Mahakamani 28 Septemba: Kesi ya uhaini ya Tundu Lissu dhidi ya Jamhuri

[The Icebreaker]

Tumewasili mkuu kuona watesi wanasemaje leo.

Sawa,Basi kaa chini,unatuzuwia sisi tuliopo nyuma kuona.

 

[Tlaatlaah]

Drinking enough water each day is crucial for many reasons: to regulate body temperature, keep joints lubricated, prevent infections lastly makes him hard as energizer when ***’n with akina Katuga

Mwanzo wa kesi alikua akienda kizimbani na kiporo cha ubwabwa na maharagwe, wafuasi wake wakamcheka na kumwambia aache njaa kali, kiporo husababisha changamoto za minyoo ndio akaacha,

Baada ya,
heche,amani na brenda kumkaanga na kumsagia kunguni mahakamani, na kuona kabisa kitanzi hiki hapa,

sasa anajikuta ana kiu mbaya sana,
usingizi kama wote,
.Si unajua tena last moments za mja wa Allah akiwa anaelekea ku r.i.p?🐒

 

[The Icebreaker]

We bwege saa ngapi unafanya kazi? Ndiyo uje ulalamike serikali ya CCM imekufanya maskini? We ni hasara kwa mamako na kwa Taifa

Mkuu,kwani nini maana ya kazi?

Vipi kama ikiwa hiki anachokifanya ndio kazi yake?

 

[binti kiziwi]

Sawa,Basi kaa chini,unatuzuwia sisi tuliopo nyuma kuona.

😂😂😂

Kwanza iambie mahakama we uko kundi gani? La watesi, Wateswaji au we ni refa?

 

[The Icebreaker]

😂😂😂

Kwanza iambie mahakama we uko kundi gani? La watesi, Wateswaji au we ni refa?

Mimi sina kundi, hua sipo kabisa kwenye hayo mambo ya siasa mkuu,
Ila nipo interested sana kufuatilia kesi za aina hii,najifunza mambo mengi sana,

Labda tuanzishe kundi letu mimi na wewe tu.

 

[binti kiziwi]

Labda tuanzishe kundi letu mimi na wewe tu.

😂😂😂 Wewe bwana wewe! Haya ipo siku yako. Kwanza nilikukamata unachit sijakusemea hadi sasa, itabidi unipe chochote kitu.

 

[Manyanza]

TUNDU LISSU ANAFANYA MAJUMUISHO YA MWISHO MAHAKAMANI

SEHEMU YA 5.

Lissu: Na alipogundua kwamba hili la kutowashirikisha wanasheria ni jambo baya, akala matapishi yake katika ukurasa wa 169, akasema:

PW1: “The Chief Investigator, Amini Mahamba, was the one who communicated to DPP.”

“The DPP and his officers knew because all communication was online.”

Hapa anakula matapishi yake kwamba DPP alikuwa anajua kupitia Amini Mahamba na maafisa wake online.

That is a contradiction, Waheshimiwa Majaji.

Na, in any case, hakuna ushahidi wowote kwamba DPP alijulishwa na Bagyemu au Mahamba.

Waheshimiwa Majaji, jambo la tano ni kwamba PW1 hakuhusisha wala kutoa taarifa kwa mamlaka nyingine ya kiuchunguzi wala ya Serikali kuhusu hilo faili la uhaini.

Waheshimiwa Majaji, sitochoka kuwakumbusheni: faili linalozungumziwa ni la kosa la uhaini, siyo kesi ya wizi wa maembe.

Hakuhusisha wala kushirikisha mamlaka nyingine yoyote ya kiuchunguzi au ya Serikali.

Ushahidi unasema nini? Ukurasa wa 170, Waheshimiwa Majaji.

Jaji Ndunguru: Hii ni hoja ya tano au ya nne? Sisi tunaona ni ya nne.

Lissu: Nafikiri ni ya nne, Waheshimiwa Majaji.

