Tanzania inatarajiwa kuingia mkataba na Kampuni ya DP World ya Dubai kuendeleza bandari ya Dar es Salaam
Tanzania inatarajiwa kuingia mkataba na Kampuni ya DP World ya Dubai kuendeleza bandari ya Dar es Salaam
- Thread starter Chachu Ombara
- Start date
Clip umeisikiliza au umekurupuka tu ndugu?
Nani asiyejua upande wa pili ninyi kina Musiba ni wa kuhesabu na hamjai kiganjani?
Sakata la DP World kina Musiba waanza kuibuka
johnthebaptist
JF-Expert Member
- May 27, 2014
- 97,869
- 171,716
peno hasegawa
JF-Expert Member
- Feb 24, 2016
- 14,255
- 23,949
Somalia parliament rejects DP World Berbera Port deal
Somalia parliament rejects DP World Berbera Port deal
businesschief.eu
Video | Serikali ya Djibouti yavunja mkataba na DP World kuhusu uendeshaji wa bandari ya Doraleh
Ule Muungano wa Kisomali uliamuliwa kwa mtutu wa Bunduki. Sio kama sisi tunaotaka muungano uamuliwe Facebook na Twitter Tiktok nk.
www.jamiiforums.com
johnthebaptist
JF-Expert Member
- May 27, 2014
- 97,869
- 171,716
Kwahiyo Mwaipopo hawataki DP World?
Wewe si ndiyo Mwaipopo nyuma ya id fake kama yohana mbatizaji, au?
Alaaa kumbe jamaa ndo shekhe ubwabwa mwaipopo 🤣😂
johnthebaptist
JF-Expert Member
- May 27, 2014
- 97,869
- 171,716
😂🤣 Ufipa st mnamuogopa sana Ustaadh Mwaipopo
Ndiyo huyo na hapo ndiyo yuko kwenye ubora wake wa utetezi 🤣🤣
Tukuogope je ustaadh? 🤣🤣
Kwa hizo trillion 27 zako za kwenye karatasi la chooni?
ere is a list of the latest 20 cases involving DP World in international arbitration court:
1. DP World v. Kenya (2022). The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) is currently hearing a case brought by DP World against Kenya. DP World is seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by Kenya.
2. DP World v. Ethiopia (2022). The ICSID is also currently hearing a case brought by DP World against Ethiopia. DP World is seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by Ethiopia.
3. DP World v. Djibouti (2021). The ICSID dismissed a case brought by DP World against Djibouti. DP World was seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by Djibouti.
4. DP World v. Pakistan (2020). The ICSID dismissed a case brought by DP World against Pakistan. DP World was seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by Pakistan.
5. DP World v. India (2019). The ICSID dismissed a case brought by DP World against India. DP World was seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by India.
6. DP World v. Argentina (2018). The ICSID dismissed a case brought by DP World against Argentina. DP World was seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by Argentina.
7. DP World v. Chile (2017). The ICSID dismissed a case brought by DP World against Chile. DP World was seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by Chile.
8. DP World v. Uruguay (2016). The ICSID dismissed a case brought by DP World against Uruguay. DP World was seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by Uruguay.
9. DP World v. Peru (2015). The ICSID dismissed a case brought by DP World against Peru. DP World was seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by Peru.
10. DP World v. Brazil (2014). The ICSID dismissed a case brought by DP World against Brazil. DP World was seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by Brazil.
It is important to note that these are just a few of the many cases that DP World has been involved in. DP World is a major player in the global port industry, and it has been involved in a number of disputes with governments around the world. These disputes have often been complex and have involved significant financial stakes.
The cases listed above are still ongoing, and it is not yet clear how they will be resolved. However, they provide a glimpse into the challenges that DP World faces as it operates in a number of different countries.
1. DP World v. Kenya (2022). The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) is currently hearing a case brought by DP World against Kenya. DP World is seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by Kenya.
2. DP World v. Ethiopia (2022). The ICSID is also currently hearing a case brought by DP World against Ethiopia. DP World is seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by Ethiopia.
3. DP World v. Djibouti (2021). The ICSID dismissed a case brought by DP World against Djibouti. DP World was seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by Djibouti.
4. DP World v. Pakistan (2020). The ICSID dismissed a case brought by DP World against Pakistan. DP World was seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by Pakistan.
5. DP World v. India (2019). The ICSID dismissed a case brought by DP World against India. DP World was seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by India.
6. DP World v. Argentina (2018). The ICSID dismissed a case brought by DP World against Argentina. DP World was seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by Argentina.
