren sana kwa kuulinda mji wa bakhmut...kazieni hapohapo msisogeze hata kalio moja..tulieni km mnachomwa sindano ya kichaa cha dog....
 
Counter offensive is around....
==========================

Tank tactics: how might Ukraine use its influx of western armour?​

Experts say weaponry will give Kyiv a psychological edge against Russia but is not enough for a ‘big punch’

Peter Beaumont

Peter Beaumont
@petersbeaumont1
Tue 4 Apr 2023 05.00 BS

In an anonymous muddy field somewhere inUkraine, the country’s defence minister crouched in the commander’s hatch of a British Challenger 2 tank, one of the first three of 14 to be delivered to Kyiv.

In a maroon jacket and matching baseball cap, Oleksii Reznikov gave a thumbs-up as he thanked the UK for the delivery of the system.

It is not only Challenger main battle tanks that are arriving. In recent weeks a steady flow of donated armour has been arriving in Ukraine. German Leopard 2 tanks and Marder infantry fighting vehicles, US Strykers and Cougars, scores in number, have been shipped discretely, with more to follow.

The sudden influx of new armour, as well as the accelerated training of Ukrainian crews to operate the vehicles in the UK and elsewhere, comes ahead of the expectation – raised by senior Ukrainian officials – that they may soon be in action as part of the country’s anticipated spring offensive.

And while over the winter Ukraine’s president, Volodmyr Zelenskiy, had been pressing for 300 main battle tanks as well as other vehicles and modern fighter jets, the much more modest numbers that have so far arrived is fuelling speculation over how that armour may be used in the coming weeks and months.

[IMG alt="n/a
DONBAS, UKRAINE - MARCH 29: Soldiers from the 214th Battalion test drive tanks as they prepare for battle at a temporary base on March 29, 2023 in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine. Ukraine’s military are preparing for a spring offensive as they wait for delivery of western weapons. (Photo by Ed Ram For The Guardian)"]https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/8981585c0f75b87ef6460d0b7a641a95c8557ab4/0_266_7952_4771/master/7952.jpg?width=460&quality=85&auto=format&fit=max&s=1a31ebcd4d8210ef4428c0e2febab753[/IMG]

Surrounded and outgunned, Ukraine’s tank crews prepare for battle of Bakhmut
Read more

With Russia’s own recent offensive in the eastern Donbas region apparently petering out with minimal gains and heavy losses, not least around the key eastern city of Bakhmut, there is little expectation that Ukraine has the resources for the kind of large-scale armoured thrust that Russia itself failed to carry off at the beginning of its invasion of Ukraine.

Instead, analysts – including former British tank commanders – anticipate a counteroffensive, or counteroffensives, similar to those that took large amounts of territory from Russia in the late summer and autumn around Kharkiv oblast and in the country’s south that led to the retaking of Kherson.

A Javelin missile is fired from a US Stryker infantry carrier vehicle in Fort Carson, Colorado

A Javelin missile is fired from a US Stryker infantry carrier vehicle in Fort Carson, Colorado. Photograph: Michael Ciaglo/Getty Images

And while they point to the south as the most likely theatre for a spring counteroffensive, they caution that Ukraine’s effective employment of misinformation and deception in last year’s fighting make feints and so-called demonstrations likely.

Among those who have been considering what the new armour arriving in Ukraine may mean for the war is Hamish de Bretton-Gordon, who served as a tank commander with 14th/20th King’s Hussars in the first Gulf war before going on to command the UK’s Joint Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Regiment.

For De Bretton-Gordon, one of the most significant aspects of the accumulating western armour in Ukraine is the psychological aspect.

“Psychologically, it is hugely positive for the Ukrainians and negative for the Russians. If we are just talking about numbers, then on the face of it 50 to 60 modern western tanks in Ukraine is not necessarily a gamechanger.