PW1: “Treason is a highly profiled case.”

Anakubali kwamba kesi ya uhaini ni kesi kubwa na inahusu usalama.

Baadaye anasema hajawasiliana na Mkuu wa Idara ya Ujasusi wa Mkoa wala Mkurugenzi wa Usalama na Ujasusi kwa sababu siyo kazi yake.

Kesi inayohusu uhaini, anasema kwamba hajawasiliana na wanaohusika na usalama wa Taifa.

Huo ndiyo ushahidi, Waheshimiwa Majaji, ambao mnatakiwa mtoe hukumu ya kifo.

Hayo niliyoyasema kuhusu ushahidi wa PW1 hayakuwa reclassified.

Hakuna hata mmoja aliyeomba shahidi clarify hii damaging information, ukurasa wa 176.

Wakakubali kila kitu kwamba hakutoa taarifa kwa yeyote, halafu wanategemea Mahakama itoe hukumu ya kifo.

Huo ndiyo ushahidi wa PW1.

Vipi kuhusu ushahidi wa PW16, Amini Mahamba?

Waheshimiwa Majaji, kuhusu ushahidi wa msingi wa PW16:

Ni PW16 kuhusu kumeza hadithi ya PW1; alikubali kula kitu alichoambiwa na PW1.

Kitu cha pili, Waheshimiwa Majaji, nilisema wiki iliyopita juu ya confusion and contradiction.

PW16 anatofautiana kuhusu nani waliokuwa wapelelezi. Lugha inagongana.

Ukurasa wa 460, PW16 anasema hivi kuhusu Investigation Team ilikuwa na:

“SSP George Bagyemu, one officer from Office of DPP Dodoma.”

Maana yake ni kwamba anasema kulikuwa na ofisa kutoka Ofisi ya DPP ambaye hakutajwa jina.

PW1 anasema hakuwa na mwanasheria.

PW16 anasema kulikuwa na mtu kutoka Dodoma.

Kwa muda ambao PW16 anasema palikuwa na mwanasheria kutoka Ofisi ya DPP, ni kama kujaribu kuokoa jahazi.

Ndiyo maana nilipomuuliza, “Ofisa wa DPP anaitwa nani?” akasema hakumbuki, ana jina moja hivi la Kibantu.

Katika ukurasa wa 460, anasema ni kweli George Bagyemu anasema hakukuwa na mwanasheria, lakini Mahakama ikubali ushahidi wangu kwamba palikuwa na mwanasheria.

Sasa, kama Mahakama ikikubali ushahidi wa PW16, maana yake PW1 ni mwongo.

Sasa, ni Mahakama gani itakubali kunyonga kwa ushahidi huu?

WEKA EMOJI KAMA UNASOMA

SHARE ZAIDI UJUMBE UFIKE MBALI

 

[Kiboko ya Mazwazwa]

huenda leo akanywa lita 30 za maji, kabla hajaanza kusinzia akiwa kasimama anajieleza kizimbani na kisha kuwaomba poo majaji as last time 🐒

mapigwa miti yamechanganyikiwa na bado mpaka maji muite mma

 

[Bagamoyo]

28 September 2026
High of Tanzania
Kivukoni Front
Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

Treason case no. 19605 / 2025
Republic versus Tundu Lissu

"On 7th april 2025 in the morning i instructed Assistant Inspector of pol8ce - ASP . Michael to Open two diffrent case files. One for the treason and the second for publication of false infirmation. That order complied with. Treason case opened with no.....

Narrated by SDP Updates PART video 1 :
View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bZadqqxZgjQ

; I formed Investigation team and then communicated with DCP Ng'anzi and informed him about opening the treason file and he told me that he add deputy commissioner of police - DCP Amin Mahamba as part of the investigating team.

The National [Tanzanian] Prosecution Act where the offence involve death penalty the director of Public Prosecution - DPP's office must be informed.