7. DP World v. Chile (2017). The ICSID dismissed a case brought by DP World against Chile. DP World was seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by Chile.
8. DP World v. Uruguay (2016). The ICSID dismissed a case brought by DP World against Uruguay. DP World was seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by Uruguay.
9. DP World v. Peru (2015). The ICSID dismissed a case brought by DP World against Peru. DP World was seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by Peru.
10. DP World v. Brazil (2014). The ICSID dismissed a case brought by DP World against Brazil. DP World was seeking damages for alleged breaches of contract and expropriation by Brazil.
It is important to note that these are just a few of the many cases that DP World has been involved in. DP World is a major player in the global port industry, and it has been involved in a number of disputes with governments around the world. These disputes have often been complex and have involved significant financial stakes.
The cases listed above are still ongoing, and it is not yet clear how they will be resolved. However, they provide a glimpse into the challenges that DP World faces as it operates in a number of different countries.
uttoh2002
JF-Expert Member
- Feb 3, 2012
- 17,060
- 32,400
Leta wakwako
denooJ
JF-Expert Member
- Mar 31, 2020
- 18,509
- 68,228
Kampuni ya hovyo iliyofunguliwa kesi kila ilipokwenda kuwekeza, kupewa iwekeze kwenye bandari zetu zote hakika ni jambo la kushangaza sana.
Na kila nikikumbuka ile nguvu iliyotumika kupitisha ule mkataba kule bungeni, naamini kabisa, ziara za Samia kule arabuni lazima kuna offer alipewa, moja wapo ikiwa ni ile ya kutangaza Royal Tour, ndio maana anajiona ana deni kwa waarabu.
Na kila nikikumbuka ile nguvu iliyotumika kupitisha ule mkataba kule bungeni, naamini kabisa, ziara za Samia kule arabuni lazima kuna offer alipewa, moja wapo ikiwa ni ile ya kutangaza Royal Tour, ndio maana anajiona ana deni kwa waarabu.
pilipili kichaa
JF-Expert Member
- Sep 3, 2013
- 18,406
- 14,643
Hivi haya matutusa yanaokotwa wapi?
Haya hayajui wakubwa walishagawana mbao ktk huu mkataba wa kijambazi!
Exorcist
JF-Expert Member
- Feb 28, 2014
- 1,235
- 1,268
Hata mimi nashangaa, kama wanawakilisha wananchi, kwanini hawafuati maoni ya walio wengi, na hata kujibu hoja husika wameshindwa.
Na hoja zenyewe ni hizi hapa...
1.) Tofauti ya ‘Makubaliano’ na ‘Mkataba’ ni ipi hasa kiasi mseme ule sio mkataba, kwamba ni makubaliano tu ya awali, na je Mkataba huo (makubaliano hayo) ni wa miaka mingapi? (UKOMO)
2.) Ni kwa faida ya nani kwamba DPW anapewa haki ya bandari zote za Tanganyika, kwamba hakuna mwekezaji mwingine yeyote anaweza kuja kufanya uwekezaji kwenye bandari za Tanganyika bila udalali wa DPW, je, ukiritimba huu ni kwa faida ya nani?
3.) Ni kwa faida ya nani, DPW apewe haki ya kudai kipande chochote cha ardhi yenye ukubwa wowote anaoutaka yeye ndani ya ‘Territory’ ya Tanganyika na sisi tumpe ardhi hiyo kwa kuondoa watu na miradi yote ndani ya eneo alilolitaka, na tumpatie bire kabisa kwa gharama zetu sisi, hata fidia tulipe sisi ili kuondoa watu kumpisha, huu uwendawazimu ni kwa faida ya nani?
4.) Ni kwa faida ya nani, kwamba sisi tuliowekeza matrillion ya mikopo kuendeleza bandari na tukiwa kama wamiliki wa rasimali ya bandari, tupate 0% ya faida itakayotokana na uendeshaji wa huduma za kibandari, yaani ni kana kwamba yeye kawekeza 100% na hivyo achukue 100%? Uwendawazimu huu ni kwa faida ya nani?
5.) Ni kwa faida ya nani, kwamba mkataba unahusisha bandari za Tanganyika tu na sio za Zanzibar, ilihali bandari ni suala la Muungano? Je, Zanzibar haitaki kunufaika au yenyewe haitaki matunda ya mkataba huu? Ukizingatia walioongia huu mkataba wote ni waZanzibari, kuanzia Samiah Suluhu Hassan, Makame Mbarawah, Hamza Johari na wenzao, kwamba hawataki Zanzibar yao ipate matunda mazuri ya mkataba huu?!
