Well, I don't support Gadaffi for being in power for more than 40 years. However, I don't support Obama's plan and indeed lust desire to impose no fly zone in Libya and the intention to invade Gadaffi Militarily.
Why prohibit Gadaffi to fight against armed terrorist? Does US and Obama justify terroristic way of Revolution? Gadaffi is not opening fire to demonstrators. What is going on in Libya is not demonstration like it was in Eqypt and Tunisia, it is typical terrorism though it started as demonstration.
Forcing Gadaffi, to stop fighting against terrorist, and forcing him to withdraw his armies from some parts of his country is unacceptable, and contrary to state sovereignty principles.
What I see is that Obama is going to invade Libya unjustifiably, just like Bush did to IRAQ, this is unacceptable. Obama is forcefully insisting at this Juncture, where it is clear that Gadaffi is on the way to Victory.
I call this "OBAMA'S FIRST STUPIDITY
I WISH THIS HAPPENS ONE DAY IN THE LAND OF THE USA so that we can see how the USA will deal with this matter. "NON-SENSE"