The NPS Act provide that the DPP must be informed on the investigation of the offence

“I testified after watching the video clip, I was satsified that the accused formed an intention to overthrow the goverment

Narrated by SDP Updates PART 2 video :
View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jp6YcGI34Tw

the protected witnesses [annonymous] were in deed arrested by the police kwasababu walikuwa wanapanga kufanya fujo na kushawishiana. It is true that upon their arrest they admitted they have been planing to engage in those violence and that they recorded statement in that respect.

These act constituted criminal offences. When they were brought before the Court they admitted the charges.

"The chief investigator deputy commissioner of police - DCP Amin Mahamba was the one who reported to the DPP by the time I opened the file I did not report officially to DPP

Nguza Viking alias Babu Seya case : page 25 a conviction in criminal cases is not based on contradiction of the defence evidence rather on the evidence adduced by the prosecution witnesses. Burden of proof lies on the prosecution side and not on the defence and the standard is beyond reasonable doubt.

Discrepancies from the defence may assist the court to determine the prosecution has proved the case beyond reasonable doubt

comparing the 2 testimonies side by side one could not believe these two Senior Police Officer they were talking about the same case.

“I testified after watching the video clip, I was satsified that the accused formed an intention to overthrow the goverment.

He did not involve or report to any other government authority about the open up of the treason file

Elpsis ........

I did not involve [TISS] Regional Security Officer - RSO of Dar es salaam, Director of Tanzanian Intelligence Security Services TISS or any officer in the investigation.

These act constituted criminal offences. When they were brought before the Court they admitted the charges.

It is true that upon their arrest they admitted they have been planing to engage in those violence and that they recorded statement in that respect.

Narrated by SDP Updates : Video part 3 :
View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=zfLjYxHXBCM

Honourable judges , facts are very sturbon things

Tundu Lissu tells the panel of Judges of The High Court of Tanzania during his Final Submisdion that : Prosecution by manipulation of a charge sheet and deliberately omitting core evidence and selectively picks words to escalate a charge to something as severe as treason, it undermines the right to a fair trial.

Narrate by
EPISODE 97 : Uhuru Media Online 28 September 2026


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=B5pKHSy9PR4


Narrate by
EPISODE 98 : Uhuru Media Online 28 September 2026

View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nL_Apw5mQCY

 

[Mwami Ntale]

Tunashukuru kwa updates hizi

 

[President of China]

Nimetia timu kuweka TATHIMINI YA KISOMI

 

[ShesRise_1]

TUNDU LISSU ANAFANYA MAJUMUISHO YA MWISHO MAHAKAMANI

SEHEMU YA 5.

Lissu: Na alipogundua kwamba hili la kutowashirikisha wanasheria ni jambo baya, akala matapishi yake katika ukurasa wa 169, akasema:

PW1: “The Chief Investigator, Amini Mahamba, was the one who communicated to DPP.”

“The DPP and his officers knew because all communication was online.”

Hapa anakula matapishi yake kwamba DPP alikuwa anajua kupitia Amini Mahamba na maafisa wake online.

That is a contradiction, Waheshimiwa Majaji.

Na, in any case, hakuna ushahidi wowote kwamba DPP alijulishwa na Bagyemu au Mahamba.

Waheshimiwa Majaji, jambo la tano ni kwamba PW1 hakuhusisha wala kutoa taarifa kwa mamlaka nyingine ya kiuchunguzi wala ya Serikali kuhusu hilo faili la uhaini.

Waheshimiwa Majaji, sitochoka kuwakumbusheni: faili linalozungumziwa ni la kosa la uhaini, siyo kesi ya wizi wa maembe.

Hakuhusisha wala kushirikisha mamlaka nyingine yoyote ya kiuchunguzi au ya Serikali.

Ushahidi unasema nini? Ukurasa wa 170, Waheshimiwa Majaji.

Jaji Ndunguru: Hii ni hoja ya tano au ya nne? Sisi tunaona ni ya nne.

Lissu: Nafikiri ni ya nne, Waheshimiwa Majaji.