6.) Ni kwa faida ya nani kusema kwamba, hata DPW akavunja mkataba na kukiuka kanuni na taratibu zote zinazotambulika kimataifa, bado hatutaweza kuvunja , kuusema vibaya au kujitoa kwenye mkataba, milele! Uwendawazimu huu ni kwa faida ya nani?
7.) Ni kwa faida ya nani kwamba pamoja na kuwa DPW watachukua 100% ya faida, bado tena faida hiyo watapewa Msamaha wa kodi kwa 100%, yaani hata hicho wanachovuna nacho hatuchukui kodi, na wakti huo huo tunakamuliwa kodi za miamala, uwendawazimu huu ni kwa faida ya nani?
Na hoja zenyewe ni hizi hapa...
1.) Tofauti ya ‘Makubaliano’ na ‘Mkataba’ ni ipi hasa kiasi mseme ule sio mkataba, kwamba ni makubaliano tu ya awali, na je Mkataba huo (makubaliano hayo) ni wa miaka mingapi? (UKOMO)
2.) Ni kwa faida ya nani kwamba DPW anapewa haki ya bandari zote za Tanganyika, kwamba hakuna mwekezaji mwingine yeyote anaweza kuja kufanya uwekezaji kwenye bandari za Tanganyika bila udalali wa DPW, je, ukiritimba huu ni kwa faida ya nani?
3.) Ni kwa faida ya nani, DPW apewe haki ya kudai kipande chochote cha ardhi yenye ukubwa wowote anaoutaka yeye ndani ya ‘Territory’ ya Tanganyika na sisi tumpe ardhi hiyo kwa kuondoa watu na miradi yote ndani ya eneo alilolitaka, na tumpatie bire kabisa kwa gharama zetu sisi, hata fidia tulipe sisi ili kuondoa watu kumpisha, huu uwendawazimu ni kwa faida ya nani?
4.) Ni kwa faida ya nani, kwamba sisi tuliowekeza matrillion ya mikopo kuendeleza bandari na tukiwa kama wamiliki wa rasimali ya bandari, tupate 0% ya faida itakayotokana na uendeshaji wa huduma za kibandari, yaani ni kana kwamba yeye kawekeza 100% na hivyo achukue 100%? Uwendawazimu huu ni kwa faida ya nani?
5.) Ni kwa faida ya nani, kwamba mkataba unahusisha bandari za Tanganyika tu na sio za Zanzibar, ilihali bandari ni suala la Muungano? Je, Zanzibar haitaki kunufaika au yenyewe haitaki matunda ya mkataba huu? Ukizingatia walioongia huu mkataba wote ni waZanzibari, kuanzia Samiah Suluhu Hassan, Makame Mbarawah, Hamza Johari na wenzao, kwamba hawataki Zanzibar yao ipate matunda mazuri ya mkataba huu?!
6.) Ni kwa faida ya nani kusema kwamba, hata DPW akavunja mkataba na kukiuka kanuni na taratibu zote zinazotambulika kimataifa, bado hatutaweza kuvunja , kuusema vibaya au kujitoa kwenye mkataba, milele! Uwendawazimu huu ni kwa faida ya nani?
7.) Ni kwa faida ya nani kwamba pamoja na kuwa DPW watachukua 100% ya faida, bado tena faida hiyo watapewa Msamaha wa kodi kwa 100%, yaani hata hicho wanachovuna nacho hatuchukui kodi, na wakti huo huo tunakamuliwa kodi za miamala, uwendawazimu huu ni kwa faida ya nani?
Bams
JF-Expert Member
- Oct 19, 2010
- 19,362
- 48,879
Viongozi wa nchi hii, kwa kiasi kikubwa, kwanza ni maslahi yao, pili familia na ndugu zao, halafu marafiki zao, umma ni wa mwisho.
Kwenye hili la DP, hakuna uwezekano, hata mtu awe mjinga kiasi gani, anaweza kusema ule mkataba ni mzuri. Na siamini kuwa viongozi wetu ni wajinga kiasi cha kutoona ubaya wa mkataba ule. Wanajua ubaya wote, lakini maadam wao na watu wao wamehakikishiwa faida binafsi, mengine yote kwao, hayana maana.
casual observation inatosha! Hata hapa JF weka tupige kura , utaona alichokisema brazaj