“I’ve said in the past that you would need a minimum of 100 for a big punch, and Ukraine has been talking about needing 300.”
Despite that, De Bretton-Gordon believes the superior capabilities the tanks offer in comparison with most Russian main battle tanks that have been deployed in Ukraine, and the more effective Ukrainian tactics, will make a difference.

“Let’s not forget that these tanks are in addition to the [Soviet and post-Soviet era] T72 tanks Ukraine already has, and they are arriving for a military that has been well trained in manoeuvre warfare and at a time when it is very clear that the Russians are incapable of anything but frontal attacks.”

In particular, De Bretton-Gordon says, the ability of Leopards to stand off and fire at greater range, and superior armour in comparison with many of the tanks being fielded by Moscow, may give them an edge. They also have a better ability to operate cross-country in comparison with the lower-clearance Russian tanks and fight effectively at night.

A Ukrainian tank in the frontline area near Bakhmut, Ukraine

A Ukrainian tank in the frontline area near Bakhmut. The new tanks are superior to those currently used.Photograph: Anadolu Agency/Getty Images

With the relatively small numbers available, the question is to what use they will be put.

“Armour works best in a shock action breaking [enemy lines],” says De Bretton-Gordon. “They will want to concentrate firepower rather than disperse it.
“That’s where I think western armour comes in with the rest of the Ukrainian armour following. What feels most logical is something more limited, like breaking the connection between Russian-occupied parts of the Donbas and south.

“I can see them wanting to create a widening gap and dislocating the Russians by driving a couple hundred-mile route through that area [south and east of Zaporizhzhia].”

Stuart Crawford, who served as an officer in the 4th Royal Tank Regiment, also believes while there are not enough tanks and other western armoured vehicles arriving in Ukraine to make a dramatic difference, they may be useful in a more limited counteroffensive, again pointing towards the south.

“It can’t be the classic punch-a-hole followed by an expanding torrent approach. It’s going to be more localised. And if you are looking at it from a strategic point of view the clear thing that has been talked about is an offensive south from Zaporizhzhia towards Melitopol.”

He adds: “The quality of the tanks arriving is superior to most of the stuff of Russian and Soviet/post-Soviet origin currently being used on both sides.”

Crawford is also sceptical of suggestions that having so many different weapons systems coming from different sources will necessarily cause maintenance and logistical problems.

“If you look at the experience of the allies in Normandy in 1944 they had a vast array of equipment from different sources, and still managed.

“But logistically, it probably makes sense to put all the Leopards into the same organisation.”

Where Crawford does see a gap, however, is in the potential lack of air support.

Neither side has achieved overall air superiority, which is why the Ukrainians have been so vocal in asking for US F16 jets, which are widely available, because without air superiority ground forces cannot move easily.

As well as the tanks, Crawford sees the arrival of armoured infantry carriers such as the US Strykers as also being highly useful on a “battlefield so dominated by artillery”.

What does seem clear from Ukrainian statements, and Russian defensive preparations, is that whatever Ukraine is planning to do with its new weapons will be revealed sooner rather than later.
Wanaleta makala ndeeefuu badala ya kuleta hyo counter-off-show
 
Kitu ambacho nakiona Kwa Sasa Mchina anfurahia hivi vita kwasababu anapata mafuta Kwa bei ya chini wakati washindani wake ulaya na Amerika bei juu, pili Marekani inakuwa bize na urusi na hivyo kumpa nafasi Mchina kijitanua katika bahari ya china na maeneo ya karibu. Na hasa kuisumbua taiwan
Hapo mzee mwenzangu umewaza tofauti. US yupo kwa ukaribu sana ishu za Taiwan, jamaa hapoi, ni superpower hasa.
 
"Emmanuel Macron arrived in China for a three-day visit. No welcome. The Chinese President was absent. Not a single official to welcome him. Macron could shake hands only with the the guy who opened the door of the airplane. What a humiliation"…
​
 
Back
Top Bottom