PW1: “Treason is a highly profiled case.”

Anakubali kwamba kesi ya uhaini ni kesi kubwa na inahusu usalama.

Baadaye anasema hajawasiliana na Mkuu wa Idara ya Ujasusi wa Mkoa wala Mkurugenzi wa Usalama na Ujasusi kwa sababu siyo kazi yake.

Kesi inayohusu uhaini, anasema kwamba hajawasiliana na wanaohusika na usalama wa Taifa.

Huo ndiyo ushahidi, Waheshimiwa Majaji, ambao mnatakiwa mtoe hukumu ya kifo.

Hayo niliyoyasema kuhusu ushahidi wa PW1 hayakuwa reclassified.

Hakuna hata mmoja aliyeomba shahidi clarify hii damaging information, ukurasa wa 176.

Wakakubali kila kitu kwamba hakutoa taarifa kwa yeyote, halafu wanategemea Mahakama itoe hukumu ya kifo.

Huo ndiyo ushahidi wa PW1.

Vipi kuhusu ushahidi wa PW16, Amini Mahamba?

Waheshimiwa Majaji, kuhusu ushahidi wa msingi wa PW16:

Ni PW16 kuhusu kumeza hadithi ya PW1; alikubali kula kitu alichoambiwa na PW1.

Kitu cha pili, Waheshimiwa Majaji, nilisema wiki iliyopita juu ya confusion and contradiction.

PW16 anatofautiana kuhusu nani waliokuwa wapelelezi. Lugha inagongana.

Ukurasa wa 460, PW16 anasema hivi kuhusu Investigation Team ilikuwa na:

“SSP George Bagyemu, one officer from Office of DPP Dodoma.”

Maana yake ni kwamba anasema kulikuwa na ofisa kutoka Ofisi ya DPP ambaye hakutajwa jina.

PW1 anasema hakuwa na mwanasheria.

PW16 anasema kulikuwa na mtu kutoka Dodoma.

Kwa muda ambao PW16 anasema palikuwa na mwanasheria kutoka Ofisi ya DPP, ni kama kujaribu kuokoa jahazi.

Ndiyo maana nilipomuuliza, “Ofisa wa DPP anaitwa nani?” akasema hakumbuki, ana jina moja hivi la Kibantu.

Katika ukurasa wa 460, anasema ni kweli George Bagyemu anasema hakukuwa na mwanasheria, lakini Mahakama ikubali ushahidi wangu kwamba palikuwa na mwanasheria.

Sasa, kama Mahakama ikikubali ushahidi wa PW16, maana yake PW1 ni mwongo.

Sasa, ni Mahakama gani itakubali kunyonga kwa ushahidi huu?

WEKA EMOJI KAMA UNASOMA

SHARE ZAIDI UJUMBE UFIKE MBALI

Kazi nzuri kaka ake!

 

[Sozo_]

TUNDU LISSU ANAFANYA MAJUMUISHO YA MWISHO MAHAKAMANI

SEHEMU YA 5.

Lissu: Na alipogundua kwamba hili la kutowashirikisha wanasheria ni jambo baya, akala matapishi yake katika ukurasa wa 169, akasema:

PW1: “The Chief Investigator, Amini Mahamba, was the one who communicated to DPP.”

“The DPP and his officers knew because all communication was online.”

Hapa anakula matapishi yake kwamba DPP alikuwa anajua kupitia Amini Mahamba na maafisa wake online.

That is a contradiction, Waheshimiwa Majaji.

Na, in any case, hakuna ushahidi wowote kwamba DPP alijulishwa na Bagyemu au Mahamba.

Waheshimiwa Majaji, jambo la tano ni kwamba PW1 hakuhusisha wala kutoa taarifa kwa mamlaka nyingine ya kiuchunguzi wala ya Serikali kuhusu hilo faili la uhaini.

Waheshimiwa Majaji, sitochoka kuwakumbusheni: faili linalozungumziwa ni la kosa la uhaini, siyo kesi ya wizi wa maembe.

Hakuhusisha wala kushirikisha mamlaka nyingine yoyote ya kiuchunguzi au ya Serikali.

Ushahidi unasema nini? Ukurasa wa 170, Waheshimiwa Majaji.

Jaji Ndunguru: Hii ni hoja ya tano au ya nne? Sisi tunaona ni ya nne.

Lissu: Nafikiri ni ya nne, Waheshimiwa Majaji.

PW1: “Treason is a highly profiled case.”

Anakubali kwamba kesi ya uhaini ni kesi kubwa na inahusu usalama.

Baadaye anasema hajawasiliana na Mkuu wa Idara ya Ujasusi wa Mkoa wala Mkurugenzi wa Usalama na Ujasusi kwa sababu siyo kazi yake.

Kesi inayohusu uhaini, anasema kwamba hajawasiliana na wanaohusika na usalama wa Taifa.

Huo ndiyo ushahidi, Waheshimiwa Majaji, ambao mnatakiwa mtoe hukumu ya kifo.

Hayo niliyoyasema kuhusu ushahidi wa PW1 hayakuwa reclassified.

Hakuna hata mmoja aliyeomba shahidi clarify hii damaging information, ukurasa wa 176.

Wakakubali kila kitu kwamba hakutoa taarifa kwa yeyote, halafu wanategemea Mahakama itoe hukumu ya kifo.

Huo ndiyo ushahidi wa PW1.

Vipi kuhusu ushahidi wa PW16, Amini Mahamba?

Waheshimiwa Majaji, kuhusu ushahidi wa msingi wa PW16:

Ni PW16 kuhusu kumeza hadithi ya PW1; alikubali kula kitu alichoambiwa na PW1.

Kitu cha pili, Waheshimiwa Majaji, nilisema wiki iliyopita juu ya confusion and contradiction.

PW16 anatofautiana kuhusu nani waliokuwa wapelelezi. Lugha inagongana.

Ukurasa wa 460, PW16 anasema hivi kuhusu Investigation Team ilikuwa na:

“SSP George Bagyemu, one officer from Office of DPP Dodoma.”

Maana yake ni kwamba anasema kulikuwa na ofisa kutoka Ofisi ya DPP ambaye hakutajwa jina.

PW1 anasema hakuwa na mwanasheria.

PW16 anasema kulikuwa na mtu kutoka Dodoma.

Kwa muda ambao PW16 anasema palikuwa na mwanasheria kutoka Ofisi ya DPP, ni kama kujaribu kuokoa jahazi.

Ndiyo maana nilipomuuliza, “Ofisa wa DPP anaitwa nani?” akasema hakumbuki, ana jina moja hivi la Kibantu.

Katika ukurasa wa 460, anasema ni kweli George Bagyemu anasema hakukuwa na mwanasheria, lakini Mahakama ikubali ushahidi wangu kwamba palikuwa na mwanasheria.

Sasa, kama Mahakama ikikubali ushahidi wa PW16, maana yake PW1 ni mwongo.

Sasa, ni Mahakama gani itakubali kunyonga kwa ushahidi huu?

WEKA EMOJI KAMA UNASOMA

SHARE ZAIDI UJUMBE UFIKE MBALI

Nyundo 🔨 anazopiga Lissu zinaua

 

[JaxenDL]

Mwanzo wa kesi alikua akienda kizimbani na kiporo cha ubwabwa na maharagwe, wafuasi wake wakamcheka na kumwambia aache njaa kali, kiporo husababisha changamoto za minyoo ndio akaacha,

Baada ya,
heche,amani na brenda kumkaanga na kumsagia kunguni mahakamani, na kuona kabisa kitanzi hiki hapa,

sasa anajikuta ana kiu mbaya sana,
usingizi kama wote,
.Si unajua tena last moments za mja wa Allah akiwa anaelekea ku r.i.p?🐒

Hello Broo man,

-Unapigania nini ?
-Unapigania akina nani ?
-For what in return ?

Nikuambie kitu, Wewe ni msomi na Smart and deep down you know what ur doing here.

Lakn hauoni unafika mbali kufanya dhihaka kwa mtu anae pambania uhai wake ?. Mtu alipigwa risasi 16, leo hii anatembea kwa kuburuta mguu, Don’t you feel sorry for him ?.

Uhai na maisha ya mtu leo mbele ya unachopambania hauna maana kabisa ?

I don’t know how to express,, lakin jaribu kua na utu acha utani na uhai wa mtu.. So please 🙏🏾.

 

[misasa]

Hello Broo man,

-Unapigania nini ?
-Unapigania akina nani ?
-For what in return ?

Nikuambie kitu, Wewe ni msomi na Smart and deep down you know what ur doing here.

Lakn hauoni unafika mbali kufanya dhihaka kwa mtu anae pambania uhai wake ?. Mtu alipigwa risasi 16, leo hii anatembea kwa kuburuta mguu, Don’t you feel sorry for him ?.

Uhai na maisha ya mtu leo mbele ya unachopambania hauna maana kabisa ?

I don’t know how to express,, lakin jaribu kua na utu acha utani na uhai wa mtu.. So please 🙏🏾.

Unafikir haelewi?

 

[JaxenDL]

TUNDU LISSU ANAFANYA MAJUMUISHO YA MWISHO MAHAKAMANI

SEHEMU YA 5.

Lissu: Na alipogundua kwamba hili la kutowashirikisha wanasheria ni jambo baya, akala matapishi yake katika ukurasa wa 169, akasema:

PW1: “The Chief Investigator, Amini Mahamba, was the one who communicated to DPP.”

“The DPP and his officers knew because all communication was online.”

Hapa anakula matapishi yake kwamba DPP alikuwa anajua kupitia Amini Mahamba na maafisa wake online.

That is a contradiction, Waheshimiwa Majaji.

Na, in any case, hakuna ushahidi wowote kwamba DPP alijulishwa na Bagyemu au Mahamba.

Waheshimiwa Majaji, jambo la tano ni kwamba PW1 hakuhusisha wala kutoa taarifa kwa mamlaka nyingine ya kiuchunguzi wala ya Serikali kuhusu hilo faili la uhaini.

Waheshimiwa Majaji, sitochoka kuwakumbusheni: faili linalozungumziwa ni la kosa la uhaini, siyo kesi ya wizi wa maembe.

Hakuhusisha wala kushirikisha mamlaka nyingine yoyote ya kiuchunguzi au ya Serikali.

Ushahidi unasema nini? Ukurasa wa 170, Waheshimiwa Majaji.

Jaji Ndunguru: Hii ni hoja ya tano au ya nne? Sisi tunaona ni ya nne.

Lissu: Nafikiri ni ya nne, Waheshimiwa Majaji.

PW1: “Treason is a highly profiled case.”

Anakubali kwamba kesi ya uhaini ni kesi kubwa na inahusu usalama.

Baadaye anasema hajawasiliana na Mkuu wa Idara ya Ujasusi wa Mkoa wala Mkurugenzi wa Usalama na Ujasusi kwa sababu siyo kazi yake.

Kesi inayohusu uhaini, anasema kwamba hajawasiliana na wanaohusika na usalama wa Taifa.

Huo ndiyo ushahidi, Waheshimiwa Majaji, ambao mnatakiwa mtoe hukumu ya kifo.

Hayo niliyoyasema kuhusu ushahidi wa PW1 hayakuwa reclassified.

Hakuna hata mmoja aliyeomba shahidi clarify hii damaging information, ukurasa wa 176.

Wakakubali kila kitu kwamba hakutoa taarifa kwa yeyote, halafu wanategemea Mahakama itoe hukumu ya kifo.

Huo ndiyo ushahidi wa PW1.

Vipi kuhusu ushahidi wa PW16, Amini Mahamba?

Waheshimiwa Majaji, kuhusu ushahidi wa msingi wa PW16:

Ni PW16 kuhusu kumeza hadithi ya PW1; alikubali kula kitu alichoambiwa na PW1.

Kitu cha pili, Waheshimiwa Majaji, nilisema wiki iliyopita juu ya confusion and contradiction.

PW16 anatofautiana kuhusu nani waliokuwa wapelelezi. Lugha inagongana.

Ukurasa wa 460, PW16 anasema hivi kuhusu Investigation Team ilikuwa na:

“SSP George Bagyemu, one officer from Office of DPP Dodoma.”

Maana yake ni kwamba anasema kulikuwa na ofisa kutoka Ofisi ya DPP ambaye hakutajwa jina.

PW1 anasema hakuwa na mwanasheria.

PW16 anasema kulikuwa na mtu kutoka Dodoma.

Kwa muda ambao PW16 anasema palikuwa na mwanasheria kutoka Ofisi ya DPP, ni kama kujaribu kuokoa jahazi.

Ndiyo maana nilipomuuliza, “Ofisa wa DPP anaitwa nani?” akasema hakumbuki, ana jina moja hivi la Kibantu.

Katika ukurasa wa 460, anasema ni kweli George Bagyemu anasema hakukuwa na mwanasheria, lakini Mahakama ikubali ushahidi wangu kwamba palikuwa na mwanasheria.

Sasa, kama Mahakama ikikubali ushahidi wa PW16, maana yake PW1 ni mwongo.

Sasa, ni Mahakama gani itakubali kunyonga kwa ushahidi huu?

WEKA EMOJI KAMA UNASOMA

SHARE ZAIDI UJUMBE UFIKE MBALI

Kila polisi anatakiwa awe na copy ya PGO na KATIBA ata kwa mfumo wa soft copy/apps kwenye simu. Iwasaidie kufanya reference kwa haraka maana daaah 🤦🏾‍♂️😁. Wanalivua jeshi lao nguo kabisa

 

[Manyanza]

TUNDU LISSU ANAFANYA MAJUMUISHO YA MWISHO MAHAKAMANI

SEHEMU YA 6.

Lissu: Pamoja na kwamba PW16 anasema kwamba palikuwa na mwanasheria:

1. Hakutajwa jina.
2. Hakuna mahali popote ametajwa katika maelezo yao (vielelezo).
3. Hakuna mwanasheria amekuja kutoa ushahidi hapa.

Kwa hiyo, hapakuwa na mwanasheria. Ni maelezo ya uongo ya kutunga.

Waheshimiwa Majaji, kwa kulinganisha ushahidi huu, upande kwa upande, huwezi — kwa kutumia akili ya kawaida tu — kuamini kwamba hawa polisi wanazungumzia kesi moja.

Ukurasa wa 462:

“Nikiridhika kwamba mshtakiwa alikuwa na lengo la kuipindua Serikali.”

Wakati shitaka linasema nilikuwa na lengo la kuitishia Serikali. (Anacheka.)

Mwenzake anasema kwamba alikuwa na lengo la kutishia Serikali, huyu anasema huyu anataka kuipindua Serikali.

Ndimi mbili kama nyimbo: huyu anataka kuitishia Serikali na huyu anataka kupindua Serikali.

Twende na ndimi ipi kati ya hizi ndimi mbili, Waheshimiwa Majaji?

Haya ni makosa mawili tofauti, Waheshimiwa.

PW16 alithibitisha kwamba yeye na PW1, hili genge la polisi, halikushirikisha mamlaka nyingine yoyote ya Serikali.

Ukurasa wa 466 unathibitisha kwamba hawakushirikisha mtu mwingine yeyote isipokuwa kagenge kao.

Anasema:

“Hakumtaarifu RSO wa Dar es Salaam, sikumtaarifu Mkurugenzi wa Usalama wa Taifa na Ujasusi. Sikumtaarifu Mwenyekiti wa Kamati ya Ulinzi na Usalama ya Mkoa wa Dar es Salaam. Sikuwataarifu afisa yeyote wa Idara ya Usalama wa Taifa. Sikuijulisha Ikulu, sikuijulisha Ofisi ya Makamu wa Rais, sikuijulisha Ofisi ya Waziri Mkuu.”

Waheshimiwa Majaji, wanazungumzia kesi ya uhaini hawa.

Baadaye kajikanyaga tena, ukurasa wa 466.

Ni ushahidi wa kutunga-tunga.

RPO Mayenga hakuitwa kutoa ushahidi. Ni maneno ya waongo tu.

Anaendelea kujikanyaga PW16 kwamba DPP alimteua ofisa kutoka Dodoma ambaye alipeleleza hii kesi.

UONGO.

Watu wanavaa uniform za polisi, kumbe ni waongo.

Wanakuja Mahakamani na vyeo vikubwa, kumbe ni waongo.

Kwamba DPP aliteua ofisa wa kupeleleza kesi — ni nani huyo? Jina hakuna.

Na hata nyie, Majaji, hamna jina lake.

Sasa, Waheshimiwa Majaji, hawa ndiyo waliotengeneza kesi.

Nje ya mashahidi hawa, kuna ushahidi wa mafichoni.

Waheshimiwa Majaji, PW16 alitoa ushahidi muhimu sana kuhusiana na hao mashahidi waliotoa ushahidi wao wa kificho.

Ushahidi huo upo katika ukurasa wa 481 wa rekodi.

Ushahidi huo ni muhimu sana, Waheshimiwa Majaji.

Unathibitisha pasipo shaka kwamba mashahidi wa mafichoni, ukiondoa PW17, ni mashahidi ambao walikuwa na maslahi makubwa ya kusema uongo.

Kwa hiyo, umuhimu wa ushahidi wa PW16 ni kwamba alithibitisha kwa Mahakama kwamba hawa wanaoitwa mashahidi wa kificho walikuwa na maslahi makubwa sana.

Ushahidi huo upo ukurasa wa 481, na anasema hivi:

WEKA EMOJI KAMA UNASOMA

SHARE ZAIDI UJUMBE UFIKE MBALI.

 

[govikubwa]

Kwa Sababu ya ccm nchi yetu imekuwa nchi ya matahira.

 

[TIETA]

Mwanzo wa kesi alikua akienda kizimbani na kiporo cha ubwabwa na maharagwe, wafuasi wake wakamcheka na kumwambia aache njaa kali, kiporo husababisha changamoto za minyoo ndio akaacha,

Baada ya,
heche,amani na brenda kumkaanga na kumsagia kunguni mahakamani, na kuona kabisa kitanzi hiki hapa,

sasa anajikuta ana kiu mbaya sana,
usingizi kama wote,
.Si unajua tena last moments za mja wa Allah akiwa anaelekea ku r.i.p?🐒

Hello. Kukaa kimya ni busara. Yes atahukumiwa kunyingwa hadi kufa. Tumeshakusikia na tumekubaliana na wewe. Sasa unaweza kukaa kimya ili tufuatilie kesi kwa mtiririko mzuri. Wengine hapa tunataka kujifunza na tunajifunza sio mambo ya ushabiki wa kijinga jinga tu.

 

[JaxenDL]

“Hakumtaarifu RSO wa Dar es Salaam, sikumtaarifu Mkurugenzi wa Usalama wa Taifa na Ujasusi. Sikumtaarifu Mwenyekiti wa Kamati ya Ulinzi na Usalama ya Mkoa wa Dar es Salaam. Sikuwataarifu afisa yeyote wa Idara ya Usalama wa Taifa. Sikuijulisha Ikulu, sikuijulisha Ofisi ya Makamu wa Rais, sikuijulisha Ofisi ya Waziri Mkuu.”

Case Closed.